CASES REPORTED. page ‘ ‘ Page . A. C. do A. B. Treadwell & C0. v. Buckstai, Allis v, .... . ............ 879 Anglo-Am. Packing Co .... , . .... 22 Bullock & Co. v. Tschergi & A. C. Ja A. B. Treadwell & Co., Schwinde. ....................... 345 Fowler Brothers v ......... . ..... 22 I Burham v. Fritz. . ... ......... . . ... 368 . ` Ah Sing, In re. ........ .. .... . . . ... 286 I Burley, Burton v ..... . ............ 811 Ah Tie, In re.. . . . .. ........ ... . 291 Burlington,>C. R. & N. R. C0., Hale, Albright, Teas v ..... i .......... .... 406 Ayer & Oo. v. .............. . . 203 Allen County, Thompson v......... 97 Burlington & M. R. R. Co., Tab- Allis v. Buckstaff ...... . ...... . .... 879 oreck v .............. . .... . . 105 Allis, Neacy v. .................. .. 874 Burnes, Courtright v . .....'.... .... 317 Allison, Hobbyv. ........... ....... 401 Burswel1,The. .... ................ 904 Am. Cent. lns. Co., Bailey v ...... .. 250 Burton v. Burley ........... ....... 811 Am. Life Ins. C0, v. Town of Bruce, Bush v. United States ........... ... 625 (Note,) .......................... 192 Bussey v. Memphis & L. R. R. C0. . 330 American Wine Co. v. Brasher Bros. 595 _ · Ames, Whittlesey v .... . . ...... .. .. 893 Caldwell, Second Nat. Bank v ... .. 429 Amoskcag Nat. Bank v. Town of Carll, United States v., (Note,)...... 96 Ottawa, (Note,). . . . . . . . ........ 559 Carson, Tuedt v. ................... 353 Anderson v. The Edam ............. 135 Carstairs v. Mechanics' & Traders' , Anglo-Am. Packing Co., A. C.- & A, Ins. Co. of N. Y. ............. ... 823 B. Trcadwell & C0. v ..... ... .... 22 C. B. Sanford, The ................. 910 Ant, The ......... .. . ......... . .... 91 Charles B. & James C. McVay, In re 443 Atchison, T. &'S. F. R. C0., Denver Chicago, D. & V. R. C0. v. Fosdick, & N. O. R. C0. v ................ 546 (Note,) ............, . ...... . .` .... . 96 Atchison, T, & S. F. R. C0., Kansas , Chicago & A. R. C0., Mass. Mut. Life V Pac. Ry. C0. v................... 106` Ins. Co. v ..................... .. 857 . Chinese Cabin Waiter, Case of the.. 286 Backus & Sons v. Start ..... . . . ..... 69 Chinese Laborers on Shipb’d, Case of 291 Bailey v. Am. Cent. ins. Co.... .... 250 j Chinese Merchant, Case of the ...... 605 Banking l-Iouse v. Trustees, (Note,). 304; Cimbria, The ...... . ......... . . ... 89 Barker v. Todd, .... . ...... .. ...... 473 | Cincinnati, I., St. L. & C. R. C0., Bartlett v. Smith . ..... ............ 263 McCoy v ........... .. ........... . 3 Bate Refrigerating C0 v. Gillett.... 553 City of Duluth and Village of Du- Bauman, Palmenhing v. ... . ... .... 672 luth, Brewis v ..... . ............. 334 Berry, Darling v. ..... ... .... ...... 659 City of Louisiana v. Taylor (Note,). 301 Bessie Morris, The................. 397 Cityx of Manchester v. Ericsson, , Bickford, Delong v . ......... ...... 32 ( ote )._. . . .......... . ........... 142 Bishop, Webber v. ......... . . ...... 49 City of IV ew Orleans v.Morris,(Note, 237 Blessing, Leathers v., (Note,). ... . . . 48 City of Ottawa v. Nat. Bank, (Note,} 191 BLumer, In re ......... . ..... ...622, 623 City of Peoria, Clark v. .... . ... .... 561 Boyd v. Clark. ....... . ............. 908 City of Peoria, Darst v. . ... ........ 561 Bradley, Marine & Riv. Phos., etc., City of Troy, The .... . . ....... .... . 47 Co._v., (Note,). ................ .. 301 Clark, Boy v ........ ..........,.. 908 Braudres v. ,_Coohrane, (N ow,) . . . ,. . 142 Clark v. City of Peoria ........ . .... 561 Brasher Bros., American Wine Clark, Lull v ........ . ...... .. ..... 456 Co. v ............................ 595 Clark County, Whitford v ...... 644, 837 Brewis v. City of Duluth and Village Coast Wrecking C0. v. Phoenix Ins. of Duluth. ........ . ....... . ...... 334 Co ............. . ............. .. . 127 Brooks, Watson v. ........ . ........ 540 Cochrane, Brandres v., (Note,) ..... 142 Buchanan, Hitchcock v., (Note,).... 143 Coe v. Morégan ......... . ........... 844 Buchholz Palmenbing v ......... .. 672 Columbia ('re Ins. Co.,Washingt0n _ Buckell,.1jones v., (Note,) . ... ... . .. 302 _ Mills Emery Manu£’g Co. v. ...... 646 v.1s-Fm. wr)