i CASES REPORTED.
ARRANGED UNDER THEIR RESPECTI VE CIRCUITS
AND DISTRI 0159.
Page Page
FIRST CIRCUIT. SECOND CIRCUIT.
Cmouir Coum, D. MASSACHUSETTS. Cmcurr Cotmr, D. CONNECTICUT.
Columbia Fire Ins. Co., Washington Cotter v. New Haven Copper Co . . . 234
Mills Emerv_ Manuf g Co. v. ...... 646 New Haven Copper Co., Cotterv. . . 234
Commercial Fire Ins. C0., Washing- Noyes, Wallace v .................. 172
ton Mills Emery Manuf’g Co. v.. . 646 Peck Brothers8a Co., Zane v. ....... 475
Coy v. Perkins ............ . ....... 111 Wallace v. Noyes,. ................ 172
Hnnnewell, United States v ........ 617 Zane v. Peck Bros. & Co ...... . ..... 475
Johns Hopkins, 'l‘he ......... . . .... 185
Mgg%?EFir° 1I2S'   Xglsgsington 646 Cmoorr Comm E D   Yom:
1 mery an . ....... 1 ‘ ‘ ‘
i»‘.§}‘i§§g,S(”5'.I§?’€`?Y‘.Y1Z`.'.`. 1112 I I   I I II iii (***3** W"‘°"*“g "°· "· P"“‘“" I““‘ 12-, '
      C0',   OdO•TE·••••.•••••¤••••••¤••••••• 2
ton Mills Emery Manuf g Co. v. .. 646 Phgaix z1é··i% · · 6(;éS:t· ééi{,;1é 72
Sampson v. Mudge ................. 260 C ‘ "
Smith,Inre'.--i.·".·····•.·"·..   O.V..•.••.....•..¤...•••••..•»-  
Trade Ins. Co., Washington Mills ·
Emer ' M&nl1f’g C0. V. .. ....... . . . 646 DIg·pR·[(;·];· COURT’ Eh ])_ NEW Y0RK_
United Ilickel Co. v. Worthington... 392
United States v. Hunnewell. .·..... 617 Anderson v. The Edam ..... .. ..... . 135
Victoria, The, .............··...... 43 Cimbria, The ...... . .............. ss
Wallace v. ilder. .... . ........... 707 C t' , G i' ......... . ....... . . 299
Wgshingtlon Malls Ignteny Mgnufg 646 Egiihgiimli?  The Edttm .......... 1:15
o.v.oum1a ·e ns. 0 .... . . .' , ......... . ....... `03
Washington Mills Ernery M¤¤}1f’g Edam, Tlhsezgnd eison v ............ 135
C0- Y- U0H1m€}`¢18l Fife 1¤S· @0--· 646 Edam, The, Dunscombe v. .......... 135
Washington _M111s_I¤hn¤ry M¤nuf’g Greefe v. Curtis ............ ... .... . 299
C0. v. Meriden Ftrs ins. 00 ·..--· 646 T. L. Wadsworth, The.; ........... 46
Wgshinglgyon Mwsl_Emer1y Malnuf’g 646
o. v. . oger 1 mms ns. o .....
Washington Mills Emery Manuf’g CIRCUIT Comvr, N. D. Nmw Yom:.
Co. v. Trade Ins. C0. ............ 646
Wilder, Wallace v ........... . ..... 707 t Barker v. Todd. .. ........... . ..... 473
Worthington, Uhiteti Nickel 00. v... 392 1g}¢l<;¤t·dwI;eL¤¤svv --·--·---·-··--- ig ‘
is 1 p, 1 er .. ..... . ..........
` Clark, Lull v ...................... 456
DNTRICT COURT, D· MASSACHUSETTS Coe v. Mor an ....... . ............. 844
Connell v. [Utica, U. & E. R. C0 .... 241
C. B. Sanford, The ................. 910 Delong v. Bickfo1·d ........ .. ...... 32
Roberts v. Swift ............. . ..... 915 Equitable Aid Union, Rowswell v... 840
Swift, Roberts v.. .... . ...... . ...... 915 E. Remington & Sons, Le Fever v... 86
· v.13—Fed. by (xv) K