XVI CASES REPORTED.
Page Page
Farr v. Town of Lyons. ........ .. .. 377 Cmcurr Comvr, D. VERMONT
Galloway, Tyler v. ................. 477 .
Hicks, illinghast v ............... 388 Dwight v. Smith ............ . ..... I 50
Holt v. Keeler ..................... 464 Jones, Steam Stone Cutter C0. v .... 567
Johnson v. Powers .............. .. . 315 Smith, Dwight v., .................. 50
Keeler, Holt v ............... . ..... 464 Steam Stone Cutter C0 v. Jones .... 567
Le Fever v. E. Remington & Sons... 86
Lull v. Clark ...................... 456
Morgan, Coe v ..................... 844
Powers, Johnson v ,............... . 315 THIRD (][B(]U]QT_
Rowswell v. Equitable Aid Union. .. S40
Tillinghast v. Hioks. ............... 388
Todd, Barker v., ........... . ...... 473 CIRCUIT O00M, D. DELAWARE.
Town of Lyons, Farr v., ........... 377
Tyler V. Galloway. ................. 477 G01d6D GIOVG, The ···-······- · ····· 700
Utica, U. & E. R. C0., Connell v .... 241
Webber v. Bishop. . ...... . ......... 49 DISTRICT Comm-, D_ DELAWARE
DISTRICT COURT, N_ D_ NEW Y0RK_ G01d0D Grove, Tl1C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 674
City or Troy, The .................. 47 Gmovrr GOOM`. D- NEW JERSEY-
Farmers’ & Mechanics’ Bunk, In re. 361 _
ire, Smith v .......,... . ..... . ..... 28 Albrlghtr {Peas? ·-··---·-·- _ ---..... 4 06
Murray, In re. ,.................... 550 Bow lIofrIe-Iorolivs C0 v- Gillott ---. 553
1.=a1mer,1¤ re ...................... 870 Domowo slowing Mach-00., Spriogv- 446
Smith v. Lee .......... . ........... 2S Folrr¤¤r8’ Loan & T- Oo- v- Oxford
ron Co .............. . ........... 169
Geo. li`. Bassett & Co., Schneider v. . 351
CIRCUIT COUIVI`. S- D- NEW YORK- gilletg Date gefrikperating O0. v... . 553
x or ron 0., armers’ Loan &
Bauman, Palmenbing v ............ 672 T. Co v ....... . ................. 169
Buchholz, Palmenbing v ........... 672 Schneider v. Geo. F. Bassett & C0... 351
1Daviesy.LzEthrop ..................   Spéing v. Domestic Sewing Mach. 44
umon v. `ry. .................... o. ...... . .............. . .... ... 6
Frost v. Marcus .................... 88 Teas v. Albright .... . ...... . ....... 406
Fry, Dumont v .................... 423
• 7
G6?.?..f£Q“EE. S?. ?‘T‘.*.l‘?}??F`,’T?? 358 DIWICI 09m D· NEW Jm¤Y·
Hohlweck, Palmenbing v ........... 672 I
Johnson v. Johnson ................ 193 Ant’Th° ''''''' °"" '°'°'''''°°   91
Lathrop, Davies v ................ . . 565
Marcus, Frost v .................... 88 CIRCUIT Covmu E- D- PENNSYLVANIA-
Merchants’ Manuf’g C0. v. Grand _
T,-ook Ry_ Co _________ _ _________ 358 N ellis v. Pennock Manuf’g Qo. ..... 451
New York, W_ S_ go B_ R_ Coq (_),-. Pennock Manuf’g Co.,Nell1sv ..... 451
merori v ......................... 370 1?h€B¤lX Iron 00,, Sellers Y -..-.-.-.. 20
Ormorod v_ New York, W_ 5_ gy B_ Sellers v. Phoenix Iron C0 .......... 20
R. Co ......... . .... . ............. 370 Wolvortou. T1I<-=· .-------·-..--..... 44
Palmenbing v. Bauman. ...... . ..... 672
P&ll1'1€l'll1)ll1g V. Bl1ChhOlZ. . . . . . . . . . . 672 DISTI{ICT COURT. E, D_ PENNSYLVANIA_
Palmenbing v. Hohlweck .......... 672
Pearson, VVils0r1 V. ........ . ···.··· 3*6 Bessie Morris, The. . . . . . . . . . .. ..... 397
Seligman, lValser v ............. · · · 415 Blumer, In re ..... . ............ 622 623
Walsor v. Soligman .-··-·-·-··-···· 415 John W. Hall, The ............. ;..’ 394
Wilson Y. Poarson --·---»·----··-·- 386 Mark Lane, The. ...... . ........... 800
. Wm, H. Blumer   Co., In rs .... 622, 623
DISTRICT COURT, S D_ NEW YORK Williams & Ls1d1g, In re. .......... 30
Hubert v. Recknagel ............... 912 Cmcurr Counr, W; D. Pmmzsrxivama.
Pennsylvania R. (Jo., Waldman v. . . 801
Recknagel, Hubertv ............. .. 912 Duh? v. First Nat, Bank ............ 65
Waldman v. Pennsylvania R. C0.. . 801 First Nat. Bank, Duff v ............ 65