CASES REPORTED.
Page Page
Agar & Lelong, Liverpool, B. da Riv. Brooklyn City et Newtown R. R.,
P. Nav. Co. v .................... 615 United states v .. .........   . 284
Alaska Gold & Silver Min. Co., Brooklyn Cross-town R. Co., Ste-
Faull v .............. . .... . ...... 657 phenson v ....... . . ............. 457
Alexander, Ex parte. ... . .......... 680 Brooks, Hall v ..................... 113
Allegheny Base-ball Club v. Ben- Buckley v. Gould & Curry S. Min.
nett..... .... ............ ........ 257 Co ............................. ..833
Allegro v. Leber ..... ...... ........ 491 Bull v. First Nat. Bank of Kass0n.. 612
Allen, Union Stone Co. v. .. . .... ... 353 Burnell, Ferry v ..... . . . .. . . .. . .... 807
Allen, United States v... . .. ..... . . . 263 Burnes, Ridenbaugh v. .... . . . . . . . . . 93
Alzena, The .......... . ..... ... .... 174 Bush v. United States .... .......... 32]
Amanda Powell, The .... . . ; . . . . .... 486
American Lloyds, Higgie v .... . .... 143 Calhoun v. St. Louis & S. E. Ry. Co 9
Anderson v. Line.` ............ ..... 405 Calista Hawes, The ...... . ......... 493
Archibald, Wolff v. .. . ....... .. .... 369 Cameron, Goss v ................... 576
Arendal, The, (two cases).......... 580 Caniield v. Minn. Agri. & Mech.
Arn v. City of Kansas ...... .. .... 236 Ass’n ........ .. ...... . ........... 801
Athol Machine Co., Starrett v ...... 910 Carolina, The ................. .... 424
Atlanta Cotton Factory Co., Carr v. Austin & N. W. R. Co. ..... 419
Coann v ........... .. .... .. ...... 4 Case, Hiles v ........ . .... . ..... ... 141
Attrill, Oglesby v...... ..... ... .... 214 Castello v. Castello ..... . .... ...... 207
Aultman v. Morse ....... . ..... . .... 152 C. C. Trowbridge, The ............ . 874
Austin & N. W. R. Co., Carr v.. .... '419 Central Vermont R. Co, Paine v. .. . 269
Austria, The, (two cases) ....... .... 298 Chariton County, Coquard v ....   203
Chase, The ............ L ........ ... 854
Babbitt v. Dotten ..... . ......   19 Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co., Field v.. 332
Bakerv. Power ..... ............... 483 Chicago, etc. Manuf’g C0., West-
Barney, Latham v.................. 433 ern, etc., Manuf’g Co. v .......... 691
Barrell, Tilton v ..... .. ............ 609 Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v.
Bass, Morgan v.............. ...... 454 Minn. Cent. R. Co. .......   .... 525
Beard, Schlesinger v ..... .. ........ 687 Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry, Co.,
Beaulieu & Allen v. City of Pleas- Thompson v .... ‘ ................. 564
ant Hill ......................... 222 Chicago & N. W. R. Co, Beecher v. 211
Beecher v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. 211 Chickering, Wilson v .... ..... .... 917
Belford, Clemens v ................ 728 Chinese‘Tax Cases, The.... ........ 338
Bennett, Allegheny Base-ball Club v. 257 Chung Yune v. Kelly ........... ·. .. 639
Berney, Drexel v .... . ........ . ..... 268 City of Brooklyn, Gamewell Fire-
Bierbaoh v. Goodyear Rubber Co... . 826 alarm Tel. Co. v .... . . .......... 255
Big Pittsburg Consol. S. Min. Co., City of Dover, Norton v ..... ... .... 106
Tabor v ............. ............ 636 City of Kansas, Arn v.. .... ........ 236
Bingham, Winstead v. . .. . . . . . ... . . 1 City of Milwaukee, The ............ 365
Blair, Clark v. ... .... .......... .... 812 City of New Orleans, Hart v .... . . . . 180
Blenheim, The. .... .... ...... ...... 797 City of New Orleans, New Orleans,
Blythe v. Luning .............. .... 281 M. & C. R. Co. v ...... . ......... 373
Boston Daily Advertiser Corp’n, City of Pleasant Hill, Beaulieu &Al-
Hoe v ..... ’.. .......... . ...... . . 914 len v ...... . ....... . ............. 222
Boston, H. & E. B. Co., Graham v.. 753 City of St. Paul, Delger v ....... ... 567
Boulton v. Moore .... . . . .... .. ..... 922 Clark v. Blair. ............ , . ... .... 812
Bourne, Ross v ........... . .... .... 858 Clark, March, Price & C0. v..   406
Brewster & Co. v. Parry ..... . ...... 694 Claypool, United States v. V. . . . . ..... 127
Brlswalter v. Long. ... .... .... ..... 153 Clemens V. Belford . ... ...... ...... 728
v.14-Fm:. (ix)