XV1 CASES REPORTED.
Page Page
Francisco Garguilo, The. ........... 495 Mead, In re ...... . ..... . ........... 287
lsmaele, The ......   ....... . ..... 491 Mendota, The ...........,.......... 358
Julia L. Sherwood, The ......... ... 590 Privateer, The ..................... 872
Leber, Allegro v ................... 491 Rose, United States v. ............. 681
Peter Ritter, The .................. 173 Schwarz, In re .................... 787
Tiger Lily, The .................   591 Sturgis, United States v ............ 810
Three Pgckagesgf Distilled Spirits. 569
United rates v. ose .... . ......... 681
CIRCUIT COUMB N` D` NEW YORK` United States v. Sturgis ............ 8.0
Hurlburt v. Van Wormcr .......... 709
Roberts v. Wallcy ........ . ...... 167 Omcnrr Comm-, D. Vmmoncr.
Thomas v. Town of Lansing . ...... 618
Town of Lansing, Thomas v . ...... 618 Central Vermont R. Co, Paine v .... 269
Van Wormer, Hurlburt v.. . . ...... 709 Colvin, Yale Lock Manuf’g C0. v. . . 269
Walley, Roberts v .... . . ..... . ...... 167 _Dndl<—y v. Lamoille Co. Nat. Bank.. 217
Lamoille (Co. Nat. gang, Dudley v.. 217
Paine v. ‘ent. Vt. . ‘0. .......... 269
DISTRICT C°"“T’ N‘ D‘ NEW Y°“K‘ s Yale Lock Manuf’g co. v. oeiviii. .. 269
Alexander, Ex parte ............... 680
013001*1* Comvr, S. D. Nnw Yom:. THIRD CIRCUIT- .
BETH6g', Drexel V. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 DISTRIGT COURT` ])_ DELAWARE_
Drexe v. Berney .................. 268
D¤‘¤¤¤m<>¤d T<>¤¤·¤¤¤ 00-. P· L<>ri1— William Law The ........... . .... 792
lard & Co. v.. ................... 111 ` .
( .
9L1TB`?;.?;..? Ly; s ; ; 1 · . :1: t i J : · · r t 3; ESS     D- NEW JEW-
I“Q;§,;;b§°’ °°‘“b “°·· l”°*’l’°“‘ 70., cms, Welling v ...... . ..... . .... _ . 571
signi. v. ria; I ‘.°.°. 111 Z I I I I I I   sa H¤¤~¤le¤<=r¤ Specific H¤¤¢¤¤Mh¤¤
Kirby v. Lake shore & M. s. R. oe? 261 WM§f*'°’“° 89 "· W9" ···· · ·······  
Lake Shore at M. s. it. oe., Kirby v. 261 W9' mg "· T9- ;-   --:,,--,5, ·-···
Loeb, United Statesv .............. css "“’· Hump ?'€’YS ?P'°`°‘ ° °m°‘ 250
Lorillard & TCO_ V, Drummond T0_ opathic Medicine (.,0. v .........,.
bacco Co ........................ 111
Lorillard & Co. v. McAlpin ........ 112 D1sr1uo·r Conivr, D. New Jmnsnv.
Matthews v. Spangenberg .......... 350
McA1pin, P. Lorillard & Co v .... .. 112 Clifton, The ........... . ......... .. 586
N. Y. Pharmical Ass’n v. Tl1d0n... 740 Devoe Manuf’g Co., Hall v ......... 183
Poppenhauser v. India - rubber Hall v. Devoe Manuf'g C0 ......... 183
Comb Co ........................ 707 Houghton, United States v ..... . . . . 544
P. Lorillard do Co. v. Drummond United States v. Houghton- ........ 544
Tobacco Oo. ............ , ........ 111 .
P. Lorillard & Co. v. McAlpin ...... 112 CIRCUIT COURT E D_ PENNSYLVANIA_
Schell, Simpson v .................. 286 ’ `
Simpson v, Schell. ..... .. .......... 286 Allen, Union Stone Co. v ...... . .... .353
Spangenberg, Matthews v ...... .. .. 350 Anderson v. Line ......... . ........ 405
Tice, Ingalls v. _ ............... 297, 352 Coit v. North Carolina Gold Amal-
Tilden, N. Y. Pl1armicalAss’n v... 740 gamating C0 ......... . ..... . ..... 12
Tilden, Wilkinson v. ............... 778 Com’rs of Chester Co., Nat. Bank of
United States v. Loeb .... . ......... 688 Chester Co. v. ....... . . . . . . ...... 239
Wilkinson v. Tilden ................ 778 Damon & Bihn v. Eastwick ...... .. 40
. Eastwické Damon & Bihn, v ........ 440
v _ Line, An erson v .... , , . . . .......... 0
DISTRICT (’OUPT’ ,S` D` NEW YORK' Margarethc Blanca, The ............ 59
Distilled Spirits, Three Packages of. 569 Markcc, The ....................... 112
Florence P. Hall, The. . .. .......... 408 Nat._Bank of Chester Co. v. Com’rs
Hattie Low, The ....... . ..... . ..... S80 of Chester Co ......... _ ........ . . . 239
Hudson, The ...................... 489 Nederland, The ...... . ............. 63
lndia, The ............... . ........ 476 North Carolina Gold Amalgamating
Leonard, Inre.............. ....... 53 Co.,C0it v., .................... 12