CASES REPORTED. IVE
Page Pip
Roman, The ....... . .... . .....   61 Drsrmor Cover, S. D. Fnonma.
Tutton, Viti v .................... . 241 ` _
Union Stone Co. v. Allen ........... 353 Chase, The ........................ 854
Viti v. Tutton ..................... 241
Cmcmr Coeur, N. D. Gnonom.
Drsrnrcr Coeur, E. D. Pm~msr1.vAmA. _
_ Atlanta Cotton Factory Co.,
Alwnm, The. ..... . ........... . .... 174 Coann v ....... . ..... . .... V ...... 4
Arendal, The, (two easest .... . ..... 580 Bingham, VVinstead v .............. 1
Eutaw, The, v. The Gratitude ...... 479 Ceann v. Atlanta Cotton Factory
Eutaw, The, The Gratitude v ....... 479 Co. ........... . . .. .............. 4 ·
Gratitude, The, v. The Eutaw ...... 479 Continental Nat. Bank of New York,
Gratitude, The, The Eutaw v ....... 479 Folsom v.. ............ . ......... 497
Mary, The .............. . .......... 584 Folsom v. Continental Nat. Bank of
` Maryland, The ..................... 367 New York. ...................... 497
Nora, The ........................ . 429 Winstead v. Bingham .............. 1
CIRCUIT COURT,   D. PENNSYLVANIA. QIRCUIT OQURT,   D_ GEORGLL
Allegheny Base-hell )Uh¤h V- Bennett 257 Clark, March, Price & oe. v. .... . .. 406
BBDIIIJIBAlI€gII0II)'I·*§I*UjI*IlII 0h1h v- 257 March, Price & Go. v. Clark ....   406
Iron my Mt. Bk. et Pmshurgh v- United States v. Wilcier ............ 393
Siemens-Andersen Steel Ge -..---· 150 Wilder, United States v ............ 393
Linton v. Mosgrove ........... . .... 543
Mosgrove. Linton v. ............... 543
Siemens-Anderson {Steel Co., Iron CIRCUIT COURT, E~ D- LOUISIANA-
' ·.Bk.f' brh .... 150
City NM O ms u g v Agar & Lelong, Liverpool, B. & Riv.
AP. Nag. {Jo, v ......... . .......... 615
. ttri , g eswy v .................. 214
FOURTH CIRCUIT. City of New Orleans, Hart v ........ 180
City of New Orleans, New Orleans,
  . M. & C. It. C0. v ...... . ......... 373
CIRCUIT COM D·II~=¤¤¤· D....i.g.., ritzperriek . ............ 216
Fitzpatrick v. Domingo ....... . .... 216
Amgjuda POUCH' The '’'‘'`‘''’''''' 486 Hart v. City of New Orleans ....... . 180
Moses v, Basin .... . ......... . ..... 772 L_ B t N O 1 N Bk
Rasin, Moses v .................... 772 “AS:,;°vn· ew I mms an g· 646
i; 1 is ·1 sr a·» Pint.
Oraonrr Coonr, W. D. Norvm Osnonnu. };L8;€f)(Z;{,_ VT3Q$é.a, & L;§§;`1g_ _   615
` ew Orleans ater-works C0. v.
Holmes, 'laylorv .............   498 SL Tmmmm W,,,m,._W(,,.ks UOM 194
Taylor v. Holmes ...... . ........... 498 New (),»]C,mS,   & g_ R_ CO_ v_ City
of New Orleans ...... . ........... 373
Drsrmcr COURT,W.D.NOBTH Csnonmn. N lf5W Orleans N at. Bkg. A.ss’n v. Le 646
re on ..........................
Deaver, United States v ............ 595 Oglesby v. Attrill . ................ 214
United States v. Deaver ........... . 595 Peme Jury of Parish ef Tensns, 9
" omasv ..........   ......... .30
St. 'l`an~.m¤.ny Water-works Co. New
CIRCUIT COURL E' D' VIRGINIA' Orleans W ater-works Co. v.? ..... 194
Neale, United States v. ..... . ....... 767 Tlgfgaggm I’°I*°° Jury °f Parish °f 390
United States v. Neale .......... . . .. 767 ’ S °'°''''' ’ ' '‘'‘‘‘'‘‘'‘‘'‘‘'
D1s·mro·r Coeur, E. D. Loursmzu.
FIFIII CIRCUIT- , 8...,%.., The ..................... 424
oo , ‘ryv.. ...................   424
Cmcorr Conxvr, S. D Fnonma. Eugster & Co., Pedersen v ......... 422
Fry v. Cook ....................... 424
Stores, United States v ...... .. .... . 824 Montapedia, The .................. 427
United States v. Stores ............. 824 Pedersen v. Eugster do Co .......... 422
v.14 Fmo.—b