i CASES REPORTED.
Page Page
Craeurr Coeur,   D. Mrssrssxiwr. SEVENTH C[B(]U]']j_
Duncan Morse v ....... L .......... 396 ‘
Laughlin v. nmcheii ,.............. 382 CIRCUIT C°'"“`* N' D' I"'*"'°‘S·
Mitchell, Laughlin v ............... 382 Babbitt v. Dotten ..... . ............ 19
Morse v. Duncan .................. 396 Beecher v. Chicago & N. W. R. C0. 211
Belford, Clemens v .......... . ..... 728
Cmonrr Conm, E. D. Texas. E§;g;$SnV·G}g3SO;° ··················  
Ansauen w. n. ot., om v..   ne Ol;l$;·z;€;~¤1$ial$ue3;fés) gw Wm- 691
. . Carr v. Austin & N. W. li. (Jo ..... . 419 Chicago &»N- W, R. C0, Beech;} V- 211
_ ` Clemens v. Belford ....... . . . ...... 728
Cmourr (,oUn·r, N. D. TExAs. CML one H,md,.(.d Tons of ________ 878
L Wis Smm v 65 Consol. Safety-valve Co. v. Kunkle 732 ·
_°3 » · _ ··•-·· · ·····-·····-··· Dotten, Babbitt v ......... . ........ 19
State v. Lewis ........... . ....... .. 65 gay V}%>,.cm8d_;f _____        _1_ 652
ive undre ons 0 0a , i -
cox v ......... . .................. 49
SIXTH CIRCUIT Foélansbee, Scottish-Am. Mortgage 125
• 0. v ...... . ......... . ...........
Furst & Bradley Manuf’g Co. New-
_ CIRgUIT COURT, E_ D_ ]\,[]o{[[GAN_ ton V. . . . . . . . . . . ....... . . .   .... . . 465
Goss v. Cameron ..... . .. .......... 576
Grand Trunk R,y_ Col, Rao v_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 40] Grand DGLOUT Plow C0., WV&I‘Cl V .... 696
Langdon v_ Union ]\[nt,_ Ljfo [gg_ 0g_ 272 HHYCGD V. SHOW'. .1 .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Rae v_ Grand Trunk Ry_ Co ________ 40] Kunkle, Consol. bafetywalve Co. v. 732
Union Mm. L. nts. oo., Langdon v. 272 La Salle & Peru Gzwllght & Coke
L Co., Sayer v. ....... . .... ........ 69
ouie Dole, The ......... . ......... 862
CIRCUIT C°“*T· S· D- OHM iolnrark Twain" om,*1·n¤. .....   728
. . Boulton v ........ . . . 922
Gottfried v. Moerlein .............. 170 Mgguh ' ''’' '°
. , . . gan Elevated Ry. C0. v. Pullman 648
M°°rl€m* °*°l“¤¤d V ‘''‘‘‘'‘'‘'‘’' 170 Morning Star, The ............... .. 866
Newton v. Furst & Bradle Manuf'
Cmeurr Coeur, S. D. 01110, E. D. Co ...... . .............   ........   465
‘ North Chicago Rolling Mill C0.,
Farmers’ Nat. Bank of Portsmouth, Weir v ,... . ..................... 42
HO., v. Haivnnon.     ....   . .     593 One Hundred Tons of Coal ........ . 878
annon, armers’ i at. an 0 Peterson, Thorson v ............... . 742
Portsmouth, O., v .............. .. 593 Preble, Fay v .... . .... . ..... . ...... 652
Pullman, Morgan Elevated Ry.
v — C0. V ............. . ........ . ..... 648
CIRCUIT (JOURT’ b` D` OHIO' W` D` Sayer v. La Salle & Peru Gas-light
Dodds Wisnerv .....,...   ...... 655 & C<>k¤ C0 -·-····- - ·-······-   69
wma} wnoadg ....... . ........... ast S<><>lll¤~ll-~’~¤l- M<>r=¤¤e<~> <>¤— V- F¤l—
vlansbee,   ...................... 125
Cmourcr Couar, M D Tnnnnssnn b]£~$,?ri{{£;g{b1;g`cha1r C0` v' Tobey 38
· · · ·n ....................
. Snow Hayden v ..... . ............. 70
Allen, Umted States v ..... . ........ 263 — ’ .
umm stmsv. Amen ....... . ...... 263 $f§{."S§§‘j’;,P§.;é,I.;’§Sf,‘§;jjjjjjjjjjjjjjj Q2
Tobey Furniture C0. Singer Rock-
Crncnrr Counr, W. D. Tnnivnssnm. ing-chair Co. v .... ’ .... .. .. ...... 38
Turnbull v. Weir Plow Co ...... . . . 108
Deford. Hinkle & Co. v. Mehaffy. . . 181 Ward v. Grand Detour Plow Co .... 696
Louisville Underwriters, Moores v.. 226 Weir v. North Chicago Rolling Mill
Mehaffy, Deford, Hinkle & C0. v .... 181 C0 ........ . ......... .. .......... 42
Memphis & Little Rock R. C0. v, Weir Plow Co., Turnbull v ......... 108
Nolan ....... . ................... 532 Western, etc., Manuf’g C0. v. Chi.
Moores v. Louisville Underwriters., 226 etc., Manuf’g Co ............... . . 691
Nolan, Memphis & Little Rock R. Wilcox v. Five Hundred Tons of
C0. v ........ . ......... . . . . . ..... 532 Coal ...... . ............... . ..... 49