2. rmnniun imronrmn. At common law and in equity it is well settled that the incidents follow the principal, and that the transfer of a note secured by a mort- gage carries with it the mortgage security;` so that the transfer by delivery of a note payable to bearer, will transfer the mortgage given to secure the note. And the law of Georgia is the same, unless there has been a change made by some statute ofthe state. See Ga. 86; 32 Ga. 228. * ‘ The statute claimed to have made this innovation is the act of 1873. Sess. Acts 1873, pp.·4s2 to 47. Section 21, thelast of the act, is to the effect that "all liensiherein provided for may be as- signed by writing and not otherwise, and under such assignment the assignee shall have all the rights of the assignor as regulated by this act." ___Anexamination of the entire act shows that the first section declares certain liens to be established, among which is the lien by mortgage. The second section provides for the superiority of liens for taxes,—first for the state, secondly for counties, and thirdly for municipalities. The third section is to the effect that certain liens, to-wit, in favor of judgment creditors, of mortgage creditors, and in favor of the state for costs, shallremain as under existing laws, ex- cept when altered by the subsequent provisions of the act. The re- maining and subsequent sections relate in no manner to provisions for the mortgage lien, and in no way alter the mortgage lien. No adjudicated cases from the supreme court of Georgia are cited where the last section of the act in question, or section 1996 of the Code to the same purport, have been construed so as to cover assignments of . mortgages. i The case of Dalton City O0. v. Johnson, 57 Ga. 398, cited by counsel for. defendant, throws no light on the question; the notes sued on contained no negotiable words, and there was no assignment proved in writing or otherwise. The case of Turk v. Cook, 63 Ga. 681, referred to, is not in point. That was a suit brought on an open account, without an assign- ment in writing. The case of Planters' Bank v. Prater, 64 Ga. 609, cited, would cover the case, had the question under consideration been before the court. That was a suit brought on an absolute conveyance of real estate, with a bond to reconvey on the payment of certain notes pay- able to order, which notes were not indorsed, but were transferred by delivery. Jackson, Justice, in giving the opinion of the court, says: _