CASES REPORTED. xi . Page _ Page Lawrence v. Norton ........... . .... 853 N. Y. Harbor & Tow-boat Co. v. L. B. Snow, The .... . ....... . ...... 282 Grain Elevators, (three eases ) .... 124 Little Rock & Ft. S. Ry.,T0mpkins v. 6 New York, L. E. 60 W. R. Co., Nick- ` Lorillard v. Wight ................ . 383 als v .... . ..... . ................. 575 ‘ Lyon, Rawson v .................. .. 831 Nichols v. Beard .................. 435 ‘ , Nichols, Marsh v .............. . . . . 914 Malloy v. Bennett. .......... .. .... 371 Nickals v. New York, L. E. & W. R. Margot v. Schnetzer. ..... . ......... 118 Co ...... . ..... . ........ ...... 575 Marqua, Pope Manuf’g Co. v ....... 400 Noble, Union Cement Co. v ........ . 502 Marsh v. Nichols .................. 914 Northampton Nat. Bank, Wylie v.. . 428 Marshall, Rogers v ................. 193 Northern lns. Co.v. St. L. & S. Ry.C0. 840 Martin, Dodd v .............. . ..... 338 Norton, Lawrence v. . .. ............ 853 Matthews v. Murchison ............ 691 Nye v. Allen ....... ......... ... 114 Matthews v. Spangenberg .,....... , 813 · May, La Croix v .... . .............. 236 Old Colony R. Co., Nat. Car-brake McClelland v. Whiteley ............ 322 Shoe Co. v ....................... 462 ‘ McCloskey v. Hamill ............... 750 Oregon Ry. & N. Co., Wells v.. .... 561 _ McClung, Cleveland, C., C. & I. Ry. Oregon & C. Ry, Co.,Wells v ...... 561 Co. v ............................ 905 Oriental Mills, The, Hayden v ...... 605 MeConnochin v. Kerr ........ 1 ..... 545 McGowan, Poage v ...... .. ........ 398 Pacific Exp. Co., United States v... 867 McKinney, In re ................... 535 Parody v. Chicago, M. ds St. P. Ry. McKinney, In re ......... . ........ 912 Co ................. . ............ 205 Memphis & Charleston R. Co., Hall Parsons v. Colgate.. .. ........ . .... 600 `v .............. . ........ . ...... . 57 Pegasus, The .... ....... .. .... 921 Merritt, Phelps v .................. 788 Pelham v. Edelmeyer ............. . 262 Metropolitan Grain & Stock Ex- Pendleton, United Nickel Co. v.... 739 change v. Chicago Bd. of Trade... 847 Pennsylvania, The ........... . .... . 814 Miller, Union Nat. Bank v ......... 703 Pequonnock Nat. Bank, Scott v .... 494 Miner, Whipple v. ................. 117 Phelps v. Merritt .......... .. ...... 788 Mineral Phosphate, A Cargo of, · Pioneer Press Co., Gribble v. ..... .. 689 Wenberg v ...... . .......... 285 Poage v. McGowan ................ 398 Miskell, United States v. ......... . . 369 Pope Manuf’ g Co. v. Marqua. ...... 400 Mittelhuscher, Davenport Nat. Bank Porter v. Beard .................... 380 v. ............. . ..... .... . .... 225 Porter, Forehand v ................ 256 Mobile & G. R. C0., Pressley v....·.. 199 Prell, Cobb v .... . ..... . ........ 774 Motlitt, Cote v ..... ............ 345 Pressley v. Mobile & G. R. Co ....... 199 Molfltt, Hatch v. ................... 252 Proebstel v. Hogue ................. 581 Monticello, The ...... . ....... . ..... 474 Pyle, Hardesty v ................... 778 Moores v. Citizens’ Nat. Bank. .... . 141 Moran v. Secord ................... 509 Raft of Timber, A, Muntz v ........ 555 . Morgan v. Kansas Pac. Ry. Co. .... 55 Raft of Timber, A, Muntz v ........ 557 Moyer, In re ....................... 598 Rainey v. Baltimore & O. R. 767 Moyers, United States v ....... · ..... 411 Ranger, Hnggart v ......... . ....... 860 Multnomah R. C0., Burns v ........ 177 Rapallo, Dallinger v. .............. 434 Muntz v. A Raft of Timber ........ 555 Rau, Reay v ....... . ............... 749 Muntz v. A Raft of Timber . ....... 557 Rawson v. Lyon ................... . 831 Murchison, Matthews v ...... . ..... 691 Rcny v. Rau ........ . .............. 749 Murphy, United States v ........... 589 Re ssner, Sharp v ........ . ......... 919 Myers, Nat. Manuf’g Co v ......... 237 Rialto, The ....................... . 124 Robertson, Bartram v .......... . . . . 212 National Bank of Barre, Hill v ..... 432 Rogers v. Marshall .... . ........... 193 National Car-brake Shoe Co. v. Bos- Roth, In re .............. . .... . . . . 506 ton & A. R. Co ...... .. . .. ...... 462 Rubber ds Celluloid Harness Trim- National Car·brake Shoe Co. v. Bos- ming Co., Theberath v .......... . 246 ` ton & M. R. Co ..... . ........... 462 National Car-brake Shoe Co. v. Old Saifarans, Larkin v ............. ... 147 Colony R. Co .................... 462 St. Louis & S. Ry. Co., Northern National Manuf’g Co. v. Myers ..... 237 Ins. Co. v. ...... . . ..... . . . . ...... S40 Nazro, Von Cotzhauseu v .......... 891 Samuel Ober, 'l‘he ....... . .......... 621 Neto, The ......... . .... . .......... 819 Saratoga, The ..... . ................ 382 New York Belting & Packing Co. Sarrazin, Lacroix Fils v ..... .. .. 489 v. Sibley .................. . ..... 386 Scl1minke,West. Star Lodge, No. 2,v. 410