CASES REPORTED. . T
- JRRANGED UNDER THEIR RESPEOTIVE CIRCUITS
AND DISTRIOTS. .
 
‘ Pag•
FIRST . (]IR(_]UIT_ Standard Measuring Machine C0. v. 390
. ' `uaguc .... . .... . ...... . .........
` zen. l` an ea urin Ma-
<>¤=¤¤¤¤ 0<>¤M.1>· MSSACHUSETTS- 1 °Ziiii'Z’ og? v.°iii(i.   . .8. .. E ..... ssc
T ` » A. ..................1].7
Allen, Nye v ............ . ......... 114 “ mpi IB V` Mmm. `
American Bell Telephone Co. v. Dol- ‘
bear ................... . ........ 448 Dxsrnrer Counr, D. ]irIASSACHUBE'1‘TS·
Beard, Nichols v ................... 435 _
Beard, Porter v .................... 380 BGSTOH & A--K Cc., Ullimd BWWS V- 209-
`ggsmn & A_ R_ C0,, Na; ()m·-1l;-algg Fitchburg R,. Co., United States v.. 209
Shoe Co. v ........ . ....... . ..... 462 L- B· SNOW, Thi! ·-··········-····-· 282
Boston & M. R. Co., Nat. Cnr-brake Samuel Ober, The .................. 621
Shoe Co. v ...................... 462 United States v. Boston & A. R. Co. 209
Burt, Evory v ............... . ..... . 112 United States v. Fitchburg R'. C0... 209
Cote v. llloiiitt ....... . . . ...... . .... 345
Dallinger v, {apollo .......... . .... 434 , B
Dolhear, American Bell Telephone CIRCUIT COURP’D‘ NEW HAM]? mmm
(Jo.v.......... ..... ............. 448 H fE  
Evorr v. Burt.. ....... ·. . ....... . .... 112 iummss Y' Town 0 Fs0m' ''''°'' ‘
Goodiiieh, Singer Mgmupg ()0_ V ____ 455 'IOW11 of LDSOm, Huutiess v. . .... . . 732
Hatch v. Moliitt .............. . ..... 252
Knapp v. Shaw .................... 115 Cmourr Coum, D. Rrzonn Ismim.
Margot v. Schnctzer. ............... 118
Miner, Whipple v. ................. 117 Gould v. Spicer. . .‘ ........... .. . ... 344
Motlitt, Cote v ............. L . ...... 345 [·Ia_yden v. The Oriental Mills....; 605
Moiiitt, l-latch v. ................... 252 Oriental Mills, The, Hayden v ...... 605
National (Jar-brake Shoe Co. v. Bos- Spicer, Gould v. . . .... . .. . . . . ..... 344
ton&A.R.Oo ......   .... .. 462
National Car-brake Shoe C0. v. Bos-
ton & M. R. Co ...... . ..... . ..... 462 V
National Car-brake Shoe Co. v. Old SEQOND (]]B,QU['_[’_
Colony R. Co ........ . ........ . . . 462
New York Belting & Packing C0.
v. Sibley ........................ 386 Cmcurr Comvr, D. Conmnomcur.
Nichols v. Beard .... . ............. 435
Nye v. Allen ...................... 114 Andrews v. Eames ................. 109
Old Colony R. C0., Nat. Car-brake Babcock v. Judd ..... . ............. 160
Shoe Co. v ....................... 462 _ Eames, Andrews v. ........ T ........ 109
Porter v. Beard ........... . ........ 880 Forehand v. Porter ........... . . . . . 256
Rapallo, Dallinger v. .............. 434 Judd, Babcock v. .................. 160
Schnetzer, Margotv ................ 118 Porter, Forehand v ........ . ....... 256
Shaw, Knapp v .................... 115 Scovill Manu`f’g C0., Yale Lock
Sibley, New York Belting & Pack- Manuf’g Co. v ............ . . .... 342
ing Co. v ........ . ..... . ......... 386 Yale Lock Manuf’g C0. v. Scovill
Singer Mannf’g C0. v. Goodrich .... 455 Manuf’g Co .... ` ........... . . . ... 342
v.15—Fm>.-b` (xiii) ·