X CASES REPORTED.
Paz¤ Page
Clatiin v. Liss0H............... .... 897 Flower City,Th0. .... . ·............ 866
Clark v. Herman .................. 812 Folsom Brothers v. City of New Or-
Clark, Louisiana State Lottery Co. v. 20 leans. .· .......... . .......... . .... 11
Claybrook v. City of Owensboro .... 297 Foote, Darlington Iron Co. v .... ... 646
Coburn v. Brainard .... . ........ .. . 412 Fordyce v. Peper ........ .. ........ 516
Concord, City of, v. Norton ........ 477 Fordyce, Peperv ...... . ..... . ..... 516
Conrad, McMillan v ......... . . . ... . 128 Fourth Nat. Bank, Cruikshank v... 888
Continental L. Ins. Co., Hale v ..... 718 Franconia, The .... . . . . ........ . . . . 149
Cope v. Vallette Dry-dock C0 .... .. 924 Freeney v. First Nat. Bank . ....... 4353
Copes, Gaylor v ,_,,... . . . .......... 49 Frelinghuysen v. Baldwin .......... 452
Cotzhausen, Kerling v...... . ..... . 705 Fuchs, Washburn & Moen Manuf’g
Coupe v. Weatherhead ....   .... 673 Co. v ........................... . 661
(lowdreyv. Town of Caneadea ..... 532 Fuchs, Washburn & Moen Manuf’g
Crandall v. Goodrich ’l`ransp.··C0 .   75 Co. v ........................... . 669
Cruikshank v. Fourth Nat. Bank. . . 888 Furs!. da Bradley Manuf’g Co., Man-`
Curtis, United States v ............ . 184 ny v . . . . . . . . ........ .. . . .. ...... 658
Cyclone, The, (two cases,).,........ 486
Garland, The .............. . . ...... 283
Dablman v. Jacobs ........ . .... .... 614 Gates, Washburn & Moen Manuf’g
Darlington Iron C0. v. Foote .... .. . 646 Co. v., (two cases,) ..... .   . .· ..... 661
David Dows, The ..... .. . . ... . ... .. 154 Gauss-Hunicke Hat Co., The, v. Her-
Davis, Shuterv ..... ............... 564 man ........... . .... ............ 812
Debris Case, The ...... . ..... . ..... 25 Gaylorv.C0pes..........L......... 49
Denver & R. G. Ry. Co., Adams Geneva, The. .. .................... 874
Exp. Co. v .... . ................. 712 George L. Garlick, The, (two cases,). 703
Des Moines & M. R. Co. v. Alley. . . 73: G. G. King, The ........` . .... . ..... 921
Detroit, City of, Pequignot v. . .. ... 211 Gilmer v. City of Grand Rapids. .... 708
De Uriarte, Castro v ............ ... 93 Goodbar v. Cary ............ . ...... 316
De Vignier v. City of New Orleans,. 11 Goodrich Transp. Co., Crandall v. . 75
D. Newcomb, The. . . r ....... . ...... 274 Graham v. Fire Ext. Manuf’g Co. . . 543
Doggett, Bassett do Hills Co., The, v. Graham, Fire Ext. Manuf’g Co. v . . 543
Herman .... .. . .. ......... .....·... . 812 Gran Canaria, The.  ...... . ...... 868
Dolcoath, The .... . ..... ..... . ...... 264 Grand Rapids, City of, Gilmer v .... 708
Dover, City of, Norton v. ... ... ...·. 477 Grand Republic, ’l‘he ..... · . . . ...... 424
Drexel v. Barney ........ . ... .... .. . 522 Gravelle v. Minneapolis & St. L. Ry. I
Driven-well Cases, The............. 387 Co........ .... . ...... ;.· ..... · .... 435
Dudley v. Sears .... .. . ... . ..... .... 335 Gray v. Tapensleeve Pulley Works. 436
Duif v. Bindley ...... .... .... ...... 178 Greenwalt v. Duncan ........ . .... . 35
Duncan, Greenwalt v.... .... ...... 35 Greenwalt v. Duncan..... ..... .... 612
Duncan, Greenwalt v ...... .... . .·..» 612 Greenwood Cemetery, Blake v ...... 676
, 1 Gresham, Blackham v. Q .... . . .   .. 609
E. B. Ward, The.... .... ...... ...-.. 255 Griesche,Washburn&rhloenManuf’g ·
El1isv.No1·t0n ..... ... ....... ...... -4 Co. v .................. .......... 669
Elmira, The ............... . ....... 133 Gundy, Reber v .... .. ... . . ... . ... .. 801
Empresa Maritima a Vapor v. N. & · ’ ~ —
S. Amer. SteamNav. Co .... . ..... 502 Haas, Branchv.................... 53
Ewing, In re .... . ....... ........... 753 Hadji, The ......   ....... . ..... . 861
Excel1ent,The.... .... .. ........... 148 Hailes v. Albany Stove Co. . ..» ...... 240
Hale v. Continental L. Ins. C0.. .... 718
Fick, Pac. Coast M. & M. Co. v..... 348 Halkyard, Smith v .............. . .. 414
Field v. Herman ...... . ........ ... . 812 Hall v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.. ......... 744
Field, United States v.   .. .... ... . 778 Hamilton, Baltimore & O. R. Co. v.  181
Field, Weaver v ........ . .... . ...... 22 Harbison, New York —& Charleston ~
Fire Extinguisher Manuf’g Co. v. ~ Steam-ship Co, v .... . . ...... . . . . 681
· Graham ................,...... .. 543 Harbison, New York & Charleston
Fire Extinguisher Manuf'g Co., Gra- Steam-ship Co. v. . ..... . . ........ 688
ham v ................. . ......... 543 Hardin v. Jordan ...... . ..... .. .... 823
First Nat, Bank, Freeneyv. ... ..... 433 Hasbrouck, Lansburgh v... ... ...... 566
Fischer v. Hayes ........... ........ 469 Hatch, Riggs v ......... .. .......... 838
Fischer v. Neil ........ .. ........... 469 Hawkins, Stinson v.. .~. .... ..—.... .. S50
Fischer v. Shaugnessy ..... . .... .... 469 Hayes, Fischer v. ........... · ....... 469
Fisher v. Kelsey ....... . ..... . . ..... 71 Henderson, Wadsworth v ........... 447
Fitch v. Bragg & Co. .............. 243 Herman, Clark v. ....... . .......... 812