cssms nnsoxvmm Ria
Page ( A Page
Herman, Field v....... .-,... . ...... 812 ( Mannyvv. OSvler._... . ..._..,.. .;... ., ... 658
Herman, Kendall v ........... ....... 812 Manny v. t. Louis Mslleable Iron
Herman, Sweetv ......... ... ....   812- Co .... . ....... ...................658
Herman,The Doggett,`Bassett & Hills . · Manville v._Karst_. ... . ..,... .,._.. .... 173
C0. v. ................. . .......... 812, Mauville v. Karst.................. 644
Herman,'l‘he Gauss-Hunicke Hat C0. McCaull v. Braham .... . ... . ... . . .. 87
v ....... V. .... . ....... .. .... ..   812 McMillan vv. Conrad..... .....‘...._..,,12£
Herman, Weil v. ............ . ..... 812 McMurray v. Miller. ... .... .,......, 471
Hoboken, City of, v. Penn. R. Co.. . 816; McNichol v._Phelps_. .,_ ............. _ ,8
Holmes v. Sherwood ..... .... ...... 725 Memphis & C. R. Co., Robinson v.. 57
Hovey, Andrews v .......... .. . .... 387 Merchants Exchange Mut. _, Ben. _. V,
Huddell, In re .............. ... .... 373; Soc., Madeira v .... . ...... . ...... 749
Hungerford, Wakeman v ...... . .... 741 Merchants' Mut. Ins. C0., Baker v.. 916
Huntington v. Little Rock da Ft. S. · Merchants` Mut. Ins. Co., Brum v.. 140
R. Co., (two cases,) ..... . ... ...... 906 Meriden F. lns. Co., Turner v.... .. 454
. 4 _ ` , _ Metcalf, Pac. Ry. Imp. C0. v....... .·(
Illinois Cent. R. Co., State ex rel.v.. 881 Metcalf, Wade v .... . . ... .. .... .... 130
Illinois, State of, v. Chicago, B. ds · Miller vl Kent ..... ...,,....... ...... 13
,Q.,R,_Co ..... ... ....... . ....... 706 Millerv`. Pickering,.,.............. 540
Illinois, State of, v. Ill. Cent. B. Co. 881 Miller, McMurray v. ... .....,...,. . , 471,
India, The ...... QL. .. ........ . ..... 262 Minges, United States v .... .... .... 657
Indiana, ex rel, v. Pullman Pal. Car Minneapolis & St. L. Ry. C0.-, Gra- , 1
Co ...... .. ..................   193 velle v..,. ...... . ............... 435
Iron Silver Min. Co. v. Sullivan. . ... _829 Mississippi Valley Transp. Co.,, Sun . ·
Iron Silver Min. Co.,United States v.. 810 Mut. Insl Co. v .... . .... .,. .. .... 802
. 4 Mitchell, Senter &“ Co. v ..... .. . . .. . 20
Jacobs, Dahlman v ....... .. .... . .. . 614 Mobile`Savings Bank v. Patty ...... 751
Jameson, United States v. .... ...... ,331 Molenbrockv. St. L. & C. Pkt. C0.. 878
Johnstone v. Robinson .... . ...... . . 9.03 Moline Wagon Co., Aram v.. . ..... 236
Jones v. Welling .... .... ...... ..... 655 Mo_ore_v.,Lawrence ..... ........... 87
Jordan, Hardin v. ... . ...... .... ...,823 orehouse, Wickham v. ...... ...... 324
1 ' ” l` Mosgrove, Beachv .... A............. 305
Kaldenberg, Zeun v ....... . ....... . 539 Mott v. Sun Mut. lns. Co .......... 140
Kaltmeyer, United States v. . . .. . ... 760 Munford, Brown v ...... .. ...... ... 175
Kansas, City of, Blanchardv. ...... 444 Munford, United States v ..... . ...., ,164
Karst, Manville v.   ........ . . . . ... 173 Munford, United States v .,,... . . .... 223
Karst, Manville v ....   ............ 644 Munsonv. City of New York ..... .. @60
Katzenberger v. City of Aberdeen. .. 745 Mut. U. Tel. Co. v. Citv of Chicago. 06
Kelsey, Fisher v ......... ,.., ....... 71 Myers v'. Union Pac. Ry. C0.. ..... . 292 .
Kendallv. Herman ..... ........... 812 ` , `, . Q.·
Kent, Miller v .... . ......... , . . . . . . 13 Nashua, City of, Norton v ,, . ..·. . . .; 477
Kerlingv, Cotzhausen ..... . ..... Q. . 705 Neil, Fischer v.`,`.`. .,. . ..., ;... . .._, #39
Kilpatrick, United States v. ........ 765 Neis vi Yocum ..... `. ....... ... .... 168
Knickerbocker L. Ins. C0.,Sides v.. 650 New Orleans, B. R.     R. Co., . _ .
“ Bates`v.`,'.`.`.. .... .§..L .... ,...`.Q. 294
Lansburgh v. Hasbrouck .... . ......, 566 New Orleans, City of,' De Vignier v. 11
Lawrence, Moore v..'. ........, , .,,, ,87 New "Orleans, · City of,,, Folsom .
Lisso, Clailin v ....... . .... . . . .L .... 897 Brothers 'v .... . ........ . ........ 11
Little Rock ‘& Ft. S. R. Co., Hunt- V NewYork,` City of, Munson v ...... 560
ington v., (two eases,).... ....... ,. 906 New York & Charleston Steamyship ` .
Long v. The Progresso. ........ ...,. '491· ,Co. v.' Harbison .............. ,.. 681
Long v. The Tampico ..... . ........ _ 491 NewYork `& Charleston Steam-ship, ‘ L
L0uisiana`State Lotter Co.v."Clark. 20 `Col v. Harbison_,.... ...... . .... V. 688
Lovejoy, `Sch0ol·dist. N0. 13 v`. . ... 323 Norman, The ........ . ..... .. ...... 879
` . . North Bloomneld Gravel Mining Co., ._ .
Madeira v. Merchants' Exchange . Woodruff v.. ............ " ........ . 2s
Mut. Ben. Soc ....... ` ............ 749 North & S. Amer. Steam 'Nav. Co., .
Magowan v. St. L. Ry. Supplies Empress Maritimaa Vapor v. .... 502 `
Manuf’g‘Co .... .   ............... 738 Norton, City of Concord v. f .· .. .... 477 "
Manchester, City of, Norton v.. . ... 477 Norton, City of Dover v .... .. . . .... 477
Manhattan L. Ins. C0., Sheerer v. .. 720 Norton, City of Manchester v.....LQ 477
Manny v. Furst & Bradley Manuf’g · Norton, City of Nashua v... . . .... .. 477
Co........ .... .................. 65SlNQl`t0l1, City 0f Portsmouth·v...;.. 477