ill GABEB BEPORTED. Page ( _ Page N0rton,Ellig-v ,,,,, ,, , ,.,, ,.__ 4}S0h6ll,Bart€lsv.....A....`..{....... 341 (School·tlist. No. 13 v. Lovejoy . .... 323 Oregon Ry., & Nav. Co., United Scoggin, Burns v ............ . ..... 734 States v. .... .>. ..... . ....... . ..... 524 Sears, Dudley v .................... 335 Orient, The. . ........ . ...... , .. 916 i Sellers, Siemens v ............ . ..... 856 Ouachita & Mississippi River Packet E Senter & Co. v. Mitchell ............ 206 Co, v. Aiken ...... . .... . ....... 890 l Shancl,The ............ ~ ............ 57o Owensboro, City of, Claybrook v. . . 297 ( Shaugnessy, Fischer v. ............. 469 Oyler, Manny v ........ . _ .......... 658 Shearer v. Manhattan L. lns. Co ..., 720 Sherwood, Holmes v ......... . ..... 725 Pacino Coast M. & M. Co. v. Fiek.. 348 Shuter v. Davis ........ .. .......... 564 Paciiic Coast M. & M. Co v. Spargo. 348 Sides v. Knickerbocker L, ins. Co.. 650 Paciiic Mail Steam-ship C0., People ( Siemens v. Sellers ............... . . . 856 ex rel. v ..... . ...... . ........ 344 Simmons Hardwa.re Co., Washburn Paciiic Ry. Imp. Co. v. Metcalf ..... 7) & Moen Manuf’g Co. v., (two Palmer v. Wardens and Vcstrymen cases,) ..... . ................... 661 of St. Stephen’s Church. ......... 742 I Simonson, Wooster v ...... . . ...... 680 Patty, Mobile Savings Bank v ...... 751 ( Simplot v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Peck, Barney v., (two cases,) ....... 413 , Co ........................... 350 . Pelham, Town of, v. The B. F. ( Smith v. Halkyard ..... . ..... . ..... 414 Woolsey .................. . .... 418 ( Smith, ln re. ............... . ...... 465 Pennsylvania, etc., Co., Riggs v .... 804 , Snow v. Texas Trunk R. R ......... 1 { Pennsylvania R. Co., City of Ho- Sophia Hanson, The .... . ......... 144 boken v ............. . . . . ,....., 816 Sowles, United States v ...... · ··--· 536 People ex rel. v. Pac. Mail Steam- {Spargo, Pac. Coast M. & M. Co. v.. 348 ship Co . ......................... 344 , Spring Valley Water-works v. Bart- Peper v. Fordyce .................. 516 e lett .......... . .................,_ 615 Peper, Fordyce v .............. . .... 516 State v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. . .. 707 Pequignot v. City of Detroit. ....... 211 . State ex rel. v. lllinois Cent. R. C0. 881 Perkins v. U. S. Electric Light C0.. 513 , State ex rel. v. Pullman Palace Car Phelps, McNichol v. ............... 8 I Co .......................... .... 193 Phoenix Mut. L. Ins. C0. v. Walrath. 161 l Slate Ins. Co., In re. ............... 756 . Pickering, Miller v . ............... 540 Stevens, United States v ............ 101 Plant v. Anderson ............... . . 914 , Stewart Rubber Co., In re . . . .... .. . 220 Plattsmouth Bank, Freeney v ...... 433 ( Stinson v. Hawkins. ..... . ......... 850 Polynesia, The ....... . ....... . .... . 702 ~ Stowell, Allis v .................... 783 Portsmouth, City of, Norton v. ..... 477 1 Sullivan, Iron Silver Min. Co. v ..... 829 Proctor v. Brill ................... 791 I Sun Mut. Ins. Co. v. Mississippi Val- · Progresso, The, Long v .........,., 491 ley Transp. Co ...... .. . . ........ 800 Public Grain do Stock Exchange v. bun Mut. Ins. Co., Mott v .......... 140 West. U. Tel. C0 ................. 289 Sweet v. Herman .............. . . .. 812 Pullman Pal. Car Co., State ex rel. v. 193 Syracuse Screw Co , Armstrong v... 168 Rahway, City of, White v ......... . 833 Tampico, The, Long v ....... . ...... 491 Reber v. Gundy. ..... . ........... . S01 Taper-sleeve PulleyWorks, Gray v.. 436 Rediield, Bartels v ..... . . .......... 336 Texas Trunk R. R., Snow v ........ 1 Reese v. Third-avenue R. Co. ...... 368 Third-avenue R. Co., Reese v ...... 368 Riggs v. Hatch .... .. .... . ..... 838 Tiernay, United States v ..... . .... . .. 513 Riggs v. Penn. & N. E. R. Co ...... 804 Tommy, The ...................... 601 Robinson v. Memphis & C. R. C0. . . 57 Town of Caneadea, Cowdrey v ...... 532 Robinson, Johnstone v ...... . ...... 903 Town of Pelham v. The B. F. Wool- Rochereau, Carey v. ........ . ...... 87 sey .... . ..... . .. ......... . ...... 418 Rondeau, Unite States v .......... 109 Turnbull v. Citizens’ Bank. ........ 144 Turner v. Meridan F. lns. C0.. .·... 454 St. Louis Malleable lron Co., Man- Tuscumbia, City of, Bridgford v. . .. 910 ny v ........... . ....... . ......... 658 Two Marys, The ................... 697 St. Louis Ry. Supplies Manuf’g Co., Magowan v.. ............. . ...... 738 Union Pac. Ry. Co., Hall v.. ....... 744 St. Louis & C. Pkt. Co., Molenbrock Union Pac. Ry. Co., Myers v. ...... 292 v. ...... . ..... . ........... .. . . 878 United States v. Antz ........ . . .... 119 St. Stephen’s Church, Palmer v .... 742 United States v. Bader. ............. 116 Samuel J. Christian, The, (seven United States v. Bayaud ............ 376 cases). ...... .. . . . .. .. . .......... 796 { United States v. Campbell .......... 233