CASES REPORTED.
ARRANCED UNDER THEIR RESPECTI VE CIRCUITS ·
AND DISTRICTS.
Page 1*89
FIRST Q[B(]U]T_ Cmcnrr Cormr, E. D. Nmw-Yom:.
Blake v. Greenwood Cemetery ...... 676
CIRGUIT COUMK D- MAB$ACHUSm`TB· Greenwood Cemetery, Blake v. .. . .. 676
City of Concord v. Norton ........ . . 477
City or lnlover v. Norm ............ 477 D”"’*’°*` 0°”"· E- D· NEW Y°‘“‘·
ity o anchester v. Norton ...... 477 .
City of Nashua v. Norton .......... 477 g°§”`g°   g;"1‘°k· Th€# NWO °°'S°S’)  
City of Portsmouth v. Norton ...... 477 O Y“°?“G 3*     · ·‘‘‘ ,   '''‘'‘'‘
gqietcalf, Wade v ..... . ............. 130 8*2*2;;) · uns "m¤ °> (“"°“ 796
orton City of Concord v. ........ 477 . · ··•‘'‘‘‘‘‘ ‘ ‘'‘'‘ ‘ ‘’''' ‘· ° _
Norton: city of Dover V,. ......   477 ¤¤r>h¤¤ He¤S¤¤· TM ·-·-- - ····-···· *44
Norton, City of Manchester v ....... 477
Norton, City of Nashua v.. ......... 477 CIRCUIT COURT, N. D. NEW YORK.
Norton, City of Portsmouth v . ..... 477
Wade v. Metcalf ....... . ........... 130 Albany Stove Co., Hailes v. . .   . ... 240
Armstrong v. Syracuse Screw 0.. . . 168
CIRCUIT COURT, D_ RHODE ISLAND Bates v. New Orleans, B. B., dc V. R. 294
. . oowdr-ey`}: ’r6wA'E>r`o}¤Tnéadéé;::;Z sez
g;?1E;a:j'vg;?:E8;P??g`_'_°_'_           Hailes v. Albany Stove Co .......... 240
Meridan F. ins. Co., Turner v ...... 454 New O"1°““S» · R & V· R· C°·= 294
Smithv_Ha1ky.ard____ _________ ____ 414 B81C8V.......:.. ............ .... 6
a—um.~ v. Mmm F. im. Co ....... a4 S7¤¤¤¤S¤ Bmw ¤<>-· M¤·¤¤¤¤g v--- 1 8
wvttnmttad, Coupe V ............. 673 l 'F¤w¤ Of ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤· ¤<>w¤¤¤y v ·-···· 532
Drsrmor Coznvr, N. D. New Yom:.
SECOND CIRCUIT' Aldriolg In re. ., .... . ...... . ....... 369
David ows, The ......... .. . ...... 154
Cmcorr Connr, D. Conumcrronr. Flower City, The ...... . ........... 866
Stewart Rubber Co., In re .... . . .... 220 .
Bragg & Co., Fitch v ............. . 243
Fitch v.— Bragg & C0 ............... 243 t
H:grbison,hNew York & Charleston CIRCUIT COURT' S' D` NEW YORK
team-s ip Co. v. ............... 688 .· _
New YM ·*‘¤ €>¤==¤1¤¤t¤¤ S*¤¤¤¤·¤Mv AHTZKEZQ 6T.? PY .Y1.*iY1?lf°.f'iI}°iY' ans
(.0. v. Harb1son ................. 688 ADg]0_Amm._ Roofing Coq Amen
Iron Co. v ....................   915
Drsrmcr Comm, D. Connmcricnr. Barnes v. Vetterlein ...... . ......... 759
Barney v. Peck, (two cases,) ........ 413
Harbison, New York do Charleston Bartels v. Redfield ....... . ......... 336
Steam-ship Co. v ............   681 Bartels v. Schell ................... 341
New York & Charleston Steam·ship Bayaud, United States v ...... . ..... 376
Co. yé Hgrhisoxh .......... . ...... 681l Berney, Drexel v. .................. 522
v. — ED.— (xv)