CASES REPORTED. xvii Page Page Sellers, Siemens v ................ .. 856 Fire Extinguisher Manufg Co., Gra- Siemens v. Sellers .,........ . ........ 856 ham v ........................... 543 Graham v. Tire Ext. MED-l1f’& Co. . . 548 Disrmcr Couivr, E. D. Pmmsvnvanin. g;25;';;lFg;,£§érgIg;°gt {fgé vv· · _ Agnes R. Bacon, The, (two cases,) . . 480 A ghairles A. Sparks, The ............ 480 _ u dell, In re ................. .... 373 · Norman, The ...... . ......... . ..... 879 FIFTH CIRCUIT" C C M. D. A . Cmcuxzr Counm, W. D. Pnimsvnvsnia. mmm OUMU LABAMA B h . H ....... . ............ *3 Grey v- Taper-¤l¢¤v¤ Pulley W<>rk¤ 436 nm? nilmciias .................... Zz Gundy, Reber v ................... . 801 Morehouse, Wickham v ............ 324 C C N D A Reber v. Gundy ..... . ........... . 801 UKUUIT UUMV · · LABAML Taper-sleeve Pulley Works, Gray v. 436 Anderson · - Plant v ..... , . .......... 914 Wickham v. Morehouse ........ .... 324 Bridgfm_d·{hlO“y of Tuscumbmnn 910 B . 't ..... .. ... ....... 900 Drsrmcr Counm, W. D. Pnnusrnvimm. ,3 §·us%1:D$,h• Buds-ford v ____ 312 t . ‘ . ... .... . ........ 1 Bindleyi Dl1Hv"" ‘°" """ *•"•' 178 WT1I;h0TB:;gWg.mV(a?....· .•»» •••. •••• 900 D. ewcomb, The .......... .. ...... 274 E€`iif2€t.Bi'L(;]? iii DMMGT <><>¤M» S- l>· F¤<>¤¤>»~· Dolcoath, The ........ . ............ 264 .G. G. King, The ................... 921 FOURTH CIRCUIT. Cmourr Ooum, E. D. Loursrsmi. CIRCUIT COURT- D· M·*RYLAND· Aiken, Ouachita & Mississippi River MpM¤»»yv-Milla--· -·-»·....· M ...E’.;?‘i3*I..‘5;‘.a‘é,e;.;z.;.·.::::::1:::::2:: ${3 Miller, McMurray v ......... . ...... 471 Bmw, United mama it ,,,, ,,,,..,, 116 'Baker v. Merchants’ ut. ns. Co... 916 DISTRICT Coumi, W. D. Noivra Cano- Brum v. Merchants’ Mut. Ins. Oo .... 140 LENA. Carey v. Rocliereau .... 1.1. . ......... 87· 0itizeus’ Bank, urnhu v. ......... 145 V Kilpatrick, United States v. .. ...... 765 City of New Orleans, De Vignier v.. · 11 United States v. Kilpatrick ......... 765 City of New Orleans, Folsom. Br0th— il ers v ...... . ..................... Clailin v. Lisso ..... . . .............. 897 CIRCUIT C0URT’ D' SOUTH CAROLINA` Clark, Louisiana State Lottery Co. v. 20 Minges, United States v .......... .. 657 ggggsvcgggtse DYYUUUK U°· ····• 93; United States v. Mxnges ............ 657 Delyiémcr Wrgity of New Orlcansu 211 E. . ’ -1 .... . .............. " ¤¤¤¤¤¤ CMM. E- D- Vr¤<¤lm· nXce1i§¤°iUri.¤.? ................... iis ' ............. . ...... 2 Brown v. Munford .......... . ...... 175 £igi;%§Q\g3:,2?,2I2 v_ City gf Ngw 0;-- M¤¤l<>¤l» B¤>w¤ v ··--·--·------··- 175 new .......... .. ................ 11 Munford, United States v .......... 164 Gaylmv COPOS ________ _ _ _ _________ 49 M¤¤f<>¤l. U¤ll<=