xviii cases anroarnn.
rage Paste
Rondean, United States v. .... ..... 109 Christian, Bowen v ......   ...... 729
Sun Mut. Ins. Co., Mott v. ..... . .. . 140 City_of Detroit, Pequignot v ........ 211
Turnbull v. Citizens’ Bank. . ..... .. 145 Elmira, ’l`he ......,................ 133
United States v. Antz .............. 119 MONICIIOI v. Phelps. ............... 8
United States v. Bader. ...... . ...... 116 Pequign ot v. _City of Detroit. ....... 211
United States v. Rondeau ........... 109 l·’helps, MeNieh0l v. ............... 8
United States v. \Vright .... . ....... 112 W. B. Castle, The .................. 927
Vallette Dry-dock Co., Cope v ...... g2g
Vinoenz Pinotti, The ........ . ..... 2 . _ _ _ M _
Weaver v. Field ......... . .... . ..... 22 DISHHCT COUPT’ E D ICHIGAN
Wf1ght,UHltGd Statesv.... .... .... 112 Gm.]andIT1IB_I._U ·_-I-. I ___ ____" 283
Drsrarcr Coum, N. D. Mrssrsstrrr. CIIICUII. CCUIITI W_ D_ MICUICAII
Cary Goodbarv ..... . .............. 316 CII fG d R, ·d C] _   708
G0Od’b8.1‘ V. Cary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316 GIIKIIEI. v_r?£I_y 0g%r;Ud1]g1g§d;_·_ _ __ 708
Drs·mrc1· Cotmrr, lt. D. Mrssrssrrrr, E. D. CIRCUIT CCUII,I._ W_ D_ TENNESSEE_
City of Aberdeen, Katzenherger v... 745 · k I i ·
Kataenberger v. City of Aberdeen... 745 §;IIipg€g(£K§r   CIS; §Q%CI?;?,i   622
M<>b·1¤$¤vz¤zS Bank v· Pwr ----·- 751 notiusim V. Memphis a o. R. oO... 57
P¤*¤Y· M<>b1l¤ $¤V¤¤@sS Batik V ----·· 751 Sides v. icniokemocker L. ms. oo., 650
Stevens, United States v .... . . ...... 101
Cmcorr Connr, E. D. Tnxas. United States v. Stevens. .... . ..... 101
Burkett, Withers v ................ 86
Withers v. Burkett .... . ..... . ..... S6
SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
I Cmourr Cotmr, N. D. Tnxns. C C N D I
mcmr ourvr, . . LLINOIS.
Adams v. Addington. . ............. 89
Addington, Adams v .............. . 89 A.ram v. Moline VVagon C0 .... . .... 236
Ellis v. Norton . .............. , ,,,, 4 Chicago, R. & Q. R. Oo., Statev .... 706
Lawrenee, Moo1·e v .... . ............ 87 City of Chicago, Mut. U. T. Co. v.. 309
Metcalf, Pac. Ry. Imp. Co. v ..... . . 7 Cotzhansen. 1{erling v ............. 705
Moore v. Lawrence ......... . ...... 87 Hardin v Jordan.. .... . .... . ..... 823
Norton Ellis v ....... . ......... . . . 4 , Illinois Cent. lt. Co., State ex rel.v. . 881
Paeiiic Rv. Imp. Co. v. Metcalf ..... 7 Jordan, Hardin v .................. S23
Snow v, Texas Trunk R, R, ,,,, , , , 1 Kerling v. Cotzhausen .............. 705
Texas Trunk R,. R., Snow v ........ 1 Moline Wagon Co., Aram v .... . . . . 236
Mut. U. Tel. Co. v. Citv of Chicago 309
Palmer v. Wardens and Vestrymeu
fSt.St l ’ Ch l .......... 742
SIXTH CIRCUIT- Pdhlio Grgiiugrl sStocEr(Eirehange v.
West. U. Tel. Co ................. 289
Cmcurr Cotmr, D. Knnruoxv. State v. Chicago, B. Sa Q. R. (gg. . .. 706
State ex rel. v. Illinois Cent. . Co. 881
Henderson, Wadsworth v ........... 447 Wardens and Vestrymen of St. Ste-
Manhattan L. Ins. C0., Sheerer v. .. 720 pherrs Church, Palmer v ..... . . . . 742
Sheerer v. Manhattan L. Ins. C0 .... 720 Western U. Tel. Co., Public G. & S.
· Wadsworth v. Henderson .......... 447 Exeh. v ...... . ................... 289
Drsrarctr Comvr,   Kimwncrrv. Drsrmcr Courvr, N. D. I1.LLNo1s.
City of Owensboro, Clavbrook v .... 297 * State Ins. Co., In re ................ 756
Claybrook v. City of Owensboro .... 297
Cmoorr CoUn·r,‘D. INDIANA.
Cmcvrr Courvr, E. D. MICHIGAN. -
_ _ Ewing, In re .... . .... . ............. 753
Bowen v. Christian ,.... . ......... 729 ` Pullman Pal. Car Co., State ex rel. v. 193