CASES REPORTED. xix
Page Page
State ex rel. v. Pullman Palace Car Iron SilverMin. Co.,United States v.. 810
Co .............................. 193 Johnstone v. Robinson .......... . . . 903
Kendall v. Herman .............. .. 812
. . . o inson Johnstonev ...... . ..... 903
C"‘°"“ °°"“T· E‘ D' W‘“"°"’“N‘ guiisvaainoa Silver Mm. co. v ..... 829
ams v. Stowell ..,.. . .............. rss Wim V- °¤¤¤¤_ -—·-·--·------···· 812
Crandall v. Goodrich Transp. Co . . . 75 I{”}°“ B“°· RY· (’°·¤ H?" V-   ·-···· 744
in h T,., U _ J _ Cmndau v__ 75 Lmted States v.1ron Silver Mm. C0. 810
G00e c rsp (0, U. ,,
Phoenix Mut. L. lns. Co. v. Walrath. 161 mwd BWWS °X ml- V- Awlwsvn. T-
S GH Am V __ __ ___ _   783 &S.F.lty.Co ........ . .......... 853
tow,  V.1H_
Walrath, Phmnix Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. 161 l 0* V- mma'} ··-·····-·········• 812
Cmcurr Couirr, W. D. Wrscousnv. CIRCUIT COVE? D- IOWA- ·
Ut f W ( t ’ W (__ ________ 534 Alley Des Moines & M. R. Co. v.... 732
vltlév. 8a?0‘?{$.t..3§£.Y ....... .3. g,gg,g{;¤;¤»Sg;,0g,¤¤. v. my. .. gg; _
Sherwood, Holmes     725
EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Cmcorr Couar, N. D. Iowa, E. D.
Chicago, M. ia St. P. R . C ., Si -
Cmcorr Coeur, E. D. Anxmsas plot v ..... t ...........   .   ....  . 850
Sin plot v. Chicago M. Ju St. P. R .
Fordyce v. reper .................. 516 Co .............. , .......... .   350
gordyce, Peperlv.   . .I.{ .     .   516
untington v. itt e oc t. . .
R. Co., (two cases,) ............... 906 CIRCUIT OOUMB b' D' [0WA* C' D'
Limc Rock 66 Fi S· R- C¤·· Hm- 9 Anamwsvv new asv
ington v., (two cases,) ............ 06 · , _ ' , ‘`’’`‘`'‘'‘ ' '‘'''
Matcne11,se».m& co. v ............ 206 gf,‘Q’,§,§‘ gérgdjgse Tm   ·# ·······   _
· Peper v. Fordyce ..,............... 516 ‘ '‘‘‘''''''‘‘'  
Paper, Fordyce v ................... 516
Semer& Co. v. Mitchell ........... . 206 UIKCUIT COURT, D- KANSAS.
United States v. Waddell. .......... 221 _
Waddell, United States v .......... 221 EYFYS 1% U¤i(>¤ E30-SY. UG-- .·....  
mon ac. y. 0., yers v. ......
Cmeurr Counr, D. Cor.01:.x1>o. J l V
( Cmoorr Conner, D. Mrmvnsom.
Adams Exp. Co. v. Denver dz: lt. G.
Ry. Co ......   .............. 712 G¤¤v¤11<> v· Mi¤¤¤=¤p¤1i¤ dv St- L- Ry.
Atoms0n_ T_ 5, 5, F_ Ry; G0_` Uugted C0 ...... _. .... . . ... .............. 435
states ex re1.v.. ................ sas M¤¤¤¤¤p¤11¤ & bt L· Ry- ¤<>-, Gra-
Clark v. Herman ............ .. . . .. 812 relic V -····--··--··--·--···· ·.·· 435
Deéiver do R. G. Ry. Co., Adams
xp. Co. v ....   .............. 712 (g G E_ D_ M _
nrggea, Bassett at mus eo., The, v. mm °UM‘ ISSOUM
erman ......................... 812 Brainerd, Coburn ................ 412
Field v. Herman ..... . ,.... . ...... 812 Cape Girardeau 0;., United States
Gauss-Hunicke Hat (Jo., The, v. Her- ex rel. v ......................... 836
man .... . .............   ...... 812 Coburn v. Brainard .... . ..... . ..... 412
Hall v. Union Pac. Ry. C0. ......... 744 Conrad, McMillan v. .......... . .... 128
Herman, Clark v ............ .. .... 812 Dahlman v. Jacobs ..... . ........... 614
Herman, Field v ................... 812 Duncan, Greenwalt v .............. 35
Herman, Kendall v ........... . ..... 812 Duncan, Greenwalt v .......... . . . . 612
Herman, Sweet v ................... 812 Fisher v. Kelsey ............... . .... 71
Herman,The Doggett,Bassett & Hills Fuchs, Washburn do Moen Manuf’g
C0. v. ................ I ........... 812 Co. v .... . . .......... . ........... 661
Herman,'I`he Gauss-Humcke Hat Co. Fuchs, Washburn & Moen Manuf’g
v ....... . ._ ...................... 812 Co. v ............................ 669
Herman, Weil v. ......... _ ....... . . 812 Furst & Bradley Manuf’g Co., Man-'
Iron Silver Mm. C0. v. Sullivan. .... 829 ny v ........ . ............. . ..... 658