CASES REPORTED. Page Page Abbott, Price v. .......... I. .. 506 Blackman, United States v. . ... .... 837 Accounts Shipping Com’r, In re. ... 138 Blenheim, '1`he .......... . . ........ 608 Adams v. Crittenden. ..... . ........ 42 Bosquet, Huthsing v. ........... . . . 54 Adams v. Manufacturers' tt: Builders' ` Boston Marine ins. Co., Lunt v ..... 411 F. Ins. Co ................... 630 Bourne v. Ross .............. _ ...... 703 Adams v. Spangler ..... _ . .......... . 133 Boynton, Hartley v .......... . ..... 873 Algitha, The ........ . ............. . 551 Bradley & llubbard Manuf’g C0. v. Allen, Baltimore & 0. R. Co. v ..... 171 The Charles Parker Co ........... 240 American Bell Telephone Co. v. Dol- Brett v. Quintard ......... . ........ 529 bear .......... . ..... . ............ 604 Britton, United States v ...... . ..... 731 American Mortgage (Jo. v. Downing, Brown v. Evans ........... . ....... 912 (two cases,) ...................... 660 Brown,Maier v. .. . ............... . 736 Amie Min. Co., Little Pittsburgh Brown, Merchants' Nat. Bankv .... 161 Consol. Min. Co. v. ............. 57 Brown, Mowat v ................... 718 Ancon, The, v. Thompson .......... 742 Bryant v. Western U. Tel. Co ..... .. 825 Anderson v. Scotland .............. 667 Buckingham, Slessinger v .......... 454 Appel], Greenwald v. . . ............ 140 Buttalo German Ins. Co., \Villiams v. 63 Arcturus, The ........ . . . . . . ....... . 95 Burrow- Giles Lithographic C0., Arkansas, The ..................... 383 Sarony v .... . ................... 591 Armstrong, California Dry-dock C0. v .................. . ..... 216 Cadwell, In re ..................... 693 Arnoux & H. Elec. Co., Gramme Caine, Matteson v ...... . .......... 525 Elec. Co. v ............ ..... 838 California Artitieial Stone Pav. Co. Artt, Osgood’s Adxn’rs v.; ..... . .... 575 v. Freeborn ...................... 735 Ashcroft Manuf’g Co., Crosby Steam California Dry-dock Co. v. Arm- Gage & Valve O0. v ...... . ....... 85 strong ....... . .... . . ............ 216 — · Atchison, T. 8: S. F. R. Co., Nicker- Canima, The, (two cases,) .......... 271 son v .... . .............. . ........ 408 Carlsdotter v. The E. B. Ward, Jr.. . 456 Austin v. Rutland R. Co. . . ... . .. . . . 466 Castle, Grier v ...... . .......... . . . 523 Cavanagh, Emery v ......... .. .... . 242 Backus Water Motor Co. v. Tuerlc. . 350 Cavanagh, lilotlltt v ..... . ..... . .... 336 Balfour v, Sullivan ...... ...... 231 Central R. C0., I·`armcrs’ L. 5: T. Ball v. Winslow, (two cases,). ....... 608 Co. v ............ . ............... 758 Baltimore & O. lt. Co. v. Allen .... . 171 Cervin, The ..... . ..... . ........... 462 Bank of Commerce, Sleppy v ....... 712 Charles Parker Co., The, Bradley & Banks, United States v ........ . .... 322 Hubbard Manuf’g Co. v .......... 240 Barnhart, United States v ......... . 579 Charter Oak L. Ins. Co., Taylor v. . 566 Barrel], Tilton v. .................. 59 Chewett v. Moran ........ . ......... 820 Bartles v. Gibson .... . ........ 293 Chicago, Bn: Q. lt. Co., Miller v .... 97 Bartlett v. Smith .... . ............. 668 Chicago, B. & Q. R. C0., WalEcen— Bates v. Days. ........... . ......... 167 hauer v. ..... . ...... . . .... . ...... 136 Battle Mountain S. Co.,Itlanville v.. 126 Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co., Cun- Beebee, United States v ...... . ..... 36 ningham v .............. . ...... .. 882 Belden Mining Co., Manville v ..... 425 City of Alexandria, The. ..... . ..... 390 Bell v. Donuhoe. ..... . ............ 710 City gf New Orleans, Gaines v. ..... 16 Bell, Hollister v ................... 705 City of New Orleans, United States Bell, James v ................ . ..... 705 ex rel. v .......................... 453 Berkshire Nat. Bank, Yale Lock City of San Francisco, Ilamrn v. ..... 119 I»lanuf’g C0. v ...... . ......... ... 531 Clark Pomace-holder C0. v. Fergu- Bermuda, The ............ . . . ...... 397 son ...... . ....................... 79 Hisboe v. Evans .......... . . . . .... 474 Cleveland Rolling-mill C0.,Rl1odes v. 426 v.17—1`1zn.