XIV CASES REPORTED.
Pap Page
Ohio-Colorado Reduction & Mining St. Louis, H. & K. R. C0., Fogg v... 871
Co., Foster v .... . .... . .......... 130 St. Louis, 1. M. & S. Ry. Co., Mo-
Oscar Townsend, The .... . . . .. . .... 93 sher v. .......................... S80
Osgood’s Adm’rs v. Artt ...... ... . . . 575 St. 1.ouis& N. O. Transp. C0., Hiber-
Otto, Hicks v .... . ......... . ....... 539 nia ins. Co. v ............ . .. . . ... 478
Owens, United States v. ..... ...... 72 San Francisco, City of, Hamm v.. . . 119
Santa Clara Min. Ass’u v. Quicksil-
Packard, Gill v ....... ... ...... .... 399 ver Min. Co ..................... 657
Parker, \Vood v ........... . ....... 650 Sargent, Ivesv ....... . ............. 447
Parish of Tensas, Hollingsworth v. . 109 Saronyv.Burrow-Giles Lithographie
Patrick v. Leach. .................. 476 Co ........ . ..... ... ............. 591
Perkins, Phila. S.: R. R. Co. v ...... 606 Sawyer, Goodyear v ...... . ......... 2
Phenix lns. Co., Lynch v .......... 627 Scheu v. Grand Lodge, O. D., 1. F. . 214
Philadelphia & R. lt. Co. v. Perkins. 606 Schillinger v. Greenway Brewing C0. 244
Pltilatclelpliia tis R. R. Co. v. Warren School-dist. N0. 18, Tice v ......... 2e3
Foundry 8: lllachine Co .......... 606 Schreiber v. Sharplcss .... . . ........ 569
Pintsch, Washburne v. ............. 582 Schreiber v. Thornton. . ... . ... . ... 603
Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Rail Co. Scotland, Anderson v .............. 667
v. Hinckley ......... . ........... . 584 Seidenherg, United States v. . .. . . .. . 227
Platt, Mead v ...... . ............... 509 Selby Smeiting & Lead Co., McFar-
1·'latt,)lcadv.... ...... . .... . .... .. 836 1andv............... ...... ...... 253 —
Plock, Tcilman v .................. 268 Sessions, Cowell v.. .... . .......... . 450
Porter, Kelly v ...... . . ........ . . . . 519 Sharpless, Schreiber v ..... . . . . . . . . . 5:9
Porter Needle Co. v. Nat. Needle Shelley v. St. Charles Co ..... . ..... 909
Co ..................... ... ... . . . 536 Shipping Com’r, in re, Accounts of. 138
Price v. Abbott. ... .......... . . . ... 560 Simpson v. La Plata Mining tS: S. Co. 125
Price v. Colson .................... 506 Six Hundred Tons of iron Ore,
Price v. Davenport & St. P. R. Co. . 301 United States v ........... .. . . ... 137
Prickhardt v. Robertson. ..... . ..... 500 Sloppy v. Bank of Commerce. ...... 712
Pryzbylowicz v. Missouri River R. Slessinger v. Buckingham. . . . . . . . . . 454
C0 .... ...................... .... 492 Smallv.Montgomery.............. 805
Smith v. Craft. ..... . ....... . . . . .. . 705
Quicksilver Min. Co., Santa Clara Smith, Bartlett v ................. . 668
Min. Ass’n v ........ .. .. ...... .. 657 Smith, United States v ...... ...... 510
Quintard, Brett v .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529 Spangler, Adams v .... . ..... . ..... 133
Spare v. Home Mut. Ins. Co ..... ... 568
Ralston, United States v. . . . . . . .... 895 Sprague, Statiord Nat. Bank v. . .. . 784
Rand, United States v. ... .. .,...... 142 Sta11ordNat. Bank v. Sprag-te ..... 784
Randall v. Vcnable ................ 162 Starn, United States v. ........... . 435
Ransom, In re. . .. ........ ... ...... 331 State of Alabama, The ...... . .... .. 847
Reed, Myers v. ....... . . ... . . .... . . 401 Steiger, Worswick Manuf’g Co. v.. . 250
Reid, United States v. ............. 497 Stoddard, Dodds v ..... . . .. ........ 645
Rhodes v. Cleveland Rolling—mill Stowe, McKay v. ..... ... .... .. .... 516
Co .............. . ...... . . . ...... 426 Strauss v. Wilson ......... . . . . ..... 701
Rhode Island, The ................. 554 Strouss v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry.
Rintoul v. New York Cent. & H. R. Co. ..... . ........... . ........... 209
R. Co .... . ..... ,. .. .... ... ...... 905 Snittcr, Liverpool Ji: G. 1V. S. Co. v. 695
Roberts. Mitchell v.... ............ 776 Sullivan, Balfour v.... .... . ....... 231
Robertson, Moser v .... .. .......... 500 Sun Nut. ins. Co. v. Mississippi
Robertson, Prickhardt v. . . . .. . .. ... 500 Valley Transp. Co .... . . . ... . . . . . 919
Robertson, Titfany v ....... . ....... 500
Ross v. Fuller. . . ............... ... 224 Taylor v. Charter Oak L. Ins. C0... 566
Ross, l¥···irnc v. ........ . ..... . . .... 703 Tetlman v. Plock .................. 268
Rust, 't ...s & St. L. Ry. Co. v. .... . 275 Tensas, Parish of, Hollinguvorth v. 109
Rutland R. Co., Austin v ...... . .... 466 Texas & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Rust ...... 275
Rutten v. Union 1’ac. Ry. Co ....... 4:0 Thompson, The Ancon v ..... . ..... 742
Ryan, Holland v ............. . .... . 1 Thornton, Schreiber v. ............. 603
Thurston v. Howard [ns. Co ..... . . 127
Sachs, Goldsmith v ....... . ......... 726 'l`hurston v. 1\lerchants’ Ins. Co. ... 127
Sat-hs, White v., (two cases,). .... . . 726 Thurston v. Metropol lns. C0 .... .. 127
St. Charles County, Shelley v ....... 909 Thurston v. Union [ns. C0. ........ 127
St_ Louis Boom & Imp. Co., Duluth Tice v. School-dist, No. 1S. . ... .... . 283
Lumber Co. v ...... . ....... . ..... 419 Titfany v. Robertson ...... . ........ 500