CASES REPORTED. ` xv Pam I Page Tilton v. Harrell .... . ........ .. .... 59 · Urner v. Kavton . ..... . ....... .... . 539 Town of Utica, Wrought-iron Bridge Urner v. Kayton ................... 845 Co. v ...... . . ........... 316 Utica, Town of,Wrought-iron Bridge Town of Waltliv·icl<, Morgan v ...... 2861 Co.v........ .......... .... ...... 316 '1`readway, Nevada Bank of Sar; l Francisco v ....... . .............. 887 Van Dolsen v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y. 817 Tuerk, Backus Water Motor C0. v.. 350 Venahle, Randall v .......... . ..... 162 Tuttle, United States v. ... .... .... 561 Venus, The ........... . ........... . 925 Vermont & C. lt. Co., Hazard v .... 753 Union Ins. Co., Hedgerv ..... . ..... 498 Union Ins. Co., Thurston v .... . 127 1Vahash, St. L. ds 1*. Ry. Co., Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Kansas City Stronss v ........................ 209 Elevator Co. ............,........ 200 Waldwiek, Town of, Morgan v. . .. , 236 Union Pac. Ry. C0., Kansas City Walkenhauer v. Chicago, B. & Q. Elevator C0. v ..... . ............. 200 B. (Jo ........ .. . ............ .... 136 Union Pac. Ry. Co., Leo v .... . ..... 273 Warren, The ........... . .......... 704 Union Pac. Ry. Co., Miller v ,...... 67 Warren Foundry &. M. Co., Phila. & Union Pac. lty. C0., ltutten v...... 480 lt. lt. Co. v ..... . ...... . ..... .... 606 United Nickel C0. v. Melchoir .... .. 3-10 Washburne v. Pintseh ...... . ...... 582 United Nickel C0. v. New Home S. \Vaterbury v. New York C. & H. R. M. Co .................. ...... 528 lt. Co. ............... . ........... 671 United States v. Banks. . . ...... .... 322 \Vatson, United States v .... . . . . .. . 145 United States v. Barnhart .... . ..... 579 Western U. Tel. (Jo., Bryant v ...... 825 United States v. lleehee .... ..... 36 West Portland Homestead Ass’n v. United States v. Blackman. . . . . . . . . S37 Lownsdale. . ...... . ............. 205 United States v. Britton ...... . .... 731 West Portland Homestead Ass’n v. United States v, Cota ...... . ....... 734 Lownsdale. . . . .................. 614 United States v. Daulmer ...... .... 703 White, ln re .... . ............... ... 723 United States v. Douglas ......... .. 634 White v. Crow ............ . ........ 98 United States v. liarl. ....... ....... 75 White v. E. l’. Gleason Manuf’g Co. 159 United States v. Fielding... .... .... 572 White v. Sachs. (two cases,) . ....... 726 United States v. Gaylord. .... . .. .... 435 \Vhite, United States v.,(three cases,) 561 United States v. Ilanover .......... 444 Whitternore, Fitield v .............. 513 United States v. Iloivard ........... 638 \Vilcox X: G. S. M, C0. v. The Gib- United States v. Marquette, H. & O. hens Frame ..... . ..... . .... . ..... 623 · R. Co ................... . ....... 719 \Vilde, Goddard v ........... . ...... S45 United States v. Marshall S. Min. C0. 10S Wiley. Gold tt: Stock Tel Co. v, . ... 234 United States v. Martin ....... . .... 1.50 Williams v. Buttalo German ins. Co. 63 United States v. Owens . . .. . .. ..... 72 Wilson, llc Grau v ...... . . . .. ...... 698 United States v. Ralston . . .... ~ .... 595 \Vilson, Strauss v ............ . . .... 701 United States v. ltand ....... ....... 142 Winslow, Ball v., (two cases,) ...... 608 United States v. lteid ..... ... ...... 497 Winthrop lron Co., Meeker v...... 48 United States v. Seidenhery.: ........ 227 Wm. Murtagh, The ................ 259 United States v. Six llundrcd Tons \\’ood v. Packer ................... 6.50 of Iron Ore .... . ....... .. .... .... 137 Worswick Manuf’g C0. v. Steiger. . . 250 United states v. Smith. ............ 510l Wrought-iron Bridge C0. v. '1`otvn United States v, Starn . . . ....... ... 435 of Utica .................. . . ..... 316 United States v. Tuttle. ... . .... .... 561 United States v. Watson. ........... 145 Yale Lock Manuf'g Co. v. Berkshire United States v.\\'l1ite,(thrce eases,). 561 Nat. Bank ....... . .... .... ...... 531 United States ex reL v. City of New Orleans ............. . ............ 453 Zinsser v. Coolcdge ..... ... ..... ... 538 •