XVl1l CASES REPORTED. P¤§° Page Frazee y. Moilitt ................... 584 Robertson, Cunard Steam-ship Co. v. 147 Hugunin v. Thatcher ........ . ..... 105 Schell, Herman v. ....... . ....... .. 891 Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co., Snow v. 602 Seaman v. Slater ................... 485 Mofdtt, Frazee v .... . .... . ..... . . . . 584 Seligrnan, Austin v ............. . . . 519 Nellis, Van Deusen v .............. 596 Sixty-live Terra Cotta Vases, United New Jersey Steam-boat Co., Brock- States v ................... .. .... 508 _ ett v ................ . ........... 156 Slater, Seaman v ...... Q ....... .... . 485 New York Grape Sugar Co.v. Amer. Tanner, Olney v ..... . ..... . ....... 636 Grape Sugar Co ...... ....... 638 Tannhauser, Chittenden v. ........ 667 New York G. S. Co.v. Buffalo Grape Tannhauser, Cortes Co. v .... .. .... 667 Sugar Co ....................,... 638 United States v. Abrams. .... .. . .... 823 Rich v. Town of Mentz ............ 52 United States v. Gunning .......... 511 Shoots, Barker v ....... . ..... . ..... 647 United States v. McCarthy. ......... 87 Snow v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. 602 United States v. Sixty-five Terra. Thatcher, Hugunin v .... . ......... 105 Cotta Vases ..... . .......... . ..... 508 Town of Attica, Chandler v ........ 299 Vogeley v. Noel ................... 827 . Town of Mentz, Rich v ............. 52 Wheeler, Balfour v. . . .. ...... . . . . . . S93 Van Deusen v. N ellis . ............. 596 D Drsrmom Coonr, S. D. Nmw Yom:. 1 1 STR CT C°U’“`· N" D‘ N"' Y°"K‘ Aiatama, The ..................... 831 Casey, Ex parte .................... 86 Barnes, ln re .............. . ....... 158 Letchworth, ln re .................. 822 Bowen v. Decker ...... . ........... 751 M..]. Cummings, The .......... . 178 Brink v. Lyons .................... 605 ‘ Carl,The ..... . .................... 655 CIRCUIT COURT, S_ D_ NEW YORK City of Chester, The, (two cases,). . . 603 Cooper v. New Haven Steam-boat Abrams, United States v. ........... 823 Co ...... . . .. .................... 588 Austin v. Seligman ...... . ....... .. 519 Decker, Bowen v ..... . ............ 751 Balfour v. Wheeler. ..... . ......... 893 Doyle, ln rc ...... . ..... . .......... 369 Byron, In re ..... . .... . ...... . ..... 722 Easson, United States v ............ 590 Chittenden v. Tannhauser ..... . .... 667 Edwin H. Webster, The. ........... 724 Collins Co., The, v. Oliver Ames & Galvanized Wire, etc., Internat. Nav. Sons Corp ......... . . . . .......... 561 Co. v .................. .. . . ..... . 733 Cortes Co. v. Tannhauser .......... 667 Gillespie v. The Yosemite. . ........ 383 Cunard Steam-ship Co. v. Robertson 147 Greenpoint, The ........... . ....... 186 Donnelley v. lvers ................. 592 Hadji, The ......... . .............. 459 Dryfoos v. Friedman ......... . ..... 824 Internat. Nav. Co. v. Galvanized Dumont v. Fry .............. . ..... 578 Wire, etc. ..... . ..... . ........... 733 Du Pont v. N. P. R. Co ............ 467 Internat. Nav. C0., Wolft v., (two Fogg, Langdon v ........ . .....,... 5 cases,) ........ . .................. 733 Fox, Marks v ...................... 713 John E. Mnlford, The .............. 455 Friedman, Dryfoos v ............... 824 Kelly, In re . ........... . .... . ..... 528 Fry, Dumont v ..................... 578 Leng, United States v .............. 15 Gunning, United States v. .......... 511 Lyons, Brink v .................... 605 Herman v. Schell ............ . .... . 891 Marsland v. The Yosemite. ......... 331 Hofheimer, Lambert v ....... . ..... 654 Mary N . I-Iogan,The, United States v. 529 Ivers, Donnelley v ................. 592 Mayor, The, etc., Shields v ......... 748 Kent, Miller v. ......... . .......... 561 New Haven Steam-boat Co., Coop- Lambert v. Hofheimer ............. 654 e1· v ............. . ............... 588 Langdon v. Fogg .................. 5 Raymond, Scull V .............. 547 McCarthy, United States v. ........ 87 Regulus, The .............. . ....... 380 Manhattan Ry. Co. v. Mayor, etc., of Scull v. Raymond. ................. 547 New York ...... . ....... . . ...... 195 Secor, ln re . ............... . ..... 319 Marks v. Fox ................. . .... 713 Seventy-six Thousand One Hundred Mayor, etc., of New York, Manhat- and Twenty-tive Cigars, United tanRy. Co. v .................... 195 States v. ........ . ............... 147 ’ Miller v. Kent ..... . ..... . . ........ 561 Shields v. The Mayor, etc .......... 748 Noel, Voge‘ey v .... . ..... . ........ 827 Syracuse, The. .............. . ..... 828 Northern Pac. Ry. Oo., Du Pont v.. 467 Thirty Thousand Cigars, United Oliver Ames do Sons Corp., The Col- States v ........... . ............. 147 lins Co. v ........................ 561 Trundy, ln re ...... . .......... . .... 607 Olney v. Tanner. .................. 636 Uncle Abe, The .................... 270