CASES REPORTED. X111 Page Page Hatch, Wallamet Iron Bridge Co. v. 347 Leahy v. Spaulding ................ 417 Hawkins, Blake v .................. 204 Lee, Brown v ...... . ........... . .. . 630 Hazard v. Durant, (two cases,) ..... 471 Leland, The .......... . ............ 771 Headley, Rocmer v ...... . ......... 205 Leo v. Union Pac. Ry. C0 .... . ..... 283 Heller v. Bauer .................... 96 Leonard v. Whitwill ............... 547 Hendryx v, Fitzpatrick ..... .. ...... 810 Leong Yick Dew, In re ........ . .... 490 Hicks v. Otto ...................... 749 Letchworth, In re ......... . .... . . . . 873 Himmer, Time Tel. Oo. v .... . ..... 322 Lewy, Astrup v ...... . ...... . ..... 536 Hoefner, Gibbs v ...... . ............ 323 Lewy v. Thu Exccllenzen Sibbern.. . 536 Holliday, Reed v ................... 325 Lloyd v. Miller ............... . .... 915 Home Mut. 1ns. Co., Sparc v ....... 14 Loomis, Barlow v ................ .. 677 Houge v. Woodruif ................ 136 Loring, Bakerv ............... . .... 127 Howard, Adams v ...... . .......... 317 Louchheim, Pollok v ..... . ......... 465 Howland Coal & l. Works, Well- Louisville & N. R. Co. v. R. R. Com. man v ........................... 51 of 'l`enn ......................... 679 Hull v. Dills .... . .......... . ...... 657 Louisville & Nashville R. Co., Wa1·- ing v ............................ 863 ‘ Illingworth v. Spaulding ......... . . 744 Lowe, In rc ........... . ............ 589 Imogene M. Terry, The ...... , ...... 463 Luekenback, The E ................ 847 Ireland, Field v .... . ............... 835 Lung Chung v. Northern Pac. Ry. Iron-clad Manuf’g C0., Matthews v. 321 Co ......................... . ..... 254 Lyman v. Maypole ................. · 735 James P. Donaldson, The .......... 264 Jay Cooke& Co., In re ............. 88 MacNaughton v. South. Pac. C. R. Jay Gould, The. ............... . . . . 765 Co ..................... . ..... . . . . 881 Jefferson, City of, Desmond v ...... 483 Maggie Ellen, The ........ . ........ 221 Jenks, Swift v. ........... . ........ 641 Malvin v. Wert ....... . ........ . 721 Jennie B. Gilkey, The ............. 127 Manchester & K. R. R., Bruce v .... 342 J erse City, First Nat. Bank of, Bank Manhasset, The .......... . ......... 430 . of Metrop. v ....... . ............. 301 Marble,Vermont Farm. Mach. C0. v. 307 lessup, In re ...................... 94 Marina, The. .. ..................... 760 Jewett, Doty v ...... . ....... ; .... 337 Marlor v. Texas & P. Ry. Co ....... . 867 Johnson, O. N., The ............... 782 Martin v. Baldwin .... . ..... . ...... 340 Jones v. Vestry of Trinity Parish. . . 59 Maryland, The ..................... 551 Jones, Nichols v. ..... . ............ 855 Mason v. Hartford, P. & F. R. C0. . 53 Joseph W. Gould, The ......... . . . 785 Matthews v. Green. ................. 649 Judge v. Anderson. ................ 885 Matthews v. Iron-clad Manuf’g Co.. 321 Judson, Gove v ....... . . ...... . ..... 523 Matthews v. Spangenberg .......... 823 J. W. Butler Paper Co., Chicago Maurer, Fryerv .................... 756 Music Co. v ............ , ......... 758 Mayor, etc., of New York, Mun- J. W, Dennis, The ..... . ........... 799 son v ..... . ...................... 313 Maypole, Lyman v ............ . .... 735 Kane, United States v .............. 42 McArthur v. Brooklyn Ry. Supply Kehlor, Kufcke v .................. 198 Co. . ........... . ................ 263 Keller, United States v ............. 633 McCord, Willianis v. ............... 643 Kellog v. Richardson. ......... . .... 70 Mcmphis,U.& N .W. Ry.Co.,Wa1serv. 152 Kennedy v. City of Sacramento ..... 580 Memphis & L. B. R. C0. v. Dow .... 388 Kirby, Pentlarge v., (three cases,). .. 501 Memphis & Ohio R. Pkt. Co., Whit- Kirby Bung Manuf’g Co., Pentlarge · tenton Manuf’g Co. v ....... . ..... 273 v., (three cases,). ................. 501 Mentz, Town of, Rich v ............ 725 Kirk v. Elkins Manuf’g & Gas O0. . . 417 Mercantile Mut. Ins. O0., Croswell v. 24 Kroft, Bradley v ................... 295 Mercantile Mut. Ins. Oo., Red Wing Kropif v. Poth ..... . . .. ........... 200 Mills v .......................... 115 Kufeke v. Kehlor ........ . ......... 198 Merrell, In re .................. . 874 Merriam, Searls v ..... . ......... . 815 La Grange, City of, Cole v ..... . .... 871 Merritt, Oelberman v. .............. 408 La Grange, City of, Sanford v ..... . 871 Middleton Paper Co. v. Rock R. Pa- Lahaina, The .......... . ........... 923 per Co ............. . ..... . ....... 252 Lake Shore & M. S. Ry., Simpkins v. 802 Miller, Exchange Nat. Bank v ...... 372 Lane, United States v .............. 910 Miller, Lloyd v ..... . ........... .. . . 915 Lapp v. Van Norman. ............. 406 Mississippi Mills Co. v. Ranlett ..... 191 Lawnsdale, West Portland Home- Missouri River, F. S. & G. R. Co. v. stead Ass’n v .......... . .... . .... 291 United States .................... 66