XIV CASES REPORTED. Page Page Moody, Newman v ........... . ..... 858 Pentlarge v. Kirby Bung Manuf’g Moore v. North River Const. Co .... 803 Co., (three cases,) ....._ . .......... 5 O1 Moore, United States v ............. 39 Pentlarge v. Pentlarge ............. 817 Morgan v. Rogers ...... . ..... . .... `. 596 Perkins v. Dennis. ........... . ..... 145 Mosher v. St. Louis, 1. M. & S. Ry. Phelps v. Canada Cent. R. Co ...... 801 Co. ....... . .,................. .. 849 Philadelphia & R. R. Co. v. Pollock 401 Mowat v. Brown ......... . ......... 87 Pollock, Philadelphia & R. R. Co. v. 401 Muller v. Norton ......... . ......... 719 Pollok v. Louchhcim. ...... . ....... 465 Mulville v. Adams. ................ 887 Ponca, The ...... . ................. 223 Munson v. Hall. ...... . ............ 320 Poole v. Thatcherdeft. ............. 49 Munson v. Mayor, etc., of New York 313 Poth, Kroptf v ..... . ............... 200 Muskegon Nat. Bank .. N. W. Mut. Pride of America, The. ......... . . . 607 L. Ins. Co ................ . ...... 405 Prinz Georg, The .... . ..... . ..... .. 653 P. Smith, The ..................... 551 Nashua & L. R. Corp. v. Boston & Purcell v. Baltimore, C. & R. Steam- L. R. Corp ............. . ..... 804 boat Co ......................... 56 National Car-brake Shoe Co. v. Terre Haute Car, etc., Co .............. 514 Quaker City, The .............. 141 National Tel. Co., \Vestcrn U. Tel. 6 Querini Stamphalia, The. .......... 123 Co. v ............................ 5 1 New Bedford, City of, Shaw Relief Railroad Com. of Tenn., East Tenn., Valve Co. v.. ....... . ............ 753 V. & G. R. Co. v ............ . .... 679 New Hampshire Land Co. v. Tilton. 73 Railroad Com. of Tenn., Louisville New Orleans, City of, Carter V .... . . 659 86 N. R. Co. v ............. . . . . . . . 679 New Orleans, City of, Hall v ....... 870 Ranlett, Mississippi Mills Co. v .... . 191 New O 1·le a ns & N. E. R. Co., Ray v. One Block of Marble ........ 525 Fletcher v ............. . ......... 731 Rayer& Lincoln Seaming-Mach Co. New York & N. E. R. Co., Brassey v. Amer. Pr. Co. ................. 428 v. ................... . ........... 663 Ray11or,Reay v ................ 308 . Newman v. Moody ................. 858 Reay v. Berlin & Jones Envelope Co. 311 Newman, Roemer v ...... , .... . ..... 9 8 Rcay v. Raynor .... . . . . ...... . ..... 308 Nichols v. Jones ................ . .. 855 Red Wing Mills V. Mercantile Mut. Nicodemus v. Frazier .............. 260 Ins. Co ........................ .. 115 Noonan, Bell v .................... 225 Reed v. Holliday ................... 325 North Riv. Const. Co., Moore v. .. . . 803 Rheola, ’[`he ....................... 926 Northern Pao. Ry. Co., Buchanan v. 254 Rheola, The, Coughlin v .... . ...... 926 Northern Pac. Ry. Co., Lung Chung Rich v. Town of Mentz ............ 725 v. ......... . .................. . . 254 Richardson, Kellog v ........ . ..... 70 Northwestern Mut. L. Ins. Co., Mus- Robb, In re ........................ 26 kegon Nat. Bank v ........ . ..... 405 Roberts, Donahue v ............ 863 Norton, Muller v ..... . ............. 719 Rock River Paper Co., Middleton Nott v. Clews ..... . .......... . ..... 145 Paper Co, v ..... . ............... 252 Rockaway, The ........ .. .. ..,,. . . . 449 Odell v. Baltimore, C. & R. Steam- Roemer v. llcndley ....... . ......... 205 boat Co ..... . ....... . ............ 56 Roemer v. Newman .... . ..... . ..... 98 Oelberman v. Merritt .............. 408 Rogers, Morgan v .................. 596 Oluf, The .,................... 459 Rose v. Stephens & Condit Transp. One Block of Marble, Ray v ........ 525 Co ..................... . . . ...... 808 One Wire Rope Cable, Blowers v. .. 444 Rude, Westcott v ............... .. . 830 O’Nci]1, United States v ............ 567 Russell, United States v ............ 591 Ontonagon, The .................. . 800 Russell Sage, The .................. 792 Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co., VVells, Fargo Rust, Texas & St. L. Ry. Co. v ...... 239 & Co. v. ........... . ............. 20 Osseo, The. .... . ....... . ........... 844 Sabula, City of, Chicago, M. & St. P. Otto, Hicks v ...................... 749 Ry. Co. v ................. . .- ..... 177 Oyster. Albright v .... . ............ 849 Sacramento, City of, Kennedy v .... 580 Pacific Mut. L. Ins. Co., Sensendcr— Safety Nitro Powder Co., Giant fer v ......... . . . ................ 68 Powder Co. v ............. . ...... 509 Paton, Dillard v ............... _ .... 619 St. Joseph & VV. R. Co., Benedict v. 173 Pearce, Gold & Stock Tel. Co. v. . . . 419 St. Lawrence, The ................ 328 Peer of the Realm, The ............ 216 St. Louis, H, & K. R. Co. Blair v. . . 861 Pegasus, The .................... .. 46 St. Louis, 1, M. & S. Ry. Co., Mo- Pentlarge v. Kirby, (three cases,] .. . 501 sher v ......................... . . 849