XX CASES REPORTED.
Page i Page
Marina, The ....................... 760 Nicodemus v. Frazier ............ .. 260
` Odell v. Baltimore, C. & R. Steam·
boat Oo .......... . ............... 56
CIRCUIT COURT" E' D' PENNSYLVANIA' Purcell v. Baltimore, C. & R. Steam-
Bradley v. Hartford Steam-boiler I. SCl£?tvC‘ééi b}é·       gk5h}- 56
&lr1s. Co ...... . ................. 246 ‘ ¤ ‘ · '
E1kiuS;Manuf:g&GaSC0"KirkV._ 417 DOSECO.......................·. 56
Green, Matthews v ...... .. . . ..... 649
Hartford. etc., Ins. C0., Bradley v. . 246 Drsrmcw Counw, D. MARYLAND.
Kirk v. Elkins Manuf’g & Gas Co. . . 417 _
Mgtphgwg v_ Gregg_________ ____ ____ _ 649 COIIDQI, Tl1C..........-......-- ..•..  
Philadelphia do H. R. Co. v. Pollock 401
Pollock, Pl.\llB.dGl.pllll¤1 86     CO. V. 401 CIRCUIT COURT E_ D_ NORTH CAROLINA_
Santiago de Cuba, The, v. The Scots ’
GYEYS -··- ·-·· ·-·-····· ·- ····- • 213 Blake v. Hawkins ....... . . . . .... . . . 204
Senlieze de Cube. The, The Seete nrrwirirre, Blake v .................. 204
_ Greys v ................... . ...... 213
°°2’rli"r(§TT’?'?`IT1}`?Y.‘.il1T’.??`T`.tT?"?"f’.?IT° 21a Gmew <>e¤¤=e· W- ¤· New ¤»·¤¤¤¤<»~·
S°8fr.S5‘i¥?z T??:.??? .“‘f‘“??‘?."f’ 212 Jones v- Vew ef Teleltr Pew -- ee
" " ' Trinity Parish, Vestry ol, Jones v.. 59
Drsrnrcr Comer, E. D. PnNNsvLvAN1A. DISTRICT COURT, We D. NORTH CAR0_
Cooke, In re ............ . ...... . . . . 89 MNA'
Jay Cooked; Co. In re ............. 88
seiiy, The ....   .................. sae W°"°>’· Ee p“”‘° ······ · ··········· **86
Omcnrr Conm, W. D. PnN>1svLvANrA. CIRCUIT 00Um* E' D' vm6mm'
, v Alexandria City of, United States v. 609
gwé}; V' bagygr ·‘‘*‘‘'*·•'•··‘•·•‘   Alexandria: City of, United States v. 614
CP, 85 V' El; '‘‘‘   ‘ ‘   "   ‘ ‘ ‘   United States v. City of Alexandria. 609
5;**; °“· °”°“g ° · °*P€ ° 231 United States v. ciiy of Alexandria. 614
Dun,Brer11eyv.I..[.`[Z.[[.j.`.`]]]sis
Holliday, Reed v ..... . ..... . ....... 325 DISTRICT COUMU E- D·VIRGl-NU-
Ll d . M'll . ................... 915
M$ler,vLie§·ac; ..................... me Bekereelveee Ge- v. The Exeeleiee- 436
Reed v. neiiiriey ........... . ....... sz; Exeeleien T1¤e.Beker Selveee Ce v- 436
Sawyer, Berry v ............ . ....... zees Me¤1¤eeee¤.T1¤e -·---·-····-·---·- ·- 430
Tcgpedo Co. v. Borough of Claren-
OD ...... ...... ............ ..... 23]. CIRCUIT CQURT’ D_WE5T VIRGINIA_
DISTRICT 0OURT` W_   PENNSYLVANIA_ KGTAGP, UDlt€d SUITES V. . . e • . . r e e • • •  
United States v. Keller. ............ 633
Joseph W. Gould, The.  .....   785
St. Lawrence, The .... . ............ 328
FIFTH CIRCUIT.
FOURTH CIRCUIT- Cmcurr Comer, N. D. ALABAMA.
Jones, Nichols v ................. .. 855
CIRCUIT COURL D' MARYLAND Moody, Newman v ........... . ..... 858
· · _ i Newman v. Moody ................ . 858
B%1ggH)]:’_?'        56 Nichols v. Jones ....... .. .. ........ 855
Baltimore, (J. & R. Steam-boat Oo.,
Purcell v ......................., 56 Crnonrr Comer, S. D. ALABAMA.
Baltimore, C. & R. Steam-boat C0.,
Scott v .......................... 56 Louisville & N. R. Co., Waring v.. . 863
Frazier, Nicodemus v ...... . ....... 260 Waring v. Louisville & N. R. Co.   863