XIV CASES REPORTED. Page Page Davis Wrought I. W. Co., Davis Im- Hart, Thayer v ............. . ...... 693 proved Wrought Iron W. W. Oo. v. 699 Hayes v. Dayton ................... 690 Edwards v, Conn. Mutt`. L.;I*ng. Cot. 452 Hellman. v. Attrilln ..... . .......... 570 Edwards v. Trav. Liferfnss C ...... 661 Hicks v. Ferdinand. ....... . ...... .. 111 Everest v. Buffalo Lubricating Oil Hilmers, Oregon & Trans. Co. v .... 717 Co ........ . ..................... 848 James, Yale ook Mauuf’g C0. v .... 903 F elthouseny Albany Steam Trap Co. Jeannot, Untermeyer v.· ............ 503 v.. .......... . . . .... . ............ 633 Kirby, Pentlarge v ................. 898 Lull v. Clark ...................... 454 Ladd v. Mills ............ . ......... 792 New York Grape Sugar Co. v. Amer. Land Co. of New Mexico v. Elkins. . 545 Grape Sugar Co ................., 505 Lidgerwood Manuf’g Oo., Mundy v. 114 New York Grape Sugar Co. v. Buf- llndgerwood Manuf’g Co., Mundy v. 191 falo Grape Sugar Co. ............ . 505 Mallory Manufg C0. v. Fox ........ 409 Parker Carriage Goods Co., Oran- Maurer, Fryer v .......... . . ....... 916 ~ dal v ..................... . ...... 851 Mills, Ladd v ..... . ................ 792 Travellers’ Life Ins. Co., Edwards v. 661 Mundy v. Lidgerwood Manuf’g Co. . 114 Vacuum Oil Co. v. Buffalo L. Oil Mundy v. Lidgerwood Manuf’g Co. . 191 Co... ......... . ............ . ..... 850 Muscr, Woosterv ........... . ...... 162 . Worswick Manuf’g Co. v. City of National Wire M. Co. v. New York Builalo .................. . ....... 126 Braided-wire M. C0 .............. 119 Neumann, Simon v .......... . ..... 196 CIRCUIT COURT, S, D_ NEW Y0RK_ NewYork BI‘2t1d(;‘d-Wll`B M. O0., Nat. Wire M. Co. v ..... . ........ . .... 119 Arnold v. Phelps ................... 315 New York B. & B. C0., Pentlarge v. 314 Arnoux, Weston Dynamo-Elec. M. New York Cent. & H. B. R. Co., Co. v ...... ` ...... . ........ z ...... 112 Rintoul v ............ L . .......... 313 Atlantic Milling Co. v. Robinson.. 217 New York Shipping Com’r., In re _ Attrill, Cassard v .......... V ........ 570 Aec’ts of ......... . .............. 211 Attril1,Chism v .................... 570 Newhall, Fetter v .... . ............ 113 Attrill, Fee v .· ..... ‘ ...... . . ., . . 4 . . . 570 Oglesby v. Attrill. ................. 570 Attrill, Gillespie v. ................. 570 Oliver, Fetter v .................... 114 Attrill, Hellman v. ..... . ..... . ..... 570 Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co., Ervin v .... 577 Attrill, Oglesby v .................. 570 Oregon & Trans. C0. v. Hilmers. ... 717 Attrlll, Sears v ......... . ........... I 570 Palmer v; Travers. ....... . ........ . 501 Baker, Smith v .................... 709 Pentlarge v. Kirby ............... .. 898 Baltzer, Bischoisheim v. ........... ` S90 Pentlarge v. New York B. & B. Co. 314 Berlin & Jones Envelope Co., Reay v. 506 Peters v. Robertson ................ 818 Bischoifsheiin v. Baltzer ....... . .... 890 Phelps, Arnold v .................. 315 Bristol, The ....................... 800 Providence o': S. S. Co., Clare v ..... 535 Brush vg Condit ........ . .......... .826 Rcay v. Berlin & Jones Envelope Co. 506 Brush-Swan Elec. Light Co., Consol. Reinhardt, Werner v ....... . . . . .... 163 Elec. Light Co. v ........ . . .’ .... 502 Rlntoul v. New York Cent. & H. R. Cassard v. Attrill .................. 570 R. Co ....... . ................... 313 Chism v. Attrill .................... 570 Robertson, Peters v ...... . ......... 818 Clare v. Providence do S. S. Co ..... 535 Robinson, Atlantic Milling C0. v. . . 217 Coudit, Brush v ................... 826 Roemer v. Simon ............. . . . . . 197 Consol. Elec. Light Co. v. Brush- Roosevelt v.VVestern Elec. C0 ...... 724 Swan Elec. Light C0 ............. 502 Sears v. Attrill ............ . ....... 570 Dayton, Hayes v ..... . ..... . . ...... 690 Shipping Com”r, In re Acc’ts. of .... 211 Delaware, The ................. . . . . 797 Simon v. Neumann ................ 196 Elkins, Land Co. of New Mexico v.. 545 Simon, Roemer v ............ . ..... 197 Ervin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co .... 577 Slmonson, Woosterv ............... 316 Fee v. Attrill ...................... 570 Smith v. Baker .................... 709 Ferdinand, Hicks v ................ 111 Stern, Hall v. . .” ....... ..... 788 Fetter v. Ncwhall ........... . ..... 113 Thayer v. Hart .................... 693 Fetter v. Oliver. . . ............... 114 Thayer, Hart v .... . . . ....... . ..... 696 Fox, Mallory Manuf’g Co. v ..... . . 409 Travers, Palmer v. . . t . .. . . ........ 501 Fryer v. Maurer ....... . ........... . 916 Tully, In rc ....... . ......... .` ..... 812 Gillespie v. Attrill ......... . . .. ..... 570 Uutermeyer v. Jeannot. ............ 503 Gumbirnner, Wooster v ............ 167 Werrier v. Reinhardt .... . . ......... 163 Hadji, The ........ .. .............. 875 Western Elec. Co., Roosevelt v ..... 724 Hall v. Stern ...................... 788 Weston Dynamo-Elec. M. Oo. v. Ar- Hart v. Thayer .................... 696 noux ...... . ..................... 112