XIV CASES RE1>o1:TmD. PHG Page Goodyear’s Rubber Manuf’g (Jo., Withoif, Gronstadt v ............... 253 Goodyear Rubber Co. v .......... 276 WO()StU1' v. Handy ........ . ........ 51 Groustadt v. Withoif ..... . ......... 253 Wooster v. Howe Machine Co ...... 67 Handy, Wooster v ............ . .... 51 Eilii 5: 53E3i23E5E; 1:::; :1::;;:: S2? MM- S-. D- MV VM- Hollender, Lu ties v. ......... . .... 281 · Holmes Elec. Drot. Co. v. Metropoli- g;?? 1H1E2g' '°''°''°’''' tan Burglar Alarm Co. ....... 458 Day Briggs V` ` ' '`’'‘'''''‘ 727 H<>VV<= M¤¤hi¤¤ G0--W<><>¤¤r V — ---·- 67 115..i555y5, r11A11C l ZZ11i1Q` I III ' 111 134 I¤·gg>¢g¤~=¤¤ Stem-¤¤¤¤ ¤¤-»_M=V>‘¤=‘· 593 Francis, rho, Nom v ............. .. 921 Iron-Clad Manuf’g C0., Matthews v, 641 gl;%7éS’·g1l§g’ bwphcuson V `'''` ' ` ' ° Jackson v. United States. .......... 35 H W Hm, `V '`'''' ‘ ''''' 727 Lalance & Grosjean Manuf’g C0., Jémcg A éérhclh @16 '''''`‘''' ` ‘ 474 Milliganv ....................... 570 JOh,mm,'Au uSm’ThG '‘'`‘ ‘ ‘‘‘''`° 134 ¤·=¤1==~¤¤¤¤ BMVV C0- V- W68m Lepanto Thg 1<5£15.-15.&55513° 555 X}' 651 Elec. O0........-...............5 538 LucyD,Th6, ` I, i 142 Luyties v. Hollender ............,.. 281 Lud,,Mé’Hm '''``'' ' '°`''`''’ 431 Marlor v. Texas &2 P. R. Co ...._ . 383 Mayflmba Tim '''''°'° 476 Matthews v. Iron-Clad Manuf’g Co. 641 McDowell Umlgd slams V ’’'' ' ' ' ' 563 Mayor, etc., v. Ind. Steam-boat Co.. 593 Nedcrlandgch ctc V The 651 Mayor, etc.,Philadelphia & Reading Nall1V The Flmnéls ' p ` 921 ‘ Coal & Iron Co. v ................ 97 Ondcwionk V Smml `'''``'''''' " ' 588 Metropolitan Burglar Alarm (Jo., Ra mmm Lula V TH`; ''‘'’' 479 Holmes Elec. Prot. (Jo. v ..... 458 Smbith Oddcrdohk V ' ‘'‘'' 588 Mgllglj1Vl,gVbOL¤1¤¤¤¤ & <*¤>Si¤¤¤ 570 51551..;..55.. V. rho rk55E1A` I QI I IZZZ 715 Mossman, Newbury v .............. 579 $g;g;d»1§Lit8§d;' Q{,‘g{fg,‘{g*1‘ '''‘'`''' Mutual L. Ins. Co. v. Champlin .... 85 V€l0X’ Tm; mg Woglm ''‘'''’'''' 479 Newbury v. Mossmau .......... 579 Vcl0X’ Th; In {6 RaVm;,;d'V '''’'' 479 One Wire Rope Cable and New YOl'k · ·’ ’ _* '`'’'' . , Wilkins, The Velox ads ............ 479 Wire Rope (Jo.,Blowers v ........ 352 Woskc The Vg10X ads 479 People’s Ferry Co., Turner v ...... . 90 ’ ' '''°'''''''' Phéladelphia L4? Reading Coal & I. 97 CIRCUIT COURT D VERMONT 0. v. The a or ................ 1 · · Plock, Teilman vf .................. 349 _ Reed v_ Atlantic & l>_ BH (l0_ _______ 253 Hurd, Volentme v ....... . . . . ...... 749 Robertson, Whitney v .............. 566 bh¤1d<>¤S.Sm¤¤ S¤<>¤¤—0¤¤<¤r 0¤· v- 875 Rogers v_ Bowurman _________ _ _____ 284 Sowles v. United States ............ 223 SC]1ll`II16l‘,ShBI1fl6ld v .............. 241 Mem Stone-Cwer 00- V- Siwldcns 875 Sheniield v. Schirmer .............. 241 U¤¤*€d_b*8t€S5 b°W1€S V ····· · -··-·· 223 Sly? Vgllllmg Cl-amp ,36 Sons Shlp 56 Volentme v. Hurd ................. 749 . l g. 0. v ................. 1 Spill v. Celluloid Manuf’g Co ...... 631 Sugivan Mach. Co., Amer. D. Drill 74 THIRD CIRCUIT o. v ...... . ..................... Teilman y. 11:1 ogk. . .1 ............ BX3S& . . O., 8.YO]`V.··•.... · I G _ _ Tnlotson, Eioomo Gas 1.. 0o.v ..... sas C R U"` C°°"’ D DELAWARE Timayenis v. Union Mut. L. Ins. Co. 223 Delaware M_ &V_ Rh (l0_ Hambly v_ 541 Turner v. People’s Ferry Co ........ 90 Hambly v’_ Delawal-6 M_ :2 v_ R_ O0_ 541 U¤i¤¤ Mut L- 1¤¤· Cv-.Tim¤y¤¤i¤ V- 223 Heroe Tho ......... ' ............... 525 United States v. Colgate. . . .... . .... 318 ' United States, Folsom v. ........... 37 D C D United States, Jackson v. ......... . 35 {STRICT °URT• ‘ DELAWARE W,;¤;;V·;$i-_ ${2-;_{·?$}¢{¤j=jié _??}; ,3, Katie 5511...., The ............ . .... 409 White v. Boyce ...... . . ............ 228 Whitney v. Robertson ............. 566 Cmcurr Cover, D. New Jmnsm!. William Cramp & Sons Ship. & E. Bldg. Co. v. Sloan ....... .. ... .... 561 Bonnell, Havemeyer v. .......... .. 406 Williams, Estes v .... . ............. 189 Crane, Welling v .................. 707