xvi CASES REPORTED.
Page Page
Covington, City of, Covington City Milan, Town of, Kelly v. .... ...... 842 A
Nat. Bank v ........ . ........... 484 Neely, Lafayette Co. v ............. 738
Covington,City of, First Nat.Bank v. 484 Pamplin, Love v ,.... . ...... .. ..... 755
Davis, Ex parte. ....... . ..... . ..... 396 United States v. Anonymous ........ 761
First Nat. Bank v. Cityof Covington. 484 Whittenton Menuf’g (Jo. v. Memphis
Henderson v. Central Pass. Ry. Co. 358 & O. R. P. C0 .... .. .... .......... 896
Louisville City Ry. C0., Central
Pass. Ry. Co. v ............ . ..... 358 l
Cmcmtr Oonivr, E. D. M1cmoAN. SEVENTH CIRCUIT,
Allen v. Wilson .... . ......... . ..... 881
Hancock Inspirmor Co. v. Jenks. . . 911 Cmcmr Coeur, N. D. I1.r.rNors.
Jenks, Hancock lnspirator Co. v .... 911
J, P. Donaldson, The, Slyiield v. ... 671 Adams & W. Manuf’g Co. v. Wilson
J. P. Donaldson, '1`he, Sonsmith v. . 671 P. Co ..... . ............. . ........ 648
Koch, New Process Form. Co. v ..... 580 Bank of Montreal, United States v. . 236
New Process Ferm. Co. v. Koch. . . . 580 Barney v. Chapman ...... . ..... . . . . 903
Slyfield v. The J. P. Donaldson. . . .. 671 Brown Manuf’g Co. v. Buford. ..... 714
Sonsmith v. The J. P. Donaldson. .. 671 Brown Manuf’g Co. v. Deere ..... .. 709
Wi1son,Allen v .................... 881 Buford, Brgwn Manufg Co. v ...... 714
blmpman, arney v ....... . ........ 903
Drsrmcvr Connr, E. D. MromoAN. Coglgiggigt Mme L· Ins- C0- V- 281
New Hampsxnre, The .............. 924 Grgvvferd. C<$¤ee<>ti<=¤¤ Met L.- Ins. 281
I o. v ............ . ..... . .........
Cmcurr Comm, N. D. Omo. §(;°§gg§r¥Qv;;3£?uuf’g C0' v'    
D · _ D 1] _______________A_______ 523 Morden, Weirv .................... 243
n2°Qii,`i>ei§)v. ....................... 523 New Yerk Grepe Seger Ge- v- Pe¤·
Forncrook v. Root .... . ..... . ...... 328 EE Grape Seger Ce -··· · ··--·   · 878
em, Fornerook V .... . ..... . ...... aes Nj;gt<;EhGly;ee1g;s3;¤e· v· Pee- 878
·Dr¤¤·EE¤E Cem. N· D· <>E¤<>- P°€£iL°$g §i},§ZrSE€?$€?1’.1i?i.Y?ik me
Th Peoria Starch Manuf’g C0., New
SG118WOI', G...................... 19]. YOrkGr&pcSug,]·rC0_v_".-"." 878
Robertson, Taylor v ................ 209
Cmcnrr Comvr, S. D. Onro. Eaylor v. Robertson ...... . ......... 209
nited States v. Bank of Montreal. . 236
B. do L). R. Co., Grafton v .......... 309 Weir v. Morden .................... 243
B. & O. R. C0., Zweig v.. .   ....... 309 Wilson P. C0., Adams & W. Manuf’g
Grafton v..B. & O. R. Co .... . . ..... 309 Co. v ..... ·. .......... ` . .` .......... 648
Zweig v. B. & O. R. C0 ............ 309 Wirt v. McEnery .................. 233
Cmevrr UGURT. S· D- OHM. W· D· Drsmnrcm Oourvr, N. D. Innmors.
Active Me¤¤f’g 00.. Peters v ------ 319 Irons v. Manners Nat. Bank ....   197
Franklin Ins. Co. v. Sears .......... 290 Manuprs NM Bank, Irougv ________ lg-;
Kuhl v. Mueller. ................... 510 `
Mueller, Kuhl v .....   .... . ...... 510 A `
geters By. Active Manuf’g Co. ...... 319 CIRCUIT (#0UR'I`· D- INDIANA-
k1‘ I . C .   ...... 9
°m’ me m "S ° V 2 0 nom comes, 1(imballv ...... . .... 145
Cmem <>¤¤ET- W- D- TENNESSEE- i{i’§ii§i’¤ ]$°3}.SiZi°¤X.;Ai¥gI.'.°.°.'.`.ZZZ II ii?
Anonymous, United States VM I l I · ‘ 761 McA1pme v. Hedges ...........  .   689
Kelly v. Town of Milan ...... . ..... 842
Lafayette Co.. v. Neely. ...... . ..... 738 D1s·rnrc·1· Cover, D. INDIANA.
Love v. Pumplin. .· .............   755
Memphis dt 0. R. P. Oo. ,Whittenton United States v. Webster ........... 187
Manuf’g Co. v ................... 896 Webster, United States v ........... 187-