x CASES REPORTED.
· Page Page
Lincoln, Robbins v ...... . .... . .... 842 Netherclift v. Robertson .... . ...... 737
Lindroth v. Litchneld ............ .. 894 New England Mut. Life Ins. Co.,
Lisso, Clailin v. . . . .... . .... . .. .. . . . 420 Inglesv .......... . .... . .......... 249
Litoht1eld,Lindrothv .... .......... 894 New Jersey Steam Transp. Co. v.
Lockwood v. Faber. . .... . . . . ...... 63 The Bay Queen. ..... . . .......... 813
Lord Worden, The, v. The Silica... . 467 New York Belting &:Packing Co. v.
Lord Worden, The, The Silica v... . 467 Magowan .... . . . . ..... . . . . ...... 111
Louisville & N. R. Co., Anthony v. 724 New ork Belting & Packing Co. v.
Low v. Fisher ..... ....... .... ..... 542 Maglowan ...................... .. 362
Lyons, Lacroix v .... ........ .... .. 403 Niles ool—works v. Betts Mach. Co. 301
North Bloomfield Gravel Min. Co.,
Maggie Willett, The,. ... .... . .... 519 In re .... . ....................... 795
Magowan v. Andrews .... . ......... 886 North Bloomneld Gravel Min. Co.,
Magowan, New York Belting & Woodruff v .... . ..... . . . .... . .... 795
Packing Co. v .... . .. ......... . . . . 111
Magowan, New York Belting & Onderdonk v. Smith ......... . ..... 874
Packing Co. v ......... . .......... 862 Oneida, The ....................... 759
, Mahin v. Pfeiifer .... . . . . .... . ..... 892 Oregon, The. . . . ...... . ...... . ..... 751
Manhattan Beach Co. v. Hamed . . . 484 Oregon, The .... . .... . . .... . . . . .... 871
Manitowoc, The.. .... . ..... .   .... 759 Oregon Ry. do Nav. Co., Ervin v.. . 625
Manufacturers N at. Bank, Irons v. 591 Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co., Oregonian
Martha Brower, The ..... . . ....... 513 Ry. Co. v., (four cases,) ...... . . . . 277
Mason v. Ervine .... . ..... . . . . ..... 240 Oregonian Rty. Co. v. Oregon Ry. &
Mason v. Ervine .... . .... . . . .... . .. 459 Nav. Co., ( our cases,) .... . ....... 277
May v. County of Fond du Lac. .... 691 Orr, Montgomery v. .... . . . .. . . . .... 675
May v. Western Assur. Co .... . .... 260 Oshkosh Carriage Co., Calkins v... 296
May, Adams v ............. . . . . .... 907 Ostrander, Schultz v .............. 295
Mayo v. The John S. Smith ....   . 398 Otis Bros. Manuf’g Co. v. Crane
Mayor, The, etc., Edgerton v ...... 230 Bros. Manu? g Co ..... . .......... 550
McArthur v. The San Marcos ...... 567 Owsley v. Pope Manuf' g Co. ....... 100
McArthur, Craig v. .... . ... ........ 911 Owsley, Pope Manuf'g Co. v ....... 100
McGinnis v. Farrelly ............... 33-
McGovern, The Ellen. ............. 868 Pacific R. Co. of Mo. v. Cutting .... 638
McLane v. Leicht ..... . ............ 887 Parker, Dana v .... . ..... . ......... 263
Menacho v. Alexandre .... . . .... . .. 529 Partee v. Thomas .... . . . ..... . .... 429
Menacho v. Ward. .......... . ...... 529 Payne, Alabastine Co., v.. ......... 559
Merriam, Root v ..... . . . ..... . . .... 909 Peddie, Roemer v .... . .... . ........ 702
Merryman, The F. I .... . . . . .... . . . . 813 Pennsylvania Annex No. 3, The,
Meyrose, Steam-gauge & Lantern Hogg v ....... . .............. . . . . 516
Co. v ...... . ............. . . . . .... 213 Penuslyvania Co., United States v. 539
Michigan Pipe Co., Hobbie v. ...... 656 Perkiomen, The .... . ..... . . ....... 573
Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co., Barry v. 1 Perseverance, The ........ . ........ 478
Mothtt v. Cavanagh. . . .. . .... . ..... 511 Peters _v. Heller ............ . . . . .... 474
Montgomery v. Orr .... . . .......... 675 Pfeiffer, Mahin v .... . .......... . .. . 892
Montross v. Bullard .... . .......... 64 Phillips, J osslyn v .... . . . .... . ..... 481
Morgan v. Cox .... . . . . .... . . . . ..... 36 Pitts v. Clay ............ . .......... 635
Morrell, The W. A. . . .... . . . . ..... 570 Plumb, Western Land & Cattle Co.
Morris v. Kempshall Manuf’g Co.. . 748 v. ........................ . . . .. . 598
‘ Morris. United States v .... . . . . .... 341 Pope Mauuf’g Co. v. Owsley .1 . . .. . 100
Morrison, The Edwin I .... . . . . .... 136 Pope Manuf’g Co., Owsley v .... .. . 100 _
Morse, State v .... . . .... . .......... 261 Porter, Waterman v ..... . .... . .. . . . 827
Muller & Ellison .... . ....... . . . .... 456 Power v. Baker .... . ........... . . . . 396
Murray v. The Harlem .... . . . . .... . 236 Pratt Manuf’g Co. v. Astral Benning
Murray, Smith v ................. . . 69 Co ........ . . ..... . ........ . . .... 492
Pray, The E. H ...... . ............. 474
Nashawannuck Manuf’g Co., Shen- Providence Washington Ins. Co. v.
  v .... . ................ . .... 808 The Sydney.; ...... . ............. 119
Nashua do L. R. Co. v. Boston & L. Pulley, hite v .... . ....... . . . . .... 436
R. Co. .... . . . .... . .... . .......... 821 Putnam v. The Young America .... 562
Natchez, The ........ . .... . .... . . . . 309
National Improved Telephone Co., Racine Seeder Co. v. Joliet Wire-
American Bell Telephone Co. v. 663 check Rower Co ................. 367
National Steamship Co. v. The W. Rackett v. Stickney ...... . ..... . . . . 878
A. Morrell ....................... 570 Rand, McNally & Co., Blades v. .... 93
Nellie Bloomileld, The. .. ..... .... . 524 Raven, The .... . ....... .. .......... 470