X11 CASES =Rll$I‘ORTED.A
P¤s¤ ··—4 , wz Page
Sperry v. Insurance Co. of~N. A .   516 Vermont Nat. Bank, Eastern Town-
_ Spill v. Celluloid Manuf’g‘Co ..... ... 94 ships Bank y... ......... .... .... 186
Standard Sugar Refinery, Swan v... 468 Viterbo v. Frledlander.... ......... 422
Starkv. Mueller- ....... . ......... ; 447 e A ·. '
State of Illinois v. .Fl8tCll'BI" ......... 776 Wabash, St. L. &.P. Ry. C0. v. Cen-
State of Maine,·The, (four cases,) . . . 734 tral Trust O0 .......... ., ......... 138
State of Tennessee v. Pullman South- Waliasli, St.. L..& P. Ry. C0., (len-
ern Car Co ............... .. ....... 276 tra] Trust C0. v .......... . ..... . . 138
State of Tennessee .v. Wlii·tworth. . . 75 Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. C0. v. Ceu-
State of Tennessee v. Whitworth. . . S1 tral Trust C0 .................... 269
Statham, Raisin v ..... .. ......... . . 144 Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. C0. v. Cen-
Stitt v. Eastern R. Co .............. 649 t-ral Trust Co .... . . . . .. .......... 272
Stout, Odell v ............. .. .~ .... 159 Wallace v. British American Assur.
Strang v. Schell ...... . ............. 506 Co .............................. 66
Strauss, In re, v. Meyer .... . ....... 467 Wallace v. Thames da Mersey Ins.,
Sue, The. . .. .... , ............ . .... 843 Co., (two cases,) ........ A ......... 66
Superior, The .......... . ...... . . . . 927 Walsh, United States v .... . ....... 644
Sutherland v. Jersey City dr B. R. Co. 356 Walter A. Sherman, The ........... 790
Swan v. Standard Sugar Refinery. . . 463 Wan Yin, In re ............ . ...... . 701
Warner, The J. F.. ............... 342
Tate v. Thomas .................... 660 Washburn do Moen Manuf’g Co. v.
Texas & St. L. Ry., Central Trust C0. Cincinnati Barbed·wire Fence C0. 712
v ..... . .... ’ . ..................... 135 Washburn Sz Moen Manuf’g C0. v.
Thames &: Mersey 'Ins. Co., Wallace H. B. Scutt‘& Co. ..... . ......... , 710
v., (two cases,) ................... 66 Wasserman v. Chica go, B. & Q. R.Co. 872
Thomas P. Way, The .............. 739 Wasserman, Chicago, B. & Q. R.
Thomas Sherlock, The. . ........... 253 Oo. v ............... L . . .. ........ 872
Thomas, Tate v ....... . ..... . ..... . 660 Wel>ster v. Mitchell ...... . . . . . .... . 869
Town of Attica, Chandler v ........ 625 Wehmer, Lozano v .. .' ............. 755
Town of Loraine, C. N. Nelson Lum- Weir Plow Co., Gilbert v .... . ..... 428
ber Co. v ........................ 54 Wessinger v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry.
Town of Monticello, Merrill v. ..... 589 Oo .............................. 569
Town of Phelps, Tracey v .......... 634 W€St€l`H Union Tel. O0. v. Baltimore ,
Tracey v. Town of Phelps. . ._ ......, 634 & Ohio Tel. Co. of Texas ..... . .... 133
Transfer No. 2, The, ..., ............ 555 Western Union Tel. C0., Marine
Tweedy, Ex parte ................. , 84 Grain & Stock Exchange v ....... 23
Whitiiey v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. C0. 569
Union Mut. Life Ins. O0., O’Brien v. 586 Whitworth, State of Tennessee v. . . 75
Union Pac. Ry. .C0., O’Ro1·ke v. .... 189 Whitworth, State of Tennessee v. . 81
· United States v. Barnhart .......... 285 Wilkerson, Flash v. ....... . ..... . .. 689
United States v. Clark .......... .. . . 387 Wilkinson v. Delaware, L. & W. R.
United States v. Clark .............. 708 C0 .............................. 353
United States .v. Frazer ............. 106 Wilson v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. C0.. 3
United States v.. Gordon .......... .. 250 Wilson Sewing·machine Co. v. Wil-
United States v. Gunning .... . ..... 653 son ....   .... . ...............   803
United States v. Hague ............ 706 Wilson, De Gran v ............ . . .   560
United States v. Mason ............’ 707 Wilson, Wilson Sewing-machine
United States v. Payne. ........   426 Co. v ........... . ..... , ........... 803
United States v. Russell. ..,. . ...... 390 Wollensnk v. Rciher ...... . ....... · 651
United States v. Van Vliet ........ .. 641 Wooster- v. Hill ............ rv. . . .... 830
United States v. Walsh . . .... . ..... 644 Wo1·tl1ington, Estes v .......... .. . . 822
· · ‘ Wright, Sandwich Manuf’g Co. v . . 631
Van Vliet, United States v.. ...... 641 Wyman, St. Louis Smelting & Re-
Vermont Cent. R. Co., Brooks v .... 211 nning C0. v. .......   ... ....... .. 184
 '