XIV CASES REPORTED.
Page Page
Fortier v. Five Hundred and Sixty Fox v. Patton ............... .   746
Thousand and Sixty-two Feet of Grapeshot, The ........... . ........ 123
Pine Lumber ,..... . ............. 790 Henry M. Clark, The .... . ......... 752
Hamilton J. Mills, The ......... .. .<. 790 Leonard v. Decker .... . ............ 741
Petition of Ins. Co. of Pennsylvania, Lilian M. Vigus, The ...... . .. ..... 747
ln re ........ . . .................. 109 Markham v. Simpson ..... . . . . ..... 743
Superior,Thc ...... . ......   .... 927 Martino Cilento, The .............. 859
Walter A. Qhernnan, The ........... 790 Marx   Mational Steam-ship C0.   680
ary r cbabc, The ..... . ........... 750
Cmcorr Coorur, S. D. N nw Yom:.   Tné ······ · ·······  
E 2 X., ··•••·..•·•.•••
Adams v_ HOW,,,.d_ __________ _ __ __ 656 Ocean Wave, The. ............ . .   175
American Bcll Telephone Co. v. Peo- Pénnsllvanmv The ···*·•··‘•*·•··• j  
pleas Telvphonc C0'. I". H ·..___ 309 Rtiba. l11C...'. ..·....... .... ....... 046
Badger v_ Mulvmc ______   ____ 257 lim Grande, l`he. ................. . 914
Barry. V, BHS5D,,,.,, K- & Tw. Ry, C0, r 631 l»OS<:(l2l.l0= Fl llB ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 737
BchI.€Ddt,1n,.€_ · __`····   699 H.0Slyll,lll€ .... ...................tJ87
City of New York V. Independent mCl1l1ylGI‘ V. l20Cl{C1‘. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 741
Sm,,m_bO,,, UO, ____ _ _______·_____ 801 nmith v.Mok1l1op ................. 7.57
com.-sev. names .... . ........... me ¤,¤¤*=¤ 07 Ng=¤¤¤· We (fm MGS.) · ·· 734
one V. massa ....... . ............ we 7,¤<>¤¤¤ 1- Wav. FM —··--·-·--·--- 739
Estes v. Belford. ................. .. 275 **¤¤S*’*#P N°· 2· The -·············· 555
Estes v. Worthington .......... .. .. 822
V Fischer v. Hayes ..... . ............. 92 Crnoorr Coorvr, D. Vnnuonr.
Fischer v. Hayes ............... . . . . 529
Frerichs v. Costcr ................. . 637 Brooks v. Vermont Cent. R. Co.... 211
Glen Cove M:tnuf’g Co. v. Ludcling S23 Eastern 'l‘ownsh1ps Bankv. Vermont
Gold & Stock Tel. Co. v. Connnercial Nat. Bank .... . .... . ............. 186
Tel. Oo .... . ..... . ........... .   838 Fargo v. Redfield .......... .. ...... 373
Good Hope Co. v. Railway Barb Melendy v. Currier .... . ..... . ..... 129
Fencing Co. ..... . ....... . ...... , 635 Wooster v. Hill ............ . ....... 830
Grindrod v. Crine. ..... . ..... . ..... 257 »
Hammond v. lFranklin .... . . ....... 233
Hatch v. Hal ...... . .............. 38
Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. THIRD CIRCUIT-
Metropolitan Burglar Alarm Co. . 341
International Tooth Crown Co. v. DISTRICT COURT D DELAWARE
Mills ...................... . ..... 659 ’ ' `
Pickhardt v. Packard .............. 530 George tpwlang, The ____ _ _____   799
Railwaygeg. Mangfg goat. Broad- 655
wa `event. 1 ve. . o. ......
,m,lgay Reg Manuf? O0_ v_ Cem Cmcurr Counr, D. New Jnnsnr.
tml Park. N· Mi- 1<· it- 00 ·----- 655 rrmcks v. Hermes ........... .. .. 424
Rcusfms V- Mexican NM- C‘~mS"“c‘ Norris v. Hassler . ...........   .... 401
111011 Ct?. ..... _ .......... . .` ...... . . 522 Sutherland v_ Jersey City & B_ R_ G0_ 356
Spill v. Qclluloid Manuf’g (io ....... 94 Wilkinson v_ Dc1m,,,,,...,, L_ &, ·W_ Rh
Strang v. bchell ......... . .......... 506 C0 ___________________________ _ 353
Tate v. Thomas ....... > ............. 660 ` °
United btates v. Gunning.   .. ...... 653 DISTRICT COURT, D. NEW JERSEY.
Drswmcr Oourur, S. D. New Yom;.     £licho1§,’¥he ........ . ........  
. . t an on , 10 ......... . ...... ‘
Active, The ....................... 175 Cranston v. A Cargo of Two Hun-
Ah Kee, ln re ..................... 519 dred and Fifty Tons of Coal ..... . 614
Alaska, The. .............. .. ...... 548 Harrison, In re .... .. ............ .. 528
Alvena, The .... ‘ ....... . .......   S61 Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Atha. ..... . 920
Amboy, The. .................-   555 Sallie P. Linderinan, The ....... ... 557
Arctic, The, (nine cases,) ........... 126 Snyder v. A Floating Dry-clock ..... 685
Boskenna Bay, The ................ 662
EF?'-;;;    ···-·········•-··   Cmcnrr Connr, E. D. Pnnnsvnvnzn.
Edwin H. Webster, The ........... . 171 Becker v. Hastings. ........ . ...... 827