CASES REPORTED.
Pago` _ Ptgv
Aalholm v. A Cargo of Iron Ore. . . 620 Boston & Fairhaven Iron Works, In `
Abraham v. Western U. Tel. Co.... 315 re ........... . ............ . ...... 880
Adams v. County of Republic. ..... 211 Bowen, Gillett v ............... ... 625
Addieks v. Three Hundred and Boxes of Opium v. United States... 367
Fifty-four Tons Crude Kainit .... 727 Bresnahan, Richardson v .......... 897
Etna Life Ins. C0., Prudential As- Brewster, Norton v.. ........... . .. 840
sur. Co. v ..... . . .............. 438 Brockway, In re .... . ..... . ....... 583
Ah Ping, In re .................... 329 Brooks, Citizens’ Bank v. .......... 21
Alaska, The. .... . .................. 597 Broughty v. Five Thousand Two
Alberta, The ............. . ......... 807 Hundred and Fifty-six Bundles of
Allen v. O’Donald ................. 573 Staves ........... . ............... 106
Allen, Riley v... ............. . ..... 46 Brown v. Fisk ............... . .... 228
Allen, The Charles ........... . ..... 407 Brownlee, Newby v ....... .. ..... . . 320
Alpin, The, (nine cases,) ........... 815 Bryce, D. M. Osborne & Co. v ...... 171
Amelia, The ....................... 406 Buffalo Lubricating Oil Co., Vac-
Amsterdam, The. ................ .. 112 uum Oil Co. v ...... . ............ 891
Anchoria, The ............ . .....   669 Bugher v. Prescott ...... .. ........ 20
Anderson, In re. . .................. 482 Burlingame v. Central R. of Minn.. 706
Archer, The .... . .... . . ..... . ..... 350
Cameron, Howes v. . ....... .. ...... 324
Baker, Pioneer Gold Mining Co. v. ..258 Canadian Bank of Commerce, Pres-
Baker, In re .... . ........... . ...... 30 ton v ..... .. . ........... . ...... . 179
Baker, The S. B ..... . ............. 109 Canan v. Pound Manuf’g Co ....... 185
Baldwin, McG1·iH v ................. 222 Candee, Woonsocket Rubber Co. v. . 797
Baltimore & O. Tel. Co., Western U. Cargo of Iron Ore, Aalholm v ...... 620
Tel. C0. v ...................... 12 Cargo of Lumber, A, Parquette v. . . 301
Banks v. Manchester ........ . ..... 143 Carl, The ........................ . 727
Bareticld, United States v .......... 136 Carlsdotter v. The E. B. Ward, Jr., 900 _
Barker, Wooster v .... . ............ 49 Caro, The. ...... . .... . ..... . ..... 734
Barry v. United States Mut. Acct- Carroll, Phillips v. ................. 249
dent Ass’u .... . ................ .. 712 Catchings, Mitchell v ..... . ..... . .. 710
Bartlett v. His Imperial Majesty, the Colluloid Manuf’g Co. v. Chrolithion
Sultan ............... . .... . ...... 257 Collar do Cuff Co ................. 397
Batchelder, Steam Stone-cutter Co. Celluloid Manuf’g Co. v. Comstock 38
v ............... . ................ 313 Central R. of Minn., Burlingame v.. 706
Bayaud, United States v .......... . 721 Central Trust Co.v.Ohio Cent. l{.Co. 306
Bayle v. City of New Orleans ...... 843 Central Trust Co. v. Texas & St. L.
Bell Telephone C0., State of Mis- Ry. Co ....... . ................... 673
souri v .... . ........... . ......... 539 Central Trust Co. v. Texas dc St. L.
Bellici v. The Prinz Georg ........ . 906 Ry. Co ........................... 703
Biclaelhoupt, Hayes v .............. 183 Central Trust Co. v. Texas & St. L.
Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K, H. Co... 521 Ry. Co .......................... . 846 '
Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R. Co... 523 Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L.
Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R. Co... 524 & Pao. Ry. Co .... . .............. . 513
Blair v. St. Louis,H. & K, Ry. Co.. 704 Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L.
Blake, Wooster v ...... . ........... 49 & P. Ry. Co. ........... . . . . ...... 675 .
Blakemore v. Heyman. ............ 648 Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L.
Bonebrake, V7indle v.. ............ 165 & P. R. Co ......... . ..... . ....... 858
Boston Electric Co. v. Electric Gas Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L.
Lighting Co ............... ..   838 & P. Ry. Co. ..................... 863
Boston Electric Co. v. New England Central Trust Co., Wabash, St. L. &
Electric Manuf’g Co ............. 838 Pac. Ry. Co. v., (two eases,) ...... 513
v.23-Fen. (vii)