CASES REPORTED. 1X Page Page Godden, The Edith ........... . ..... 43 J. B. Sickles Saddlery C0., Osrner v. 724 Goepel, Premuda v ...... . ......... 410 Jeffries v. Laurie .................. . 786 Gold & Stock Tel. Co. v. Commercial Jenkins v. Gurney ................. 898 Tel. Co .............. ......... 340 Jennings v. Philadelphia du R. R. Goldsmith v. Gilliland ............. 645 Co .............................. 569 Goldsmith v. North German Lloyd. 820 Johnson, Peard v .......... .... .... 507 Gogtlyear v. Hartford Spring Axle Jones, Steam Stone-cutter C0. v... 313 0 .... . ..... . ..... .. ............ 36 Gordon v. St. Paul Harvester Works 147 Kane, United States v.. .... . ....... 748 Grain Drill Mauuf’rs Co. v. Rude. . . 348 Kappes v. Hartung. ... .... .... . ... 187 Green v. Coos Bay Wagon Road Co. 67 Kehler v. New Orleans Ins. C0 ..... 709 G. Reusens, Th_e ........... . ....... 403 Kellogg v. Root ....... . . . .......... 525 Gunning, United States v .......... 668 Kellogg, Gage v ............ . ...... 891 Gurney, Jenkins v ................. 898 Kelly v. Houghton ................. 417 Kelly v. Otis .... . ....... . ...... . . .. 903 Hack v. Chicago & G. S. Ry. Co .... 356 Kendall, Mundy v. ................. 591 Hamblen, Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. 225 Kent's Adm’r, Ex parte. ........... 482 Hamilton v. Walsh ......... . ...... 420 King, United States v ............. . 138 Hammond v. Cleaveland ..... . ..... 1 Kingman, Pattce Plow Co. v ....... 801 Handy, Wooster v ................. 49 Kingston, The ..................... 200 Hanner v. Moulton . ............ . . . 5 Klein, Valley Nat. Bank of St. Louis Hapgood v. Rosenstock ............ 86 v ..................... . ......... . 676 Harrison v. Merritt .....,...... 653 Knowlton. North v ...... . ..... .... 163 Hartford Spring Axle C0., Goodyear Koehler, Ex parte.. ........... . .... 529 v .... e .............. . ............ 36 Hartford Woven-wire Mattress Co. Laird v. City of De Soto .... . . .. .... 780 v. Peerless Wire Mattress Co ..... 587 Lalance & Grosjean Manuf’g C0. v. Hartog v. Memory ....... . ......... 835 United States Stamping Co ....... 800 Hartung, Kappes v ................ 187 Lancaster, Morley Sewing-machine Hassler, Norris v ...... . ........... 581 Co. v. . ..... . ............ . ....... 344 Hayes v. Bickelhoupt .............. 183 Landsherg, United States v ........ . 585 Hendryx, Perkins v, ..... . ......... 418 Laurie, Jeffries v ..... . ..... . ..... 786 Heyman, Blakemore v ............. 648 Leclanehe Battery Co. v. Western Hibdom, State of Tennessee v ...... 795 Electric Co ...... . ..... . . ........ 276 Higgins v. McCrea ...... . .......... 782 Leech v. Dawson ...... . ............ 654 Hill v. City of Memphis ...... . ..... 872 Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. Hamblen 225 Hill, Roberts v ............ .. ...... 311 Lehman v. ltosengarten. .... . ...... 642 Hill, Sharon v ..... . ............... 353 Liberty Bell, The ............ . ..... 843 Hills v. Stockwell & Darragh Furni- Liggett, Glenn v ................... 695 ture Co .............. . ..... . ..... 432 Lockwood, Glenn v ...... . ......... 695 Hills, The ............ . ............ 413 Logwood v. Memphis & C. R. C0. . . 318 His Imperial Majesty, the Sultan of Lucas, Glenn v ..... . .............. 695 the Ottoman Empire, v. Providence Luckenhack, The E ................ 725 Tool Co .......... _ ......... . ..... 572 Lydian Monarch, The ........ . ..... 298 His Imperial Majesty the Sultan, Lyon, Rawson v .... . ..... . . ....... 107 Bartlett v ........ .. ........ . ..... 257 Hofheimer, Market Nat. Bank v .... 13 Mace, McKay v. ....... . ........... 76 Holcomb v. Holcomb ............... 781 Mackin v. United States ....... . .... 334 Holt v. Menendez ............ . ..... 869 Magowan, New York Belting ob Houghton, Kelly v. ......... . ...... 417 Packing Co. v ................... 596 Howe Machine Co., Wotnster v ..... 49 Manchester, Banks v .......... . . . . 143 Howes v. Cameron . .......... . ..... 324 Mnnualore, The ........... . ........ 462 Hunt, Glenn v ............... . . .... 695 Mangalore, The ..... . ...... . ....... 463 Hynes v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Market Nat. Bank v. Hofheimer.... 13 Co .............................. 18 Mary Bradford, The. ....... . ....... 733 Mary R. McKill0p, The. . . . . . . .. . . . 829 Insurance Co., Merrill v ........ . 245 Marye, Parsons v .................. 113 ‘ Irving, \Voolridge v ................ 676 Mathews, United States v .......... 74 1. & V. Florio S. S. Co., Mina v .... 915 Mauritz v. New York, L. E. & W. 765 R. Co ............. . ............. Jack Jewett, The ........ . ......... 927 McAlpine v. Union Pac. Ry. Co. ... 168 Jamaica, Metropolitan S. S. Co. v.. 448 McCarty, Steam Stone-cutter C0. v. 313 Jamaica, The ........ . ............. 448 McCrea, Higgins v .......... . ..... 782