I CASES BEPORTED• Page Page McFarland v. Spencer. ............. 150 North v. Knowlton ........ . .... . . . 163 McGriiI v. Baldwin ................ 222 North, Orton v .................... 163 Mc Kay v. Mace ................... . 76 North German Lloyd, Goldsmith v. . S20 McKinney v. Rosenband. .... . ..... 785 North Hudson C. R. C0., Railway McLean v. Clark .................. 861 Register Manuf’g C0. v ......... . 593 McVey, In re ........... . .......... 878 Northern Pac. Ry. Oo., Wells, Fargo Mealey v. Met.ropolitan L. Ins. C0. . 25 & Co. v ......... . ........ . ...... 469 Means v. Montgomery ........ . ..... 421 Norton v. Brewster. ...... . . ..... .. 840 Mellon v. Smith-Davis l\lanuf’g Co.. 153 Memory, Hartog v ................. 835 O’Donald, Allen v ................. 573 Memphis & C. R. Co., Logwood v.. 318 Ohio Cent. R. Co., Central Trust Co. Menendez, Holt v ................. . 869 of N. Y. v ....................... 306 Merrill v. Insurance Co ............ 245 Olyphant v.St. Louis Ore& Steel Co. 465 Merritt, Harrison v ................ 653 Oregon Construction Co., Conroy v. 71 Merriwether, In re ....... . ..... 704 Oregon Ry. & Nav. C0., Oregonian Metropolitan L. Ins. Co., Mcaley v.. 25 Ry. C0. v. ....................... 232 Metropolitan S. S. Co. v. The Ja- Oregonian Ry. Co. v. Oregon Ry. & ~ maica .,.. . ...................... 448 Nav. Co ...... . ........... . ...... 232 Meyers v. Shurtleif ...... . . ........ 577 Orton v. North ..... . .............. 163 Miller, In re .... . ...... . ..... . ..... 32 Osrner v. J. B. Siekles Saddlery Co. 724 Mina v. I. & V. Florio S. S. Co ..... 915 Oteri v. The New Orleans . ........ 909 Missouri Pac. Ry. Co., Pacific Rail- Otis, Kelly v .......... . ........... 903 road v ....... . ........... . ....... 565 Mitchell v. Catchings ..... . ........ 710 Pacific, The ....................... 154 Montgomery, Means v. ....... . ..... 421 Parriiic Railroad v. MissouriPac. Ry. Montgomery, Small v. . .. ....... . . . 707 Co. ........................... . . 565 Montpelier Carriage Co., Parker v.. 886 Palmer, Travers v ................. 511 Morley Sewing·machine Co. v. Lan- Paquette v. A Cargo of Lumber .... 301 caster .... . ............ . . . . ...... 344 Parker v. Montpelier Carriage Co.. 886 Morris, Stebbins v ........... . ...... 360 Parker v. Stow ................ 252 Morrisania, The ...... . ............. 731 Parsons v. Marye .................. 113 Morrison v. Price .................. 217 Pattee Plow Co. v. Kingman. .. .... 801 Mosher v. St. Louis, 1. M. 8: T. Ry. Patterson Co., Union Tubing C0. v. 79 Co ................ . .......... 326 Pavo1na,The .......... . .......... . 204 Moulton, Hanner v. ......... .. .... 5 Pearcl v. Johnson .... .. ............ 507 Mueller, Willard v ......... . ....... 209 Peerless Wire Mattress C0., Hart- Mundy v. Kendall ........ . ........ 591 ford Woven-wire Mattress C0 v.. 587 Murphy v. Western do A. R. R. ..... 637 Pennland,The .................... . 551 Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Douglas.. 226 Nassau Ferry Co. v. The Ncreus .... 448 Perkins v. Hendryx ..... . .......... 418 Neal, Wilson v ......... . ......... 129 Persian Monarch, The ...... . ..... . 820 Nellie I`la§-Tg, The,. ................ 671 Pliilailclpliiaéz R.R.Co., Jennings v. 569 Nereus, The. . .. ............. . ..... 448 Phillips v. Carroll ................ . 249 Nereus, The, Nassau Ferry C0. v. .. 448 Phtenix Assur. Co., Fitton v. . ..... 3 Neumann, Roemer v ............... 447 Pilla v. German School Ass’n ....... 700 Newby v. Brownlee ................ 320 Pilot Boy, The .................... 103 New Castle N. li. Go. v. Simpson... 214 Pioneer Gold Mining Co. v. Baker., 258 New England Electric Manuf’g Co., Ponce, Staehelberg v ...... . . ...... 430 Boston Electric Co. v ............ 838 Porter, Fisher v. ................... 162 New Jersey Lightcrage Co., Quinn v. 363 Pound Manuf’g Co., Canan v ...... 185 New Orleans Ins. Co., Kehler v .... 709 Premurla v. Goepel ................ 410 New Orleans, The. ........... . ..... 909 Prescott, Bugher v ................ . 20 New Orleans, The, Oteri v. ........ 909 Preston v. Canadian Bank of Com- New York Belting & Packing Oo. murce ............... . .......... . 179 v. Magowan ............ . ..... . . . 596 Preston v. Smith .................. 737 New York Bung & Bushing Co. v. Price, Morrison v .... . ............. 217 ‘ Doelger .................. . ...... 191 Priest, Glenn v ............... . .... 695 New York Bung & Bushing Co. v. Prinz Georg, The .................. 906 Foehrenbach ................ . . . . 195 Prinz Georg, The, Bellici v ......... 906 New York, L. E. & W'. R. C0., Professor Morse, The ............... 803 Mauritz v .......... .. ........... 765 Providence Tool Co., His Imperial Noonan, Glenn v ...... . ..... . ..... 695 Majesty, the Sultan of the Otto· Norris v. Hassler ..... . ........... . 581 man Empire v ............... . . . . 572