X11 CASES REPORTED. `
Page Psp
Union Pac. Ry. Co., McAlpine v... 168 Watson, Dndgeon v..... . .... .... . . 161
Union Tubing Co. v. Patterson C0. . 79 Wells, Fargo at Co. v. Northern Pac.
United States v. Barerield.   ...... 136 Ry. C0. ...... .... ............... 469
United States v. Bayaud.. ..... ... .. 721 Western Electric Co.,Leclanche Bat-
United States v. Gunningz. ... .... .. 668 tery C0. v. ........ . ............. 276
United States v. Kane ...... . ..... . 748 Western U. Tel. Co. v. Baltimore &
United States v. King ...... . ....... 138 O. Tel. Co ........... . ..... . ..... 12
United States v. Landsbcrg ......   585 Western U. Tel. Co., Abraham v... 315
United States v. Mathews .......... 74 Western & A. R. B., Murphy v ..... 637
United States v. Rogers ...... . ..... 658 Wilkinson v. Delaware, L. & W. Ry.
United States v. San Jacinto Tin C0. 279 Co ....... . ......... . .... . ....... 561
United States v. Seaman ..... . ..... . 882 Wilkinson v. Delaware, L. &W. Ry.
UnitedStates v. Shriver. ....... .... 134 Co .....   ....... .............. 562
United States v. Van Vliet .......... 35 Willard v. Mueller ................. 209
United States, Mackin v. .,.. . ...... 334 Willcox tit Gibbs Sewing—machino
United States, Three Thousand Co., Wooster v ..... . ......... . . . . 49
Eight Hundred and Eighty Boxes Willets Manuf’g Co., Tompkinson v. 895
of Opium v.. ....... . ..... . ...... 367 William F. McRae, The .... .. .. .... 557
United States Mut. Accident Ass’n, William Worden, The ........ ...... 88
Barry v .......,................. .712 Williams v. Stolzenbach. ........ ... 39
United States Stamping Co., Lalance Wilson v. Neal ...... . ... . .. . ...... 129
& Grosjean Manuf’g Co v.. ...... 800 Wilson v. Vaughn ......... . ....... 229
Windle v. Bonebrake ........ . ..... 165
Vacuum Oil Co. v. Butfalo Lubricat· Windinuller v. Robertson .......... 652
ing Oil Co. ...................... 891 Winsor Savings Bank, Steam Stone-
Valley Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. cutter Co. v. ...... . ........... . . 313
Klein ........ . .......... . ... ... . 676 Wisconsin, The ...... . .... .. .... .. . 831
Van Vliet, Unit.ed States v. . .. ..... 35 Witteman, De Kuyper v ........... 871
Vaughn, lVilson v ..........   .... 229 Wooldridge v. lrving .... . .......... 676
Von Pliul, Glenn v.. ............. .. 695 Woonsocket Rubber Co. v. Candee. . 797
Wooster v. Barker ..... . . . . ...... . . 49
Wabash, St. L. & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Wooster v. Blake ............... .. . 49
Central Trust Co., (two cases,)- . . 513 Wooster v. Domestic Sewing-ma-
Wabash, St. L. & P. R. Co. v. Cen- ehine Co ..... . ..... ... .....   49
tral Trust Co .................... 738 Wooster v. Handy ...... . .... . . ... . 49
Wal>a.sl1, St. L. 80 P. R. Co. v. Cen- Wooster v. Howe Machine Co . .... . 49
tral Trust Co .......... . .....   858 Wooster v. Schenck ................ 49
Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co. v. Cen- Wooster v. Singer Manuf’g Co. of
tral Trust Co ............   .... 863 N. J,. ........ . ............   49
Wabash, St. L. & Pac. Ry. Co., Cen- Wooster v. Singer Manuf’g Oo. of
tral Trust Co. v ........ . ........ . 513 N. Y ........... .. . ........... .. . 49
Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co., Central Wooster v. Thornton ............... 49
Trust Co. v ........... . .......... 675 Wooster v, Willcox & Gibbs Sewing-
Wabash, St. L. & P. R. Co., Central machine Co ............ . ......... 49
Trust Co. v .... . .....   . ........ 858 Worden, The William . ...... . ..... 88
Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co., Central Worthington, Russell v..   . .. .. . . 248
Trust Co. v ....... . . . . . . ... ...... 863 Wright, Fuller v. .......... . . . .. . . . 833
Walsh, Hamilton v ...... ... . ...... 420
· Ward, Jr., The E. B ....... .... ,,., 900 Young, Steam Stone-cutter Co. v... 313
Waters Pierce Oil Co., In re. ....... 703 Ystalifera iron Co. v. Redneld .... .. 650
Watson v. Cincinnati, I., St. L & C. -
Ry. Co.................... ...... 443 Ziebold, In re.............. ....... 791
in .