X1? CASES REPORTED.
Page Page
Drsrmcr Comer, N. D. New Yomr. Wooster v. Willcox &Gibbs Sewing-
machine Co ...... . ............... 49
Nellie Flagg, The,. ................ 671 Ystulifera iron Oo. v. Redfield ...,.. 650
Thomas Carroll, The .... . ......   912 _
DISTRICT Counr, S. D. N nw Yom:.
Cmcoxr Cover, S. D. New YGHK- Aalhglm v, A Gai-go of Iron Ore... 620
Add` k . Th H d d d
Amelia, The ....................... 406 Figyzogr T0¤;Bgrud§nK§$I,ig_i?_ 727
Archer, The ....--.-.-·----· · ..··· 350 Alaska, The .... , ....... _ ........... 597
Bartlett v. His Imperial Majesty, the Amsterdam, The ..... r ............. 112
Sultan .·---·.----.·.. . -.··· · .-·-. 257 anonoria, The ................ . .... was
Brockway, In re ...........   .... 583 Carl, The .......................... 727
Celluloid Manuf’g Co. v. Chrolithion Charles Allen, The ....... . . . . ...... 407
Collar& Cult Oo ................. 397 Chasca, The ................. . ..... 156
Colgate v. Coinpagnie Francaise du '(Jitv of Alexandria, The ............ S26
Telegraphe de_1’aris a N. Y ....... B2 City of New York, The ............ 616
Dc Kuyper v. W1tteman.. ........· · 871 Edith Godden, The ........... . .... 43
Dudgeon v. Watson .......... , .... 161 Edwin, The ...... . ...... .. ........ 255
Electric Gas-lighting Co. v. Smith & G. Reusens, The ................... 403
Rhodes Electric Co ...... . ....... 195 Jamaica, The ...................... 448
· Foster v. Seymour ................- 65 Metropolitan S. S. Oo. v. The Ja-
Gogd & Stock Tel. Oo. v. Commercial maica ............... . ....... . . . . 448
e1.Co .... . ........   ......... 340 xr Fg (;0_ _Th N   4,45
Hapgood v. Rosenstock ............ 86   Th? ..... Y. . .   .   .... 448
Harrison v. Merritt .... . . ...... . . . . 653 Paquette v. A Cargo of Lumber .... 301
Hayesryi Bickelhoupt ..............   Pavonia, The. . ........ . ...... . . . . 204
1 s ne ..................., . ..... P l d,Th ..................... 551
Holt v Menendez .................. 869 Pggmddla v. Gtzoepel .... . ........... 410
Kappes v. Hartung .... .   ........ 187 Providence Washington Ins. Co. v.
Leclanche Battery C0. v. Western The Sidney ..........   ...... S8
Electric Co ...................... 276 Rawson v. L_von. ........... . ...... 107
McFarland v. Spencer. ............. 150 S. B. Baker, The .............. .   109
McKinney v. Rosenband ........... 785 Sidney, The ..... . ................. S8
New York Bong & Bushing Co. v. Standard, The .· ................... . 207
Doelger .............. . . . . ....... 191 Suliote, The ............. . . . . . . . . . . 919
New York Bong & Bushing Co. v. William Wo1·den, The. ....... . ..... SS
Foehrenbach .................... 195
5E3e2Q52E???}`  533 ¤¤¤¤¤ ¤<>M· D. VERMONT-
§£.$.‘§i.‘i;;·¥£’T‘i‘T‘?;::::::::1;;::: $2% g2;;¤=¤S·1;;¤¤ g- g¤><»1;¤·,, ---- - -·-- 2;
Titan, The .......... . ............. 413 1,* ,2** V; M°"’“tX 1. “i‘_“C§ P ···· 6 ·· · 88,,
Tomkinson v. Willets Manuf’g Co. . 895 Rglgcef { H5? pe 16 Huge °" 31;
Travers v. Palmer ............. ... . 511 Stem; *gt6n€_ciMéi"   HES];
Union Tubing Co. v. Patterson Co. . 79 der ‘ ‘ y 313
United Bmw] v' Bayu7d' '’'' ° '‘‘'°' 721 Steam Stone-cutter Co. v. Duif .... . 313
United States v. Gunning .....   . 668 Stan Sm e cutwr CO V J D S 313
United States v. Landsberg .... . .... 585 S m S n ` C ‘ ‘ N? 5 ’‘‘‘ ,
United States v. Seaman ........... . 882 umm t°°°'°utt°r °‘ v' ° °"tY‘ 315
- _ Steam Stone-cutter Co. v. Sears .... 313
Wmdmuller v. Robeitson .......... 652 , .
. Steam Stone-cutter Co. v. Winsor
Wooster v. Barker ..... . . .......... 49 qu.,] S Bank 313
Wooster v. Blake .... . ............. 49 S; I S50   ‘ ‘   ‘ ‘ 9*   ‘ ‘;1 ‘‘‘' 3,3
Wooster v. Domestic Sewing-mm 9 Cam H°`cu cr °' ° Ou g"'
ohine Co. . . . ..... . . .... . ......... 4
Wooster v. Handy ...... . ..... . .... 49
Wooster v. Howe Machine Co ...... 49
Wooster v. Schenck ................ 49 THIRD CIRCUIT"
Woostcr v. Singer Manuf’g Co. of
N. J. ..... . . . . ............. . ..... 49 Cmoorr Oooivr, D. N mw J mushy.
Wooster v. Singer Mannf‘g C0. of
N.Y ........... . ...... . ......... 49 Jennings v. Philadelphia & R. R.
Wooster v. Thornton ............... 49 Co ............ . .... . ...... . ..... 569