CASES REPORTED. xvii
Page Page
Holt v. McMullen .... . ............ . 812 D1s·rmo·1· Comer. E. D. Mrssoum.
golf. \3gVinfle1d1Bagk. . ......     N l1_ P k Th 463
"t tt _ 1 ____ _ ____ e1eec,e ....   ........... .
m ° 3 °B V ° my Tichner v. The Nellie Peck ........ . 463
CIRCUIT COURT. D- MINNESOTA- Cmcurr Comer, W. D. Mrssoum.
um. T.... eo. V. F....... .... . .... me C<;g¤;vég*PL·gVg¤W¤r*h V- Ohi<=¤g°· 2.,,
Webster v. Bowman  ... .. ..... .... 889 Holla { maid ' O".'   ''’'’’     123
D1s·rme·r Conan, D. MmNnso·r.·.. Cmoorr Coeur, W. D. Mrssormr, W. D,
Fmuk’Th6_U___   ·___· 287 Lewis v. Chittiek .... .. ....   .... 176 _
Kelley, In re .... .. .... . .. ...... .. . . 268 O C D N
mcmr ourvr, . mnaasn.
Cmcurr Comvr, E. D. Mrssoum. Fish V. Nebraska City B¤Fb·Wi1'6
Fefnce C0.   ....   .... . . . . ......  
· . Kau man v. enne y .... . .... . .... ‘
Abw v— CM & 02- MM S C0- 402 u..... s..... V. .......0. 1:..... e... ..5
Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R. Co... 2 W.th H Courtland Wa Ou C0 372
Blair v. st. 1..)..1..11. az K. R. on. .. 222 ' “° "· g ···
Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R. Co... 684
Ceéit113a.l1£I`rust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. 1
. y. 0 ............... . . . . . r
Central Trust C0. v. Wabash, St. L. NINTH CIRCUIT`
& P. Ry. Co .... . ................ 69
Central Trust C0. v. VVabash, St. L. Cmguyy COURT, D, CALIFQRNIA,
& P. Ry. C0.. .... . ............... 693
City of SV Louis V- The Maggie P- · 202 Chow Goo Pooi, In re. .... . ........ 77
Clapp v. N ordmeyer .... . .......... ·71 Fisher v_ Consolidated Amador Mine 201
Filley V. LiL1Q1E11B1d.. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . 282 Ggldmgrk v_ K;·g]jng__ , _ _ __,_ _ ,,,_ _ 349
First N nt. Bank v· Scotland Go .... 3% 1...1.1.. v. stem. Butte. Gold Mm. 00. 337
Grain-drill Manuf’g Oo. v. Reinsted- 198 United Nielzel Co. v. Californialllec- 475
er. .... . .... . .... .. ....   ...... y triel\ors ............... .. ....
Hill V. SCOtlH.I`ld C0.. . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . 395 Q Wg11g? Fargo & G0_ v_ Carr, , _ ,, _ , _ 541
Hubbard V- Th0¤¤PS0¤ ··-· - ··-····· 188 Wells, Fargo & C0. v. Miner .... . . . 533
llqaird v.Il\Ia y`cér of De Soto .... . .... 236 J
aggie ., e ...... . ......... . . . . 2
lllgellen v.lScotE.ndCCo...   .....   395 i DISTRICT COURVL D' CALIFORNIA'
EK? elf'. .   TTI . . .T'?°?‘?'Y’  217 ’ gm gg §¤¤» lg *2 ···· - - -· ··-- - · ·· {jg
Peterson v. Simpkins .... . ......... . 486 ` Hug u“g· H rc ‘‘‘• • ''‘' ‘ '''‘'
Riley v. Hartford Life & Annuity g
Ins. Co ...... . ......... . ........ . 315 ; Gmomtr Comer, D. Oameor:.
Shattuc v. McArthur ...... . . . .... .. 133 l
Shelley v. Purdy ...... . . . .... . ..... 370 . Koehler v. Barin .... . . .... . . ...... 161
Steam Gauge & Lantern C0. v. Mey- l Koehler, Ex parte .... . .. .... . .... .. 73
rose .... . ................... . .... 491 Queen of the Pacific, The .... . .... . 610
Steam Gauge & Lantern Co. v. St. }Seeley v. Reed .... . ................ 361
Louis Ry. Supplies Manuf'g C0., . 491 Thompson v. Phoenix Ins. C0 ...... 296
25 Fan.
T