CASES REPORTED. ix
Page Page
Gelshenen v. Harris .   ...... .   680 Hutchinson v. Everett .... . .... . . . . 531
Geneva, The .... . . . .. . . .... .. . ..... 647 Hutchinson, Everett v .... . . ....... 531
Geneva, The, Poor v. ............. 647
George H. Dentz, The .......... . .. 40 Illinois Cent. R. Co. v .Chicago,B. &
Georgia Home Ins. Co., Falls of N. R. Co. ...... . . . .... . . ........ 477
Neuse Manuf’g C0. v ...... .   1 Impaneling and Instructing Grand
Giles, Bohanan v .... . ............ .. 204 Jury, In re .... . .............   749
Glenn v. Springs. .... .. ........   494 Indianapolis R. M. Co. v. St. Louis,
Goodnow v. Dolliver. . . . .... .. .... 469 F. S. & W. R. Co .... . ........... 140
Goodiich Transp. Co., In re. . . .... . 7l3 International Ry. Imp. Co., Hunter
Gorre lv. Dickson .... . .........   454 v .... . .... . ....................... 299
Gourden, Ma er v .... . ............ 742 Isaksson v. Williams .... .. .... . .. .. 642
Grand Jury, In re Impaneling and Israel, Friedman v .... .. .... . ...... 801
Instructing. ........... . ......... 749
Greenhalgh, St. Paul, M. & M. R. Jenkins v. Hannan ................. 657
Co. v. . . . . . .... . . . . .... . ....... 563 Johnsen, Swift’s Iron & Steel Works
Greenleaf v. Worthington .... . .... 303 v... .... . .....................   828 ,
Griswold v. Hazard .... . . .... . . .... 135 Johnson, De France v .... . . .... . .. 891
Guillermo, The .... . . .... . . . . ...... 921 Johnson, United States v .... . ..... 682
Guillermo, The, Post v .... .. . .... . . 921 Johnston v. Straus ............. . . . . 57
Gwalia’s Cargo, The .... . .. . . . ..... 919 Judd, Hammersch1agManuf’gCo. v. 292
Haight v. Bird .... .. ............... 539 Kellogg, Gage v. .................. 242
Haines v. Peck .... . ....... . ....... 625 Kelly, In re .... . . .................. 852
Hammacher v. Wilson ............. 239 Kendall, Holt v. ................... 622
Hammerschlag Manuf’g Co. v. Judd 292 King v. Neill .... . . . .... .. ......... 721
Hannan, Jenkins v .... . . .... . . . .. . 657 King, The Edna B .... . ............ 158
Hanover Nat. Bank, Brooks v .... . 301 Kirk v. Milwaukee Dust Collector
Harper v. Shoppell .... . . .......... 519 Manuf’g Co ...... . . . . ........ . . . . 501
Harris, Gelshenen v ............ . .. . 680 Kirkbride, Batchelor v. .... . ....... 899
Hartford Machine Screw Co. v. Rey- Knapp v. Benedict. . . . .... . . ..... . . 627
nolds ........ . ................... 528
Hatton v. De Belaunzaran. ..... . . . . 730 Laclede Wire & Fence Co., Cambria
Haynes, United States v ............ 857 Iron Co. v. .... . . .... . ..... . ...... 420
Hazard v. National Exch. Bank .... 94 Lafayette Hominy Mills, Hudnut v.. 636
Hazard, Griswold v.. .... .. ......... 135 Lancaster v. Providence & S. S. S. `
Hearing, United States v.. . . . ...... 744 Co ..... . . ...... . ......... . ....... 233
Heilner, Birdse e v .... .. ...... .... 147 Laughlin, Russell v ..... . .... .. .... 699 `
Heilner, Unitedy States v. .... . ...... 80 Lauro v. The Mary Fraser. ..... · .... 8 72
Helena, The, v. The Lord O’Neil. . . 463 Law v. Baker .... . .......... . ...... 164
Helena, The, The Lord O’Neil v .... 463 Law v. Botsford ........ . .. .... . . . . 651
Hellyer-,Rossv .... . ...... .. ....   413 Lehigh Valley Coal Co v. City of
Hendee v. Connecticut & P.R. R. Co. 677 Chicago. . . . .... . .... . .......... . 415
Henry Sutton, The ...... . .... . ..... 923 Lepper, Perrin v ............... . .. . 545 -
Hibbs, Ex parte .... . . . .... . . .... . . . 421 Libbey v. Mt. Washington Glass Co. 757
Hicks v. The Alabama. ............ 866 Loomer, Rheubottom v .... . . ...... 698
Hill, Sharon v ........... . ......... 337 Lord O’Neil, The, v. The Helena... 463
Hill, Sharon v ........... . . ..... . .. . 722 Lord O’Neil, The, The Helena v .... 463
Hilton v. Otoe Co. Nat. Bank .... . . 202 Lotus No. 2, The .... . .............. 637
Hinds, Bogart v. .... . . ..... ._ ...... 149 Lotus No. 2, The. Walker v. . . .. . . . 637
Hintermeister, Williams v .... .. .... 889 Luokenback, In re The ............. 870
Hoboken Land 80 Imp. Co. v. The Lyddy v. Gano ......... .... .... . . .. 177
Pavonia ..... . ................... 106
Holt v. Kendall. . . .... . ........... 622 Macheca v. United States.. . .... . .. 845
Hook v, The Venture. . . . .... . . .... 285 l Mandel v. Spalding. ..... . ....... . . 609
Hopkins, United States v... . . . ..... 443 Manhattan Fire Ins. Co., True v .... 83
Howard v. Denver & R. G. Ry. Co.. 837 l Manhattan Ry. Co., Aron v .... . . . . 314
Hoyt v. Slocum .... . . ...... . ....... 329 Manson v. New York, N. H. do H. R.
Hudnut v. Lafayette Hominy Mills. 636 Co ...... . .......... .. ............ 923
Hughes v. Dun ee Mortg. & T. Inv. Marchand v. Emken ............... 629
Co ........ . . .................... 831 Marcussen v. The Mary Fraser ..... 872
Hughes v. Dundee Mortg. do T. Inv. Mary Fraser, The .... . ......... . .. . 872
C0., (two cases,) ....... . .... . ..... 837 t Mary Fraser, The, Lauro v ...... . . . 872
Hunt, In re .... . ..... . . ............ 739 Mary Fraser, The, Marcussen v .... 872
Hunter v. International Ry. Imp. Co. 299 Mary Lord, The .... . . .... . ..... . .. . 862