X CASES REPORTED.
Page ‘ Page
Mary Lord, The, Carson v ......... 862 Norton Door—cheok do Spring O0. v.
Massachusetts Ben. Ass’n, Carrigan 230 E1liottPneumatic Door-check Co,. 820
v. .... . . . .... . . . .............. . . . ·
Mater, Patterson v .... . .... . ....... 31 Ogborn, Tucker v. ........ . ........ 272
Maxwell Land Grant C0., United Ohio Steel Barb Fence Co. v. Wash-
States v ...... . . . ............ . .... 118 burn & Moen Manuf'; C0 .... . . . . 702
Mayer v. Gourden .... . . . . ...... . . . 742 Oliver, Thurber v .......... . .. . . .. . 224
McClean, In re Estate of ....... . . . . 49 Oregon & C.   Co., Bybee v.. .... 586
McGee v. The Agnes Barton. ...... 542 O’Rourke v. entral City Soap Co. 576
McGuire v. Winslow ......... . ..... 304 Otoe Co. Nat. Bank, Hilton v ...... 202
McRoberts, Steam-gauge & Lantern
Co. v .......... . . . . .............. 765 Patterson v. Mater .... . ..... .. ..... 31
Means v. Rees ........ .. ......... . . 210 Patterson, United States v ......... 509
Mehrhoff v. Mehrhoff .... . . .... . . . . 18 Pavonia, The .......... . . .... . ..... 106
Miller, United States v .... . ....... . 95 Pavonia, The, Hoboken Land &
Mills, Yoder v .... . ..... . ........ . . 273 Imp. Co. v .... . .................. 106
Milwaukee Dust Collector Manuf’ g Peake v. Baltimore & O. R. C0. .... 495 _
Co..Kirkv. ....   .... .. ....   501 Peck, Haines v .... .. ....   ....   625
Minnie,Tho ............ . ....... ....· 860 Pennsylvania R. Co. v. The Ply-
Minnie, The, Gedney v ..... . ....... 860 mouth Rock .......... . .......... 40
Minor, United States v ........... . . 672 Pe(pper, Frankfort Whisky Process
Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Union ‘o. v .... . ..... . ................. 336
Trust C0. of N. Y .... . . . . .... . . . . 485 Perrin v. Lepper .... . ....... .. .... 545
Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co., Union Phelps v. Elliott .... . .............. 881
Trust Co. of N. Y. v .... . ........ 485 Phelps, St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. 569
Mitchell, United States v .... . .... . . 607 Phillips v. Risser .............. . . . . 308
M. J. Murphy Furnishing Goods Co., Phipps v. Yost .... . ............... 447
Sprague-Brimmer Manuf’g Co. v. 572 Phoenix Caster Co. v. Spiegel .... .. . 272
Modoc,The ................ . ..... . . 718 Piper v. Shedd .... . ........ . . . . .... 151
Montgomery, Nickerson v. ........ 655 Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co., United
Morris v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Statesv .... .   ........ . . . . .... . . 113
Co., (three cases,) .... . ........... 22 Plymouth, The .... . ....... . . . .... . 879
Morris, Wheeler v .... . ............ 918 Plymouth, The, Neal v .... . .... . . . . 879
Mt.Washin`g;on Glass C0., Libbey v. 757 Plymouth Rock, The .... .. ........ 40
Mullen v. ine ............. . ...... 206 Plymouth Rock, The, Pennsylvania
R. Co. v ........ . ..... . .......... 40
National Bureau of Engraving & Pollock v. Brainerd .... . . . . .... . . . . 732
Manuf’§C0. v. The New Orleans 44 Poor v. The Geneva .... . . . . .... . . . . 647
National xch. Bank, Hazard v .... 94 Porter, Buckingham v .... . ........ 759
Neal v. The Plymouth ........... .. 879 Post v. T. C. Richards Hardware
Neill, King v .......... . ...... . ..... 721 Co. ...... . ........... . ; .......... 618
Neumann, Roemer v .... . . ......... 102 Post v. The Guillermo .... . . ....... 921
Neumann, Roemer v. .... . ..... . . . . 332 Preston v. Smith .... . .... . ........ 884
. New Castle N. Ry. Co. v. Simpson. 133 Procter v. Spaldin .......... . ..... 610
New Orleans, The ...... . .......... 44 Providence & S.   S. Co., Lancas·
New Orleans, The, National Bureau ter v .... . . . . .... . ........ . . . . .... 233
of Engraving8c Manuf’g Co. v.. 44
New York, N. . & H. R. Co., Man- Rahn v. Singer Manuf’g Co. .... . . . 912
son v.... .................. . ..... 923 Railway Register Manuf’g Co. v.
Nickerson v. Montgomery ......... 655 Broa way & Seventh Ave. R. Co. 522
Ninety-live Thousand Feet of Lum- Railway Register Manuf' Co. v.
ber, VVall v ...... . . . . ...... . . . . . 716 Central Park, N. & E. R.gR. Co. . . 522
Northern Pae.R. Co. v. St. Paul, M. Railway Register Manuf’g Co. v.
& M. Ry. Co. ._ .... . ............... 551 North Hudson Co. R. Co. .... . . . . 411
Northern Pac. R. Co., Babcock v.. 756 Rathbone, Adams & W. Manuf’g
Nor.h Hudson Co. R. Co., Railway Co. v... . .... . ...... .. .......... 262
Register Mauufg Co. v ........ . . 411 Raymond, The C. P. .... . . . . ...... 281
North-side Bridge Co., Evans v .... 718 Rees, Means v .... . . . . .... .. ....... 210
Northwestern Horse-nail Co., Bens· Reynolds, Hartford Machine Screw
leyv.... .... . ........... . .... ....250 Co.v ......   ........ .. .... ....528
Norton v. City of Concord. . ....... 679 Rheubottom v. Loomer .... . . .... . . 698
Norton v. City of Dover ..... . . . .. . 679 Richardson, Alabastine Co. v. .... .. 620
Norton v. City of Manchester .... .. 679 Richelieu & O. Nav. Co. v. Boston
Norton v. City of Nashua .... . . .... 679 Marine Ins. Co. .. .... . ........... 596
Norton v. City of Portsmouth .... . 679 Risser, Phillips v .... . ....   ...... 308