xvi CASES REPORTED.
Pap up
V SEVENTH CIRCUIT. EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Cmcurr Coeur, N. D. Innrnors. O1TR<>`¤1'1‘ CGURT. D- COLORADO.
Adams & W. Manuf’g C0. v. Exce1· §[(nH;ndvY`V9ft;v°r &   G' By' C°"  
sior Oil-stove Manuf’g C0. ...... . 270 Patterson v_ Mate}" ' '°`''` ' ''`' " 31
A'?:)':; & W- M¤¤¤f’e C°· V- Rau-l' 262 Spéarry v. Springfield.E.dt    
B·g¤¤1¤y 9-.N¤r¤hv¤¤t¤r¤ H¤r¤<=-Mil 250 ryn°.;'§.Z'1vinnnéLt&5n rbié inL.I`o£>YI.'.Z 2g;
o .... . ....... . ........... .. .... ·
chicatto e P. R- ¤·>. v- Third NM- EEE2S Séitiii ?.“"i‘£.l§e.en‘ ma °°3
Ban of Chicago .... . .. ... .... .. . 820 Grant Co_ _ _ 118
Drummond v. Venable . . . . . ........ 243. '''''' ' ` ''''''`' ' '`'`
Everett v. Hutchinson. ............ 531
Eitnsncitn vt etnauang .............   0¤¤¤¤¤T COURT. N. D- MWA.
otv. ena   .... ...... ...... , t,
Hutchinson v. mmm .... . ........ am M¤;¤¤ v- Chicago. M- & St. P. R.
llllnnoit %ent_ R_ Co_ mghiengoj B_ & 477 C0., (three cases,) .......... . ..... 22
. . o ....   ....   .... ..
Lehigh Valley Coal C0. v. City of Cmourr Comm; N. D. Iows, C. D.
Chicago .............. . ........... 415
Mandel v. Spalding ...... . ......... 609 Goodnow v. Dolliver ........   469
Ohio Steel Barb Fence,Co. v. Wash-
1i;§.`§£”v?°‘s%?i‘ZiTP[?’T‘}i€ YT; 11 II I I I   ¤¤=<=¤¤ COM- N D- I<>v·~~ E- D-
t . ' ....... . . ...... . -.
S{é;;:¤t§;gugg&& Trlgntern Co. v. Mc- 765 B%2t€1 v‘ Ch1°”g°* M‘ & bt P· RY 50
o erts ....   ................. Rb. ·······* nai ‘‘‘· •· ········ ·’··219
Tobey Furniture Co. v. Colby ...... 100 ° mmm v' . al °y ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘·‘* · · ' ' ··•·
United States Mortgage C0_V_ Sperry 727 Trescott v. City of Waterloo ....   592
Van de Venter v. hicago City Ry.
C0 .... . . ........   .............. 32 Cmcurr Conrvr, B. D. Iowa.
Wilson v. Cubley. . . ........... . . . 156
Wolii v. Spalding ...... . ........... 609 Clarkhuff v.Wiseousin, I. & N.R.Co. 465
D1s*rmc·r Comvr, N. D. ILLINOIS. CIRCUIT COURT- S D· I°W‘· C· D·
R s . H ll .......... . ......... 413
Iltilsiwly. Baklejtr .... .. .... .. .... .. ....   Os V 0 yer
1 ips v. isser .... . .........   ,
Vessel Owners; Towing C0.,In re. . 169 Gmc2u` Com. D· KANSAT
Vessel Owners Towing CO" In m' ‘ 172 Atchison Savings Bank v. Templar, 580
Inicliaéiagotn   Lg. Co. v. St. Louis, 140
com- . . . . o ..... . ..........
Om COUMI D` INDIANA` Mehrhoif v. Mehrhoff .... . . ..... t . . 13
Citizens’ Nm. Bank v. wm ....... 294 M¥§§§§§b?‘0€‘NT‘t¥" °°· "· U“‘°“ ,,85
Hudnut v. Lafayette Hominy Mills. 636 State V Btlttdlen ` ' ` ' `''` ` ' ' ' '''` 289
P¤¤=¤i¤ <>‘¤¤¤<=¤ 00- v- Swim ----   272 sm v.`w..nns.`.'.‘.ZI Z11I ZZ I I IZ I I Z1 we
Tucker V. O§})0I‘1t1... . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . 272 Templar v_ Atchison Savings Bank 580
Wheeler v. 0rr1s .... ... .... . ..... 918 Union. rlgng rIQoRot·CN_ _ v_ Mts_ 4g_
som-1, . . y. o ....   . s
Cmcurr Comvr, E. D. Wisconsin.
Drsrmcr Courvr, D. Kansas.
Gelshenen v. Harris .... . ..... . .. .. 880 .
Kirk v_ Milwaukee Dust Collector `Umted States V. Cosgrove, ...... .. 908
Manuf'g Co .... . . .... . .... . . . .... 501
Cmourr Coum, D. Mnmnson.
DISTRICT C°UM`* E' D‘WIS°°N°m‘ Babcock v. Northern Pac. R. Co. ,. 756
De France v. Johnson .... . ........ 891
Goodrich Trausp. Co., In re .... . . . . 713 Kelly, In re .... . . ...... . . . . ........ 852