CASES REPORTED.
Page Pago
Active, The ..................... . 175 Bennett v. Covington . ... ....... .. 816
Adams v. Howard ........ . . . . .... 656 Bermes, Frericks v ............ . . . . 424
Adams Exp. Co., Baltimore & O. R. Berry, Rosewasser v.. . .... . ..... . .. 841
C0. v ............. . ........ . ..... 32 Bird, Maish v ..................... 180
Adams Exp. Co., Baltimore & O. R. Bird, Maish v ..................... 576
Co. v ........ . ......... . ......... 404 Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R. Co... 36
Adams, Hatch v. .................. 434 Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R. Co.. . 471
Adler, Mack v ....... . ............. 570 Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. Ry. Co.. 769
A. F. Nichols, The ................. 623 Bohlen, Fife v .................... 878
Alabama, ’l`he ..................... 449 Boston Marine Ins. Co. v. Red River
Alaska, The. .... . ............. . . . . 548 & Coast Line .............. . ..... 347
Albright v. Oyster ......... . ....... 628 Boskenna Bay, The ................ 662
Allegro v. Lelier ......... . ......... 559 Boston & Savannah Steam-ship C0.
Allen v. Downs . ............. . .... 805 v. Brown .................. . ..... 460
Allen v. Picrpont ................. 582 Boston do Savannah Steam—sl1ip Co.,
Allen, Baltimore & O. R. Co. v ..... 376 Brown v ........ . ............... 460
Allen, Downs v., (two cases,). .... . . 805 Boston & Savannah Steam-ship C0.,
Alvena, The. ................. . .... 861 Faucett v ........ . .............. 460
Ah Kee, In re ..................... 519 Boyce v. Bank of Commerce. ...... 53
Amboy, The. ..... . .......... . .... 555 Bradstreet Co., Angerhoefer v ..... 305
American BcllTelephone Co. v. Peo- Bradstreet Co., Locke v ............ 771
ple’s Telephone Co .............. 309 Brewer v. Jacobs .... .. ............ 217
American Emigrant Co. v. Call ..... 765 British American Assur. Co., Wal-
Amy v. City of Watertown ..... . . . . 418 lace v. . . ........ . ............... 66 .
Angerhoefer v. Bradstreet Co ...... 305 Broadway & Seventh Ave. R. 'Co.,
Anne E. Valentine, The ............ 620 Railway Reg. Manuf’g Co. v; .... 655
Arctic, The, (nine cases,) ........... 126 Brooks v. Vermont Cent. R. Co .... 211
Atha, Pennsylvania R. Co. v. ...... 920 Brown v. Boston & Savannah Steam-
Avon, The ........................ 905 ship Co . . ..... . ..... . . .......... 460
A Brown, Boston & Savannah Steam-
Badger v. Mulville ...... . ......... 257 ship Co. v. ........ . ............. 460
Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Adams Exp. Brown, McFarland v ............... 787
Co .............................. 32 Buffalo Lubricating Oil Co., Ever-
Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Adams Exp. est v ...... . ..... . ....... . ....... 252
Co ............... . . . ...... . ..... 404 Burger v. Grand Rapids & I. R. C0. 561
Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Allen ..... 376 Burke v. Globe Ins. C0 ........... . 200
Baltimore & Ohio Tel. Co. of Texas, _
Western Union Tel. C0. v ........ 133 Call, American Emigrant C0. v ..... 765
Bank of Commerce, Boyce v .... . . .. 53 Canary No. 2, The. .... _ ............ 532
Barney, Spaeth v ............ . ..... 828 Canary No. 2, The. ................ 536
Barnhart, United States v .......... 285 Capital City Bank v. Hodgin. ...... 209
Barrett v. Oregon Ry. &Nav. Co.. 452 Cargo of Two Hundred and Fifty
Barry v. Crane Bros. Manuf’g Co. . . 396 Tons of Coal, Cranston v ...... . . . 614
Barry v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.. 631 C. B. Sanford, The ................ 863
Bate, East Tennessee, V. & G. R. Celluloid Manuf’g Co., Spill v. ..... 94
Co. v ......... . ...... . ........... 480 Central Park, N. & E. R. R. Co.,
Bate, Louisville & N. R. Co. v ...... 480 Railway Reg. Manuf’g C0. v.. .... 655
Beaver Falls Cutlery Co., Rubel v.. 282 Central Trust Co. v. Texas & St. L.
Becker v. Hastings .............. .. 827 Ry .... . ................ . .....   . 135
Behrendt, ln re ................ . . . 699 Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L.
Belford, Estes v .......... . ........ 275 & P. Ry. C0. .................... 138
v.22—·F1;1>. (vii)