CASES REPORTED. 1X page Page Galesburg Water C0., City of Gales- Illinois, M. & T. R. C0., Beals v .... 721 g burgv ........................... 321 Industry, The .... . ............. ... 767 mines v. City of New Orleans ..... 411 Ingles v. New England Mut. Life Gaither v. Kansas City, etc., R. C0. 544 ns. Co .... . . . . ........ . .. . . . .... 249 ` Garden City, The .... . ..... . ...... . 234 Ireland, Theurkauf v. .......... . . . . 769 Ghiselin, Dodd v .... . . .... . ....... 405 Iron-clad Manufg Co., Hoif v ...... 307 Gilmer, Winn v .... . ....... . ....... 817 Irons v. Manufacturers Nat. Bank. 591 Giulio, The .... . . .................. 318 Irthington, The .... . ............... 143 Glenn v. Scott .... . . . .. . ...... . .... 577 Israel, Schuler v .......... .. . ...... 851 Glenn v. Walker .......... . . . .. .. 577 Globe Nail Co. v. Superior Nail Co. 450 James T. Easton, The .... . ......... 464 Globe Nail Co., v. Superior Nail Co. 454 Jarvis v. The Tonawanda .... . .... . 575 Gould, Woodward v .... . .... . ..... 182 Jeifries v. Laurie ...... . ........... 195 Gould, Woodward v .... . ..... . .... 338 Jeffries v. Laurie. .... . . . .... . .... .. 198 Gove, The Wesley A. ............... 311 J encks v. Langdon Mills. .... . ..... 622 . Graves, Corbin v .... . . . . .... . ..... 644 J. J. Driscoll, he ............ . .... 521 Great Western Despatch Co., St. Johann, Eells v .... . ......... . ..... 327 Paul Roller-mill Cov .... . ....... 434 John Hancock Mut Life Ins. C0., Griggs v. County of St. Croix.. . ... 333 Calfery v .... . . .... . ........... . . 25 Gumerscll, Danzig v ....... . . . ..... 185 John N. Parker, The, and The Frisia 480 Guthrie v. Harker .... . ............. 586 John N. Parker, The, Kitchin v .... 480 John S. Smith, The. ............... 398 Halliday v. Covel .... . . .... . . .... . . 217 Johnson v.Wilcox & Gibbs S. M. Co. 689 Hammann v. The Industry ......... 767 Johnston, St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Hammett, Clark v. ...... . .......... 339 Co. v. .............. . .... . ....... 243 Hancock v. Holbrook. ..... . .... 401 Joliet Wire-check Rower C0., Ra- Hancock Inspirator Co. v. Lall .... 88 cine Seeder Co. v. ...... . .... . .... 367 Hanford, Union Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. 588 Jones v. United States. ..... . . ..... 447 Hardt v. Liberty Hill Consolidated Josslyn v. Phillips .... . ........ . .. . 481 Mining &Water C0 .... . .... . .... 788 Harker, Guthrie v .................. 586 Kahler, Hoe v .............. _. ...... 145 Harlem, The ............ . .......... 236 Kansas City, etc., R. Co., Gaither v. 544 Harned, Manhattan Beach Co. v .... 484 Kearney v. Lehigh Val. R. C0 .... . . 699 Hatch v. Wallamet Iron Bridge C0. 673 Keith, Wetherell v ...... . ...... . . . . 364 Headley, Roemer v ..... . .... . . . .... 702 Kelly v. United States ...... . ...... 616 Heilner, Birdseye v ..... . .. .... . . . . 289 Kelly, United States v .... . .. ._ ..... 542 Heller, Peters v. .... . .... . ......... 474 Kempshall Manuf’ g Co., M0rr1s v. . 748 » Hendee, Connecticut & P. R. R. Kessinger v. I·Iinkhouse.. ... ....... 883 Co. v ............................ 678 Kessinger v. Leibracht ............ . 894 Henry Bill Pub. Co. v. Smythe ..... 914 Kessinger v. Vannatta ........ . .... 890 Hickox v. Elliott .... . ............. 830 Kie v. United States. . . ...... . .... 351 Higgins, In re .... . ................ 443 King Iron Bridge & Manuf’g Co. v. Hill v. Biddle .... . .............. .. 560 Count of Otoe .... . .... . .... . .... 800 ` Hill v. Smith .... . . . ...... . ........ 560 Kinler, Lafauci v .... . ...... i. .... . . 442 Hinkhouse, Kessinger v. ......... .. 883 Kirby v. Thames & M. Ins. Co ..... 221 Hobbie v. Michigan Pipe Co ....... ~ 656 Kitchin v. The John N. Parker.. . . . 480 Hobbie v. Smith .... . . ......... . . . . 656 Knap, Hoe v ...... . . . . .... .. . . .... 204 Hoe v. Kahler ................. . . . . 145 Hoe v.Knap .... . .................. 204 Laclede Bank, Schuler v.. . . ....... 424 Hoehl, Wing v .... ... .... . . .... . . . . 894 Lacroix v. Iliyons .... . . . .. . ........ 403 Hoff v. Iron—clad Manut"g Co ....... 307 Lafauci v. inler ...... . .......... . 442 Hgqgg v. The Pennsylvania Annex V Lally, Hancock Inspirator Co. v .... 88 o. 3 .... . ..... . ..... . ..... . ..... 516 Lancy, Holloway v ...... . ......... 877 Holbrook, Hancock v .............. 401 Langdon Mills, J encks v .... . ...... 622 Holladay Case, The.. . . .... . ....... 830 Lapham, Brown v. .......... .... .. 77 , Holloway v. Lancy .... . . .... . .... V . 877 Laurie, Jeffries v. . ... . ............ 195 Holt v. The Oregon .... . ........... 751 Laurie, J eifries v ............ . . .... 198 Horne v. Hoyle .... . . .... . .. . . .... 216 Leatherberry, United States v ...... 606 Hosford v. Hotchkiss .... . . .... . 285 Lehigh Val. R. Co., Kearney v..... 699 Hotchkiss, Hosford v .............. 285 Lehmann, Young v .... . . . . .... . .. . 383 Hough v. Buchanan ........... . . . . 328 Leibracht, Kessinger v. . . ....... .. 894 Houston & T. C. Ry. Co., Southern Leicht, McLane v.. . . . .... . . . ...... 887 Dev. Co. v. ............ . ..... . . . . 344 Leslie. Estes v .............. _. . . .... 22 Hoyle, Horne v. .... . ; ........... . . 216 Liberty Hill Consolidated Mining 6u Hubbard, Donoughe v. ........... . . 742 Water Co., Hardt v ...... ,. ..... . . 788