CASES REPORTED.
ARRANGED UNDER THEIR RESPEOTIVE CIRCUITS
AND DISTRIOTS.
Pago Page
TIRCT CIRCUIT- %"‘¥l.’i T? SEER v;.11.;,>m.m.i.;:v IR
rm . ron e
Gray Iron Co .... . . . . .... . ....... 457
CIRCUIT COIIRT. D- MAINE- Morris v. Kcmpshall Mauuf’g Co... 748
Kel] `  U .t d St t 616 Sclmcidcrv. Foote. .... . .. .... .... 581
Y · III C II CC ······ · ······ $$G1lI£1i§{ v. Cockcroft, (two cases,)  
inc o v. Coney ....... . .........
Cmcurr Cormr, D. LIASSACHUSETTB. 4
C.? V. Evans .... 6 ..... 6.. . 5 . .. am DISTRICT <><>¤¤;¤» D- <>¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤T-
Cc uloid M8HUf,g 0. v. han er.. 9 . .
Cxgsslcy v  Connecticut Fire hm   Burdctt v. Williams. .... . . ....... . . 118
0 .... . . .... . . .... . . . ........ . . . . 3
Dana. v. Parker ............ . . . . .... 263 Cmcurr Comvur, E. D. Nmw Yom:.
Davis v. Davis .... . ............ . .. . 490
Iuflesg. New England Mut. Life   Hosford v. Hotchkiss. ..... .... .... 285
ns. o .... . ....... . ..... . . ......
Nghgg CC L· R· CO' v‘ BOSICII CT L; 821 Cmcurr Coum, N. D. Nmw Yom:.
Uuitcd States V. C115E1C . . . .. .. . . .. .   Alabastinc CO  v  Paymth                  
Chase v. Tuttle .... . . . . .... . . . . .... 110
D1sT1uc’r Coumi, D. LIASSACIIUSETTB. Hobbic v. giliczhigun Pipe Co ....... 656
_ Hobbic v. .`miIh...... .... . ....   656
ADDIG   Stubbs, ThE. . . . . . . . . . . .. . 573   Stgamrgaugg 55 Ilantgyu C()_ v_ Fg].
CO1UH1b1&, T11!}. . . .. ... . ... a. .. . . .. •  I [gm; Lantern & ]\;[gnuf’g O0__ _ _ U.  
H0110W3.}’ V. VLPLHCY . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .   Troy Lgnndyy Ligghjucry G0_ v_
Msggiv Willett. TM --··- · ---- - · -· 519 Bimncll .... . ......... . ........... 810
Martha Brower, The .............. 513
' I'
i1€.E};‘.§’%’.§‘.;.TT‘f ·.·.·.  1; ;t: 1;; 1 :3:; Zi? ¤¤w¤¤- Gom S D- Mw Ym-
E?.‘£;‘§.€,;?’.§2T’.I·C‘.T1*T‘i;;:::;;;:;;.;1 33%- »-¤~¤¤¤¤¤¤S ¤¤- v· Sch ercr - ·---·-··- 18
Twin M The .,.,7 Armcuguud v. Coudort. .... . ....... 247
Wash?   GO;,;   `''' ' ' ''''''''   Aahmnic Milling Co. v. Rowland .... 24
y ' ’ `''' ` ``'''````' Qgarrwv. Missouri. K. & T. Hy. O0.,  £
  1 . { dB ld .... . . .... . .....
CIRCUIT COURT, D- NEW HAMPSIIIRE-   5.vDe R/Vix .... . ............. 721-3
. ‘ Bir soya v. Hcilncr .... . . ...... . . . . 289 ',
Jcncks v. Langdon Mills ........... 622 Eogmm v  Flacmcal Supply C0       732 _
rowu v. icplimn .... . .... . . . ...... 7
Cclluloid l\g~muf’g C0. v. American    
` Z louito 0 .... . .... . ............ -5
SECOND CIRCUIT' Cclliiloid M&l1Uf,g C0. v. Zylouitc
Brusli & Comb C0 .... .. .... . ..... 291
CIRCUIT COURT, D. CONNECTICUT_ CIIHIIHIDS V. ,RObBX`1”»SOD..· • · ¤. . • .. • • •  
Day, II1I'8.;. ...... ......... ........ 678
Cclluloid Manuf’g C0. v. Comstock Emery v. Cava¤a§h ..... . . . .. . . .. . 511
& Cggucy 00.. . ... .............. . 858 Ervin v. Oregon y. do Nav. C0 .... 625
v. ·—FED...b xm -