CASES REPORTED. k » ‘= Page P¤!¤ Fortune v. Smith;. .... ........ .. ., . 858 Harris v. City of Shreveport ..... L. . 209 owler, Newbury v. . ...... . ....... 454 Hart, Grain-drill Manuf rs C0. 1.1. . 36*7 Foy, Glenn v ,..... . .... . ...... 907 Hartranft, Myer v .....,.. , .... 358 Freidenberg v. Paris & D. R. C0. .. 169 Haskins v. Thekichmond. . . ..n’. . . 332 Frey, Hyde v ...... . ..... . . . .... . . . 819 Hatch v. The Newport .... . ... .. .. .658 Frisbie, United States v .... ... . . .. . 808 Haynes, Baldwin v .... . .. . . ..‘.... . 99 Frisia, The .... . ..... . .......... ... 249 Hazard, Griswold v .... . .... ....... 578 Frost v. Chase. . . .. .. .. ... ..... .... 102 Hazard, Griswold v. .. .. .. . . .. .... . 597 Fryv. The Krona .... .............. 318 Hedden, Iselin v ........ . .... ...... 416 Heinrich and Tonio, The .... . ..... 469 Gail v. Wackerbarth . . . . ..... . .. . . . 286 Heinrich and Tonio, The, Wilson v. 469 Galileo, The ....,. . . . . . . . ...... . . . 469 Helen Brown, The .... . . ....... . . . . 111 Galileo, The, liicdemann v.. . ...... . 469 Hendrickson v. Wright .... . . . .. . . . 242 Gallagher v City of St. Paul....... 305 Henning v. Planters’ Ins. Co ..... .. 440 Gandy v. Main elting Co .... ..... 570 Henry v. Sowles. ..... . ............ 481 Gandy v. Main Belting C0 ......... 573 Henry v. Sowles. . . .. . . .. . . .. . ..... 521 Gaston, United States v. . . .. . . . .... 848 Hercules, The .... . .... .. ........ . . 475 Gaylord, Tuttle v .... . ......... . . . . 97 Herendeen v. Morgan .......... . . . . 623 Gillette, Bate Refrigcrating Co. v. . 673 Herold v. City of Shreveport .... . .. 209 Gilson, American Diamond Rock Hervey v. Illinois Midland Ry. Co.. 169 Boring Co. v .... . . .... . . . . ....... 217 Hewlett v. Western Union Tcl. C0. 181 Glenn v. Dausman ...... . .......... 907 Hickox v. Elliott .... . . . .. . .. .... .. 117 Glenn v. Dorsheimcr. ...... . . . .... . 907 Hieksv. City of Shreveport ........ 209 Glenn v. Foy ...... . ..... . ....... . . 907 Hill. Rowell v .... . . . . .... ....... .. 433 Glenn v. Hunt.. . .... . . . .... . ...... 907 Historian, The .......... . . .... . .... 336 Glenn v. Liguet .... . ..... . ......... 907 Historian, The, Bares v .... .. . .... . 336 Glenn v. ltlvllier .... . . . . .... . ...... 907 1·lolladay;Case, The .... . .. . ...... . . 117 Glenn v. Noonan .... .. .. .... . ..... 907 Holley, uford v.., ........... .... 680 Glenn v. Priest (two eases). . . . ..... 907 Holmes v. City of Shreveport ...... 209 Glenn v. Scott ..... . .... . ..... .. . .. 804 Home Ins. Co., De Armand v ...... 603 Glenn v. Taussig. ........ . ......... 907 Hooper, The Belle ................. 928 Globe Panorama Co., Morrison v... 817 Hop Bitters Manuf’g C0. v. War· Gomila, Rio Grande Ry. Co. v .... . . 337 ner .... . . .... . . .......... . . ...... 577 Gordon, Lantz v .... .. ... ...... . . . . 264 Horan v. City of Shreveport. .. .... 209 Gould, Woodward v .... . .......... 736 Horne v. Hoyle ........... . .... .... 743 Goulden, Woonsocket Inst. for Sav- Horry, Kidd v .... . . . . .... . . . . ..... 773 ings v .... . . . . .... . . . ............ 900 Howard,Wheeler& Wilson Manuf’g Gragard v. City of Shreveport. ..... 209 l Co. v .... . . . .......... . . . .... . . . . 741 Graham v. Hannibal & St. J. R. Co. 744 I Hoyle, Horne v........ .... . .. . .... 743 Grain·Drill l`IEl.H|1f’1'S C0. v. Hart... 367 Hubel v. Dick ..... . .... . .......... 132 Gray v. Halkyard .... . . . . .... . ..... 854 Hubei v. Dick . . .... . . .... . . .. . .... 656 Green v. Brooks. . . .. . ........ . .... 215 Hubel v. Tucker .... . . .... . ........ 132 Greene, Symonds v. . . .. ...... . .... 834 Hughes v. Dundee Mortgage &. Trust Grinnell v. Johnson ........ . . . . .... 2 Investment Co .... . . . .. . . ....... 40 Grinnell v. The John A. Morgan. . . 895 Hughes v. Dundee Mortgage &Trust Griswold v. Hazard ...... . ...... .. . 578 Investment Co. (three cases)., .... 47 Griswold v. Hazard .... . . . . .... . . . . 597 Hughitt v. Johnson .... . . . . .... . . . . 865 Guimarais’ Appeal .... ... ......... . 528 Hunt, Glenn v ..........,.......... 907 Gutwillig v. Zuberbier............. 721 Hténter v. International Ry. Imp. 842 o. ...... . . . .. . . . ................ Hackett v. City of Shreveport. . .... 209 3 Hurd v. Moiles . .. .. . . . ...... . ..... 897 Haggin, Norris v ...... . ...... ..... 275 ; Hyde v. Frey .... . .. ..... ........ .. 819 Haines, Field v .... ... ...... ....... 919 Hyde, Krippendorf v .... . ..... .... 788 Halkyard, Gray v .... . .... .. .. . . .. . 854 Halliday, Allen v ................ . . 261 Illinois Midland Ryé Co., Hervey v. 169 Halse r, The .... . .................. 255 l Illinois Midland y. Co., Kansas Ham 7\Ianuf’g C0., Steam-gauge & Rollingmill Co. v. .... . .. . .. .... 169 Lantern Co. v ...... .. ...... .. .. . 618 Illinois Midland Ry. Co., Secor v.. . 169 Hammersch1agManuf’g Co.v.Judd. 621 International Ry. Imp. Co., Hun- Hannibal & St. J. R. Co., Graham v. 744 ter v. .... . . . . .... . ............... 842 Hanover Ins. Co., Connor v. .. ..... 549 Irwin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co .... 833 Hanson, United States v........... 74 i Irwin, San Francisco Sav. Union v. 708 Hanson, Ex parte ...... ............ 127?Iselin v. Hedden ...... ............. 416 Hargett, Newark Mach. C0. v. ..... 567 Islands, The ...... . ......... ....... 478 Harper v. Shoppe]]........ ......... 613 Islands, The Lonergan v........... 478