xii nuns nmrom-nn. Page Page Shelley v. County of Bt. Charles . . . 875 Union Trust Co. of N. Y. v. Psrlsr&‘ Shoppell, Harper v. ...... . . . . ...... 613 T. H. R. Co ................ . .. .z . 169 Silver v. Tobin.. .- ....... . ......... ’. 545 United States v. Bebout. ........... 522 Slaymaker, The Ella J ....... L ..... 767 UnitedStates v. Board of Auditors Smith, Fortune v. ....... L ...... . . . . 853 of the·Town of Ottawa ...........‘ 407 Snap, The,. .... . . .... . . . . .... . ..... 527 United States v.·Clinton Nat. Bank. 357 Snap, The, Cokeley v .... . ......... 527 United States v. Craig .... . . .... . . . . 795 South Eastern Ry. Co., Fargo v .... 906 United States v. Eddy .... . ......... 226 Soutter, Charlotte; Duchesse d’Auxy United States v. Frisbie.. . ....... 808 » ‘ v ............... . . . .... . ......... 733 United States v. Gaston ............ 848 Sowles, Henry v .... . .............. 481 United States v. Hanson ........... 74 · Sowles, Henry v .... . . ........ . .... 521 United States v. Kelley’s Adm’rs. .. 845 Sowles, Witters v .... . . . . .... . . .... 121 United States v. Martin ...... . . . .. . 812 Sowles, Witters v. . . ; ...... . . . .. . . 218 United States v. McNelly. .... . ..... 609 Spaulding. Church v .... . . . . .... . .. 101 United States v. Morgan .... . ..... 48 Spill v. Celluloid Manuf’g C0 .... .. 870 United States v. Reed .... . ......... 482 Squaires, Newbury v .... . .... . . .... 752 United States v. Rennecke ......... 847 Stang v. Redden ................... 11 United States v. Richardson .... . . . . 61 Steam-gauge ·& Lantern Co. v. Ham United States v. Rogers .... . ....... 607 Manuf’g Co. .......... . .......... 618 United States v. Sanborn .... . ...... 299 Steamgauge & Lantern Co. v. Myers United States v. Thurber ...... . . . . 56 Manuf’g Co. .... . ....... . ........ 624 United States v. Township of Os- Stevens, Busell Trimmer Co. v ..... 575 wego .... . . . . ................ . .... 55 Stewart, Tondeur v .... . . .... . . .... 561 United States v. Truck’s Adm’x .... 846 Stolzenbach, Keller v .... . . . , ...... 81 ‘ Stone, Loudv ...................... 749 Vader, New England Mortgage Se- Strack v. Aldrich. ......... . . ...... 489 curity Co. v. .... . ................ 265 Stubbs, The Abbie C .... Q; ......... 719 Valensm v. Valensin ............... 599 Sumner, The Alanson ..... . ...... . . 670 Vasey v. City of Baltimore ......... 377 Supervisors of Election, In re. ..... 840 Vega v. The City of Alexandria .... 202 Sutherland Falls Marble C0., Amer- Venner v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. 581 ican Diamond Rock Boring C0. v. 217 Vesta, The Eugene ...... . . .... . . . . 763 Svaboda v. Cheney. .... . . .... . . .... 500 Vetterlein, In re ......,.......... . . 419 Symonds v. Greene .... . .... . ..... L 834 Virden v. The Belle Hooper . .... . . 928 Syskonen, The, v. Logan. .... . . .... 335 * ` Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co., Cen- Taussig; Glenn v .............. . . .. . 907 tral Trust Co. v .... . . .... . ....... 871 Teal v. Fissel .... . ............... . . 351 Wackerbarth, Gail v ...... . . . . ..... 286 Th0masP. Way, The. . . ;. . .... . .. . 526 Walker vt Quincy M. do P. Ry. Co.. 734 Thomas P. Way, The, Renton v .... 526 Warner, Hop Bitters Manuf’g Co. v. 577 . Thomes, Willard v ..... 4 .... . ...... 750 Warner, Richardson v .............. 343 Thompson v. Dixon ................ 5 Washburn, The ................ . . . . 378 · Thorp, Richardville v ...... . .... .. . 52 Wasserman v. Louisville &N. R. Co. 802 Thurber, United States v .... . .... . . 56 Wau-pe—man-qua v. Aldrich .... . . . . 489 Tilden, Maynard v .... . ........ . . . . 688 Welsh, Del Valle v. ........ . . . . .... 342 Tobin, Silver v; .... . .. . . .... . . . .... 545 Western Electric Manuf’g C0., Col- Tondeur v. Stewart ................ 561 gate v. .... . . .... . ................ 146 Township of Oswego, United States Western Electric Co., La Rue v .... 85 v.. ............ . .... . ........... 55 Western Union Tel. Co., Hewlett v. 181 Township of Spring Valley, Bissell Wharton, Cohansey Glass Manuf’g v ................................ 54 C0. v ............................ 189 Troy, The . .' ..... . . . ..... . ......... 861 Wheeler do Wilson Manuf’ g Co. v. Troy Laundry Machinery C0.,D01ph Howard .... . . . ..... . ............ 741 v .......... . .’ ................. . 558 Whitney, Price v .... . .. . ..... . .... 297 Truck’s Adm'}:. United_States v .... 846 Wigton v. Brainerd ................ 29 Tucker, "Hubel v ......... , ........ . . 132 Wildenhus, In re .... . . . . .... . ..... 924 Tuttle v. Gaylord. . . ............. . 97 Willard v. Cooper .... . ........ . .... 750 Tuttle v; Loomis ................... 97 Willard v. Thomas. . ; . . .... . . . . .... 750 Tuttle v. Matthews .............. . . 98 Williams v. Morrison .... . ......... 872 · Wilson v. The Heinrich and Tonio. 469 Union Edgesetter Co. v. Keith .... 715 Wilson, Allen v .... . . .............. 677 Union Ins. Co., Romaine v .... . .... 625 Wilson, Clark v .... . . .......... . . . . 95 Union Pac. R C0. v. Meier ........ 9 Winston, Burgess v ..... . ......... 559 Union Trust C70. of N. Y. v. Paris & Wittemore v. alcomson. ......... 606 D. R. Co. .... . . .... . . .... . . . . .... 169 Witters v. Sowles. .. .. . ............ 218