xiv CASES REPORTED. Page Page Burrv. Kimbark. . . ..... . . .. .. . . .. . 428 Conner v. Pioneer Fire·Proof Const. Burton, In re ...... .... .... . ....... 637 Co ....... . . ................ . ..... 629 Butler v. Bainbridge. ..... .... ..... 142 Connolly, Narragansett S. S. Co. v. 867 , Conover v. The ohn S. Darcy., .... 644 Cahill v. The Willie .... ...... ...... 153 Consolidated Bunging Apparatus Cahn v. Monroe .... .......... 675 Co. v. Woerle .................... 449 Cahn, Winegar v .... . .......... .... 676 Consumers’ Gas, Fuel & Light Co., Cain v. Church ...... . . . . ........... 328 Reyburn v ................... . . . . 561 California & Oregon Land Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. v. The Colum- Munz ............. . .... .... ....837 bia .... . ..... .... .. ....... ....716 Can-ah·conqua, In re .... . .. . . . .... 687 Cooke v. Navarro ...... . . . . ........ 346 Cargo of Lumber, Bradleyv ...... .. 648 Cooper v. Leather Manuf’rs’ Nat. Carr, Hrebrik v. .... . . ...... . ....... 298 Bank ......... . .... . ..... . . . . .... 161 Cartarsso v. The Burgundia. . . . .... 464 Cotzhausen v. Kerting ............. 821 Cedar Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. Council Blutls Sav. Bank, Lyon v. . 566 Coburn .... . ..................... 584 County of Buchanan, May v ....... 469 Cedar Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. County of Jeiferson, Ba timore & ' Coburn .... . ..................... 586 Ohio R. Co. v ...... ... . .... . ..... 305 Cedar Valley Land & Cattle Co., Coupe, Boyer v. . .... . ....... .. .... 358 Coburn v .... . ................... 584 Crocker v. Cutter Tower Co ........ 456 Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. Cross v. Union Metallic Fastening & P. Co .... . ....... . ......... 546 Co ..................,............ 293 Central rust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. Cunard S. S. Co. v. The Republic.. 98 & P. Ry. Co ...... . .... . . ......... 618 Cunard Steam-Ship Co., Felty v .... . 382 Cephalonia, The .... . ........ . .. .. . 332 Cunard Steam—Ship Co., Green v... . 882 Cephalonia, The, Easeman v .... .. . 332 Curran v. St. Louis Refrigerator & Cephalonia, The, Foote v .... . . .... 332 Wooden Gutter Co ........ . ...... 820 Cephalonia, The, Sparks v ......... 332 Cutter Tower Co., Crocker v....... 456 Chadwicke, The .... . . .... . ......... 521 Chadwicke, etc., The, Bolckow, Daisy. The ......... . ... . .. .. ... .... 800 Vaughan & Co. v .... . ...... . .... 521 Darcy, The John S............. .... 644 Chapman v. The Swiftsure.. ....... 462 Davis, Branch v.. .... ... . . ......... 888 . Chase, Reed v .... . . .... . ........ .. . 915 Dent, Ferguson v .... ..... ..... . .... 1 Chase, United States v. ............ 616 Dentz, The ........ . ..... . ..... . . . . 525 Cheney v. Stone ...... . ......... . .. . 885 Dentz, The, & The Plymouth Rock, ‘ Chesapeake, O. & S. W. R. Co., Pennsylvania R. Co. v .... . .... . . 525 Peniield v .... . . .... . ............. 494 Devereaux v. City of Brownsville. . 742 Chicago, I. & N. P. R. Co. v. Dieckerhoif v. Robertson .... . ..... 781 Minnesota &N. W. R. Co. ...... .. 337 Dillon, Hone v. ......... ........ .... 465 Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., Dimmock v. Doolittle ...... ._.. ..... 545 Hospesv .............. . .......... 763 Dolan, Jennings v.. . . .... . . . ...... 861 Chicago & N. W.Ry. C0., Ewell v. . 57 Doolittle, Dirnmock v ...... . . . .... . 545 Child, Ex parte. . .... . ............. 783 Drake v. The Wm. N. Beach.. ....`. 303 Chisholm v. The J. L. Pendergast . 127 Dr. J. P. Witbeck, The. .... . ....... 336 Church, Cain v ............ . . ...... 328 Dudgeon v. Watson ..... ..... ..... 248 Citizens’ Nat. Bank, Wyman v ..... 734 City of Brownsville, Devereaux v. . 742 Easeman v. The Cephalonia ........ 832 City of Denver, Bill v .......... . . 344 Eastern Paper—Bag Co. v. Standard City of Springfield, The .... . ....... 923 Paper—Bag Co .................... 787 ‘ ·City of Springfield, The, Luther v.. 923 East Tennessee, V. & G. R. R.,Hath- Cloud, The .......... . . . . .... . . .... 272 away v.. .... . . .... . .... . . . . ...... 489 Cloud, The, Bergxantz v ...... . ..... 272 Edgar Baxter, The. .... . ........... 538 Coburn v. Cedar alley Land & Cat- Electric Gas—Lighting Co. v. Boston g tle Co ....... L .................... 584 Electric Co .... . . . .... . ....... . . . . 455 Coburn, Cedar Valley Land & Cattle El gin Nat. Watch Co. v. Meyer. .... 225 Co. v .... . . ...................... 584 Elliott, Phelps v .... .. ........ . .... 53 Coburn, Cedar Valley Land & Cattle Estes v. Leslie .... . ......... . ...... 91 Co. v .... . ..... . . ........ . .... .. . 586 Ewell v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. C0. . 57 » Colorado Midland Ry. Co. v. Jones. 193 Columbia, The. ........... . ........ 716 Farwell Transp. Co., Baptist v ..... 180 Columbia, The, Brown v ........... 716 Feltly v. Cunard Steam-Ship Co ..... 332 Columbia, The, Continental Ins. Feo v.` The Salomoni ...... . ....... 584 _ Co. v ............................ 716 Ferguson v. Dent .... .............. 1 Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co., Ferris v. The St. John. .... ........ 221 Brockway v... . . .... .. .. .. . . .. . . . 766 First Nat. Bank, Hood v .... . . . .. .. 55