xviii CASES REPORTED. Page V Page Stebbins v. The Hattie M. Spraker. 457 United Btatesv. Chase.... ...... . .. 616 . stevens v. The G. Barber.. . . . .... . . 269 United States v. Hackett ..... . .. . . . 848 Steward, In re. .· . . .. ; Q ..,. Q. .... .... 813 United States v. Haynes ..... ... . .. . 691 Stiles v. Rice. .... . ,_.... ........ ... 445 United States v. Hilbury ..... .. .... 705 Stone, The Joseph A.. . . ;.. .... .... 650 United-States v.nJackson ...... .. .. . 508 Stone,‘Cheney v.. ...... . .... ....... 885 United States v. Laescki. ...... . .... 699 Storck v. The North Star.. ........ . 151 United States v. McBosley.. .... . . . . 897 Stout, United States v ..... .. ... .... 897 United States v. McMillan. ......... 247 Straus v. The Burgundia... . . .. .... . 607 United States v. Minor ..... ... ..... 134 “ Strickler v. Yager .... » .... . .. . , . .... 214 United States v. Moore. ...... . ..... 897 Su reme Lodge of Knights of United States v. Nelson .... . ....... 202 Honor. Hawkshaw v .... .. . . .._. . . 770 United States v. One Hundred and Supreme Lodge Knights of Honor, Ninety-Six Mares .... . . .... .. .... 139 Marck v. .... . . . . .... . . . .... . . . . 896 United States v. Patterson.. ........ 775 Suéareme Lodge Knights of Honor, United States v. Pierce (two cases). . 897 emm v. .... . .............. . . .... 895 United States v. Ritter ............. 897 _ Swift v. Jenks... .. .. .. .. .. .. .... . . . 642 United States v·. Stout (two cases). . 897 Swiftsure, The .... . . . . .... .. ...... . 462 United States v. Thompson. . . .. .. . 86 Swiftsure, The, Chapman v. . . .. . . . 462 United States v. Thompson . ....... 89 Sylvan Grove, The .......... ....... 836 United States v. Thompson . .... ... 706 Sylvan Grove, The, Wall v.. . . .. .. . 886 United States v. Wightman . . . .. . . . 686 United States v. Wi son·. .. ......... 286 Tanner v. Village of Alliance ...... 196 United States v. Wootten .... .. . 702 Taxing Dist. of rownsville, Loague v ........ .... . .... ... .... 742 Valentine, Meehanv ....... ........ 276 Thos. F. Luby and The Margarctta, Vehslage, Lipsmeier v.. .... . ....... 175 Gregory v. ...... ......... .... .... 824 Venetian, The ......... ........... 460 Thompson v. Hall.; ...... I .... . . .. . 823 Village of Alliance, Tanner v. .... . . 196 Thompson v. McRe§·nolds. . . .. . . .. . 657 Thompson, United tates v. .... . . . . 86 Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co., At- Thompson, United States v... ... . . . 89 kins v ..... . . ...... . . ............ 161 Thompson, United States v .... . .... 706 .Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.,Beers v. 161 Tiers, Parker v .... . ....... . ....... 800 Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. C0., Cen- Tilton, New Hamlpshire Land Co. v. 764 tral 'I‘rust Cot v. ................ ; 546 Toledo, C. & S. y. Co., American Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co., Cen- , Loan & Trust Co. v. . . . .... . . .... 416 tral Trust C0. v .......... . ....... 618 Tonawanda, The. .... . . . .......... . 877 Wade v. Wortsman .... ........ .... 754 Tonawanda, The, J arvis v.. .... . .. . 877 Walker v. Tribune Co ...... . ..... 827 Tribune Co., Walker v ............. 827 Walkie, Jackson v ....... . . ........ 15 Trustees of New York & Brooklyn Wall v. The Sylvan Grove .. .. . .... 886 Bridge, Allison v .... . .. . . .... . . . 517 Wanderer, The .... . .... .. .. . . . .... 260 Tuck v. Olds .... ................... 738 Warner, TheHenry... .... .. ....... 601 Tuck v. Olds .................. . .... 888 Waterbury Buckle Co., Bruff v. .... 214 Tucker, McKay v .... . . . .... . . . .... 295 Waterman v. Mackenzie ........ . . . 816 Two Hundre *Tons of Sulphur, Water Witch’s Cargo, The.... .... . 159 _ The Karo v .... . ; ..... V .... . ....... 652 Watson, Dudgeou v .... . . .......... 248 Two1nbly,Pullman’s Pa1aceCar Co.v. 658 _Webster, Blackwell v .... .. .... . .. . 614 ‘Wells v.·Ar-mstrong. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . 216 Umattilla, The ............ . . ..... .. 252 Welpton, Wood v .... . .. . ..... . ... . 405 Umattilla, The, O'Brien v. . . .. . .... 252 Westcott, Newman v.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . 49 Union Metallic Fastening Co., Cross ' Wheeler, Hyman v ................. 847 v. .. ....................... J . . . 293 Whiting, Holden v. .... . . .... . ..... 881 Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Leavenworth, Whitney,Julius Winkelmeyer Brew- &S. Ry.Co.;·.., .............. 728 ing Co.v .......... ........... 780 Union Pac.- Ry. Co., Leavenworth, ` Wier, '1‘he,v. The Padre. ......... .. 835 N.&S.Ryé O0.v.;.. .... 728 Wigginsv. Bethune ......... ....... 51 I Union Pac. y. O0., Patten v....... 590 Wightman, United States v........ 686 Union Paper-Bag Machine Co. v. ' William Marshall, The .... ......... 828 Standar Paper-B? Co. . . .. .· .... 96 Williams, Jr., The R. H .... .. ...... 716 Union Trust Cot v., ochester & P. Williams v. Morrison ...... . . . .... . 282 R. Co ................ . ........... 609 Williams, Burdett v ...... . . . .. . ... . 542 Umted States- v. American Bell Tel· Willie, The .... . ....... . ....... . .. . 153 ephone Co .... . . . .. . .... . .... ... . 17 Willie, The, Cahill v .... . .......... 159 . UnitedStates v. Beecham .... . ., .. . 284 Willis v. McCnllen.. ....... . ....... 641 nited States v. Bergenthal. ...·.;.. 444 Willis v. Miller...... ..... ......... 288