viii CASES REPORTED. » Page Page Case Manuf’g Co., Ennis v .... . .... 487 County of Juneau, May v .... . ..... 241 Cassandra Adams, The .......... .. . 379 County of Lincoln, Luning v .... . .. 749 Cassandra Adams, The, Tebo v.. . 4 . 379 County of Lincoln, Sutro v .... . .... 749 Celluloid Manuf’g Co. v. American County of Lincoln, Vincentv ....... 749 ’ Zylonite Co .... . ...... . ........... 437 County of Logan, May v .... . ...... 250 Celluloid Manuf’g Co. v. Zylonite County of Mercer, May v. .... . . .... 246 Novelty Co ........ . ......... . .. . 617 County of St. Charles, Shelley v .... 603 Central at. Bank v. Hazard ....... 484 County of Seneca, May v .... . ..... 250 Central Trust Co. v. East Tennessee, Creamer v. Bowers .... . . . . ........ 185 _ V. & G. R. C0.. .................. 895 Cross v. Seeberger .... . ............ 427 Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. Cumberland, The .... . ............. 449 & P. Ry. Co ...................... 332 Cumberland, The, Clarke v .... . . .. . 449 Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. Cunard S. S. Co. v. The Noordland 502 & P. Ry. Co. .............. . ..... .. 344 Curtiss v. Hurd ....... . ...... . .... 729 Certain Diamonds, United States v. 364 Cushing v. The Wisconsin. .... . .... 879 Chandler v. Bacon ...... . ........ I . 538 Cutler v. Lang ............ . . ....... 173 Chandler v. Thompson ...... . ...... 38 Cutting v. Florida Ry. & Nav. Co. . 663 Chapman, Kellog v .... . ..... . .... 882 Cutting, Massa v ...... . .... . ...... . 1 Charlotte Webb, The .... . ...... . . . . 704 Charlotte Webb, The, Kennedy v.:. 704 Danziger, Arnold v .... . ........... 898 Cheney, The W. E .... . ...... . ..... 844 Daylesford, The .... . .... . .... . .... 633 - Cherokee, The. .. . .......... . ..... 283 Daylesford, The, Le Baron v ....... 633 Cherokee, The .... .... . ...... 640 De Arrote ui, Morgan’s Louisiana Cherokee, The ..................... 703 & T. R. g S. S. Co. v. ............ 271 Cherokee and Cargo, The, Young v. 283 Decker v. Baltimore & N. Y. R. Co. 723 Chesebrough, Arnold v .... . . ...... 145 De Graaf, Kittle v. ................. 689 Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co., Smith v. 722 De Groat, United States v .... . . .... 764 Chicago. M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Denmead v. The Alice M. Minot 212 Hartshorn ...... _ ............ . .... 541 Detroit Lubricator Co. v. Lunken— . Chicago & E. I. R. Co., Spies v. .... 397 heimer .... . ..... . ........... . . . . 190 Chicago & I. R. Co. v. Pyne ..... . .. 86 DiamondMateb Co.,United States v. 108 - Chisolm, Woolf v .......... . ....... 881 Dictator. The .... . . ...... . ......... 637 Citizens' Mut. Ins. Co., Guy v ...... 695 Dictator, The .... . . . ............... 699 City of Augusta, The ...... . ....... 844 Dillenback v. The Rossend Castle. . 462 City of Augusta, Bard v .... . .... . . . 906 Dillon, The John H .......... . .... . 285 City of Augusta, The, Carpenter v.. 844 Dillon, The John H., L’Hommedieu City of New York, Heissenbuttel v. 456 v ......................... . ..... . 285 City of Philadelphia,Worswick Man- Dixon v. The Surrey .... . . . .... .. .. 223 uf’g Co. v .... . .. ........ . . ....... 625 Doane v. King ..................... 106 City of Portland, Smith v. ......... 734 Dobson v. Lees .... . . ......... . .... 625 City of Savannah, Coast—Line R. Dodero v. The Laura Belle. .... . .. . 842 Co. v .... . . ...... . . ........ . . .... 646 Donvan, Johnston v .... . .... . ..... 395 City of Worcester, Banigan v .... . . 392 Doris Eckhoff, The ........ . . . . .... 140 Clailin, Cluett v .... . .... . . . . .... . . 921 Doris Eckhoif, The, Loud v., ...... 140 Clark v. Wilson .... . ............... 372 Dreiske v. The Brothers .... . ...... 75 Clark, Beau v .... . ............... . . 225 Drexler v. Smith. .. .... . ........... 754 Clarke v. The Cumberland. ...... . . 449 Dubuque& S. C. R. Co., Woodruff v. 91 Clinton Fire Ins. Co., Vette v ...... 668 Duclos, Froment v. . . ..... . ...... . 385 Cluett v. Claflin .... . . . . ............ 921 Duesh v. A. J. Medlar Co. . . . ...... 619 Cluett v. Mack ............. . ....... 924 Duluth Lumber Co., Torrant v ..... 830 Coaslt·Line R. Co. v. City of Savan- 646 Dun, The Lizzie M ....... . . . .. . .... 927 na ........................ . ..... Coihn v. The Osceola .......... . . . . 383 Eagan, United States v .... . ...... . . 495 Cohn v. Seeberger ...... . ....... . .. 425 Eagan, United States v.. . . .. .... .. . 498 Coleman v. Peshtigo Lumber Co. . . 317 Eagan, United States v ............. 608 Colt, Stubbs v. ...... . ..... . . . . ..... 417 Eager. Milro v. ...... . . .... . . ..... 544 Colts' Patent Fire—Arms Manuf'g Earnshaw, Ugiited States v .... . .... 672 Co., Gally v ...... . .............. 118 East Tennessee, V. & G. R. Co., Communipaw Coal Co. v. The Young Central Trust Co. v.. ............. 895 ` America ........... . . . . .......... 789 East Tennessee, V. & G. R. Co., Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Gibson v. ................ . ....... 904 . Fisher ........ . . ........ . ....... 662 Eastern Paper»Bag Co. v. Standard Cooper v. Bank of British North Paper-Bag Co. .... . . .... . . . . ..... 63 America ............. . . . . .... . . . 171 Eaves, In re.. ...................... 21 County of Cass, May v .... . ........ 762 Eleven Horses, United States v ..... 916