x duns maromnb.
N , _' _ , _ Page Page
o Iowa Barb Steel Wire Co. v. South- Lee, Movius v .... ....... ........... 298
ern Barbed—Wire Co .......... ·. . . 123 Lee, The Frank P. , .... . . . . .... . . . . 277
Iowa Barb Steel Wire Co. v. South- Lees. Dobson v .... . ........... . . . . 625
ern Barbed—Wire Co., .... . ....... 615 Le Page, Gloucester Isinglass &
y Glue Co. v .... . . . . .... . ........ 370
‘ Jackson, Frankie v. ........... .... 398 Lewis v. Sixty-Five Packages of
James A. Gariield, The ..... . ...... 285 Merchandise ..................... 195
James L. Pendergast, The, Bol- L’Hommedieu v. The John H.
ten v .... . .......... . ............. 717 Dillon ........ . ............. . .... 285
James Rumsey, The ...... . ......... 280 List Pub. Co. v. Keller .... . ........ 772
Jesup, Neilsen v. .... . ............. 138 Littlefield Stove Co., Filley v ...... 434
J. L. Mott Iron-Wo1·ks v. Skirm .... 621 Live Oak, The ...... . .......... . . . . 78
John H. Dillon, The. ............... 285 Live Oak, The, Carlson v ...... . . . . 78
John H. Dillon, The, L’Homme· Lizzie E., The .... . ................. 876
dieu v .... . ....... .. ..... » ......... 28 5 Lizzie E., The, Sweeny v .... . .... . . 876
John H. Dillon, The, Starace v. .... 285 Lizzie M. Dun, The .... . . .... . ..... 927
Johnson, Exchange Nat. Bank v. . . 588 Lizzie M. Dun, The, Thorsberg v. . 927
Johnston v. Donvan ..... . ........ 395 Long, United Statesv..I ........... 678
Jordon, Simonson v. ............... 721 Lord Warden, The, v. TheSilica. . . 845
Joslin, Newton v .... . . .... . ....... 891 Lord Warden, The, The Silica v... . 845
June v. Willis .... . . . . .... . . .... . . . . 11 Loud v. The Doris Eckhoif .... . . . . 140
Lublin, Henius v ...... . .... . . . . .. . 838
Kallstrom, United States v ........ . 184 Luning v. County of Lincoln ....... 749
Kaolatype Engraving Co. v. Hoke.. 444 Lunkenheimer, etroit Lubricator
. Keary v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Co. v ............ . ....... . ....... 190
Ass’n .... . . . . .... . . .... . . . . .... . . 359 Luyties v. Hollendeer .... . . . .... . . . 632
Keebler, Roth v .... . . . . .... . . . . .... 618 Lyon v. Zimmer .... . .............. 401
’ Keller, List Pub. C0. v ......... . . . . 772 ,
Kellerman v. Aultman.. .... . . . .. . . . 888 Mabie, Montross v. . . .. ....... . ..... 234
Kellogg v. Chapman ........... . .. . 882 Mack, Cluett v. . . . ................. 924
Kemmish v. Ball .... . .... . ....... . . 759 Maggie M., The .... . . .... . . .... . . . . 692
Kennedy v. The Charlotte Webb. . . 704 Maggie M., The, Robinson v. ...... 692
Kenzel v. The Nokomis.. ........ . . 711 Manitoba, The .... . . ............... 129
Keuffel, Higgins v ......... . . ...... 627 Manitoba, The, Northwest Transp.
King v. The Carlotta. .... . . .... . . . . 878 C0. v .... . ..... . ................. 129
King, Doane v. ................ . . . . 106 Mallory, In re .... . ........... . . .... 663
Kittle v. DeGraaf ...... . ........... 689 Margaret J. Sanford. The .... . ..... 714
Kittle v. Freeman .... ~ ......... . .... 6 90 Margaret J. Sanford, The, Partridge
Kittle v. Hall .... . . . . .......... . . . . 239 v .... . ......... . .... . . ........... 714
Kittie v. Herts ..... . . . . ........ . . . . 690 Marsh v. Seeberger .... . ........... 422
` Kittle v. Schneider. .... . ....... . . . . 690 Martin v. Pond. . . .............. . . 15
Kittle v. Willard ........ . .... . ..... 690 Martin,Lamson Cash-Railway Co. v. 824
Klipstein v. The Polynesia. .... . . . . 210 Marx v. Hanthorn .... . ......... . . . . 579
Knapp, Stout & Co. Company v. Na- Mary N. Hogan, The ...... . .... . . . . 381
tional Mut. Fire Ins. Co .......... 607 Mary N. Hogan, The ...... . .... . ... 927
Knapp. Stout do Co. Company v. Mary N. Hogan, The, Gillespie v... 381
, PeopIe’s Mut. Fire Ins. Co. ....... 607 Mary N. Hogan, The, Hooper v .... 927
Koch v. Seeberger .... . .......... . . 424 Mary’O:lell, The .... . .............. 700
Koch, Post v ....................... 208 Massa v. Cutting ...... . .... . . .... . . 1
Koehler, Roberts v. . . ..   . . .. .. . .. 94 May v. County of Cass ...... . ...... 762
· Koehler, Ex parte .... . ....... . . .... 867 May v. County of Juneau. .... . .... 241
» May v. County of Logan ..... . .... 250
Lamont v. Hotel Men’s Mut. Ben. May v. County of Mercer ..... . .... 246
Ass’n .... . .... . ........ . ..... . . . . 817 May v. County of Seneca ........... 250
Lamson “CasI1—Railway C0. v. Maynard v. Green .... . .... . . .. ...... 643
Martin ...... ..... ...... .. ..... .. 824 McCarty & Hall Trading Co. v.
Lancaster, Bateson v ............... 670 Glaenzer .... . ....... . . ........... 387
Lancaster,Simmons Hardware Co.v. 670 McCormick, Palmer v .... . .... . .... 82
Lancaster, Wedemeyer v. .... . ..... 670 McGillis, McGregor v .... . ......... 388
Lang, Cutler v. .... . . . .. .... . ...... 173 McGregor v. Mc illis ....... . ...... 388
Lantry, United States v. ........... 232 cKenna v. The Carolina .... . . .... 199
. Laura Belle, The .... .. ......... . .. . 842 McKenna, Old Dominion Steam-
Laura Belle, The, Dodero v ........ 842 Ship Co. v. .... . ....... . .... . . .... 48
Lawton v. Blitch .... . ...... . . . .... . 641 McLaughlin, United States v. (seven
Le Baron v. The Daylesford ....... 633 cases) ...... . ..... . ......... . ..... 147