I ARRANGED UNDER THEIR RESPECTI VE CIRCUITS
AND DISTR1 CTS.
Page P•g•
FIIICI CIRCUIT- t;2£%2’»CtT3‘it%t2ta· ········· it?
* s . ...... . . .
¤¤=¤=¤T COM- D- M·~¤¤—~¤¤¤¤¤¤¤· §¢$£T.$1qtiE.11$11Z ZZ 1 1 1I1I1X1' 21111 $3-1
Banigan v. City of Worcester .... . . 392 %`#gm°‘“l;· NIIUOMI S· 8* C° ··••···  
Bxgwne v. National Color Printing 538   ;· 3;:3:: ···· · · ··•·· · ····· ·· ·* 188
o. .... .. ..........   ....... ;.. · ···· •• ‘‘‘‘• * ‘‘'·  
Chandler v. Bacon. .... . ........... 538
Eastern Paper·Bag Co. v. Standard D1s·1·mo·1· Comvr, E. D. Nnw Yom:.
Paper-Bag Co. ...... . . . . ......... 63 ·
Fergus, Petitioner .... . .... . . . . .... 607 Alaska. T]'16 --·····-····-··- · ··-···- 839
Glqucggtgy Iginglagg & (}]¤g CO_ v_ A]f1‘8d0, T]16 .... · . .. . . .: . . . . . .. . . .. . 842
Le Page .... .. .... . ..... . ........ 370 Beebe v· The W¤¤¤<>¤¤1¤ ·-·. · ·-·--· 846
Haynes, n re ...... . ............... 767 Bivvmer v- The Thomas P- WW &
Hill v. Holyoke Envelope Co ....... 623 T}18 W¤¤l6§ S'10¤<>Y ···-·· · ··-··- 207
Lajsriison 02212-1w1w2y oe. v. 824 Bggoklyh & - Y· Ferry 00- v- The 839
artin ....   ......   ....,.... 8<1¤0 ··-~ ·· -··· ·· ···· ·· ··-··-··
United Slgglggg v_ American BO]] Tg]. Camp V. ThE Miha A. R83d. . . .. . . . 205
epmmelco ....................... 523 gehepty- '{`Fh: Mme A- Reed ---· · - ·- gg;
ar o a, e .............. . . .... . .
  Hmm Carolina, The .... . ....... . ......... 199
C"‘°U“` C°°“T‘ D' NEW HAM" ‘· camuem adams, The. .... .. ...... me
cutier v. Lang .... .. .... . .... . ..... 173 Coifh; v- The Osceola- -   --·- - . ·-·- 388
Fairbanks v. Amoskeag Nat. Bank 602 guiéhlilg V·rIT}?°IYV¤¤C0E$§?·· ····-·-·  
~ o erov. e aura e e .........
— Ella Warner, The. . . .... . ...... .. . 203
Cr F1 . ' S & B '1
SE<¤0N1> cmcm. F2t2‘;?iI§?2YT§T“F??..F???? .... T1?'. 202
urnessia, e .............. . . .... 878
CIRCUIT COURT, D. CONNECTICUT.   {NIH · N·i6· -8té · · •  
. r . . . . _
Gally v. C0lt’s Patent Fire-Arms Haskell v. The Ella Warner.? . Q. . . 203
Glianufég Co.. . . . .................   Hooper v. Th'e_1Ma1x;y N. Hogan ..... 927
unn v. avage ........ . .... . .... uismann v. e 'onee .... . . . .. . 206
Intcrnlationcal Tooth Crown Co. v. 7 ging v. The rIQla1·]1o’ttla.. .   .... . .... 378
ic mon . .... . ............... . . 75 ipstein v. e o nesia. ........ 210
Stubbs v. Colt. . . ................... 417 Daum Bellg, The}?`. .     .... .   842
· ewis v. ixty- ive ac a es 0
DISTRICT COURT, D_ CONNECTICUT. MOTCh8HdlS0 .... .`. . . . . . . . .5 . . . . . 195
Lizzie M. Dun, The ...... . . . . ...... 927
Burdett v. Williams. . ......... . .... 697 Mary N. Hogan, The ...... . .... . . . . 381
United States v. Diamond Match O0. 108 Mag N. Hoglaln, The? .... . .... . . . . 927
c enna v. e aro ina ...... . . . . 199
Clggupp COURT, E_ D_ NEW YQRK_ M. E. Byard, Tl1B .... . .. . . .. .. . . .. . 205
· _ Merritt v. One Case of Wool ....... 195
Allen v. Seven Hundred and Eighty- Merritt v. One Package of Merchan-
F1ve Tons of Coal ...... . ........ 204 dise .... . ............ . .... .. . .... 195
~ (xv)