_ xvi CASES REPORTED.
Page P¤§°
Drsrnrcr Courvr, N. D. Nmw Yom;. Boskenna Bay. In re, The. . . .... . . . 612
City of Alexandria, The ............ 427
Honora Carr, The... . . .... . . . . . . .. .. 8424 Deep Sea Hydraulic Dredging Co. v.
· The City 0f_ Alexandria .... . .....  
CIRCUIT Cem- S— D- New YM RSS r`Z.Zi?’i"l?$?T?;1;Ji;;1;1iiiiiiiti gg?
American B It Tele hom O0_ v_ Fulda, The ........   . . . .. ....   rl_
Globe Telephone og .... . ........ 729 g?‘¥g“,¥°s“· TPP? ·     *· ‘. ‘‘·‘'‘ * °  
. Brady v. Stillman ............. ..... 791 G{géQ·. h 6·   GQ 51 Emma ·‘‘'‘ ‘  
Brown v. American Finance Co. .... 516 8* Wm v" ° * m¤¤m ‘‘‘’ ' '°''' 232
Campbell v. James ................. 525 g;gQ;g'd°# T[,]i8‘  é'   ‘‘'' ' ' ‘‘'' ' ' 163
Chadbourne v. German-American G _ D .V‘ Tg I g ' '''' ' ''''°' .231
Ins. Co .... . ..........,.......... 533 H“’_‘;“p°,i,'];t· G Btth ·······*‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 232
°’}g‘;”gQf“° V- G·=r¤·=~¤·Am¤¤¤¤¤ 6,5 n3t.s¥l.tt°M§ZdfP2°¢;.1   bskié
om.; v semiZII‘IZ"‘I‘i1IIIZI.Z at S¤Wl¤g·M¤¤hi¤¤ 0- ——··   ··-·· 293
Church v. Spiegelburg .......... .. . 601 Henry P"?·St°n* Sr" Tim '‘'''’ ’ ' ' ' igtt
com v. em. Files Co .... . .... .. . 43 g>;¤qgl§g1<;ggg¢y» The- -···--·-····· 412
Cottle v. Krementz ....   ...... 42 L 5g I .  
Estes v. Worthington ........ . ..... 154 7 h°E*’““}“ lL7g?; °C°‘* ‘ p 492
Fuller v.` Metropolitan Life Ins. L ls ' Lg.?1°,i°£lr; ‘   tq‘1t‘ ' ' ‘‘'' 486
Co ................. . ............ 696 L°"{’h"· Tg J°“‘“; St? Q Q ···· ·· 156
Gallagher v. The Young America. . . 749 Mau uhjgv ,Fh8O§.?;_t L6? n y ''`' ' 570
_ Gamewell Fire—Alarm Tel. Co. v. g ' " ' ' ''''''' 22
The M 312 Mary Powell, The,. .... . ........... 6
GwMhm?t;°;'  ' ' `‘°‘'’' ‘ '‘‘‘ 220 MarySPowe1l Co., The, v. The Phil- 622
l . . ‘ ‘‘‘‘‘‘°‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ ' ' tt. . . ............. .. ....
I ` g23g;;s3uI;é1{);g°' ‘ ' ' ’‘'‘''`'‘‘''   l\lIe11i)en1d1;>1z0v. The Keystone .... . . . . 412
Hm V Sat, B ' '''' ‘ ''''''''’`‘'° 282 Moore v. The Mary Powell ....... . 622
Hoff YQ_ Img    ' '''' 45 Murphy v. The Greenpoint .... . . . .  
Holmes Electric Protective oe. v. }`§}§§§;j}t,Tf‘t‘;tty6tt·gmt;é·Ct;t;;tj 1
Metropolitan Burglar Alarm C0. . 562 lam Timm C0 494
Jennings v. Lowenstine .... . ....... 84 p p' "r ‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 1 ‘‘‘‘‘
J L Mott h_OD_W0rks v Cassidtf 47 ggtmzosv. Compritgnie Francaise...  
‘ ’ . ' ,   i ip innott, e ....   ....  
Jugg Y;F¤¤}ii*¤ &M¤*¤¤~=*¤i *-182 2fw..tvt;rt.._1t—ul.;[tH ....... .. .... tgt
Kell ` v. iiéaeeH.'.'.'.'.`.'.'.`.`.'..2 ..... I 607 .°'”“ ° "‘ °· ° ···· · ·······
La 1{ue v. Western Electric Co ..... ·80 W;5?:mH€r v` The Thomas Mel` 486
of Honor .... . .... . .......... . .. 592
Macy v. Remuants, etc., of the Mary Gmourm Comvr, D. Vmnuonr.
K. Campbell ....... . . ............ S40
Mary K. Campbell, The ..... . ...... 840 Knower v. Haines .... . . ......... . . 513
» Mem v. Kelly .... . .... . ...· . ....... 1 53 Thomson-Houston Electric Cv- v·
Mott Iron-Works v. Cassidy ...... .. 47 Brush-Swan Electric L. & P. Co., 585
National Bank of the Republic v. Witters v. Sowles .... . . . . .......... 1
City of St. Joseph .... . . .......... 216 Wltters v. Bowles .... . .. .... . . .... . 5
O'Sul1ivan, In re ........ . ......... 447 l
gamut Clotllgng Co. v. Glover ...... 816
hi lips v. ochert ............... 39
Roemer v. Simon .... . . ..... . .... . . 41 THIRD CIRCUIT-
Rogers v. Riessner ........ . . ....... 591
Stewart v. Schell ................... 65
-u¤m stmt v. seam ........... am ¤r¤¤¤¤ <><>¤M· D- D¤¤¤¤¤¤¤·
United States v. Barnes .......... .-. 705 _ , ·
United States Bung Mtmupg gm Melvin v.Rob1nson .... . .... . ...... 684
v. Independent Bung & Bushing
Y£;’ég·AE1&_iéé·   ·•···· · · ···· · · · mis Drs·rR1c1· Counm, D. DELAWARE.'
Argus, The .... .. .................. 481
Dxsrmor Comer, S. D. Naw Yom:. MgCabe v.Old Dominion Steam-Ship 234
. o. .... . ..... . . . ...· . ........ . . . .
Anderson v. Scully .... .. .... . ..... 161 National Dredging Co. v. The Ar-
Berhaus v. The Georgeanuaa. .... . . 405 gus ...... . ....................... 481